Archaeological excavation of a likely Christian Nestorian graveyard
2022 2023 2024

The site of Urgut was declared a World Heritage Site by the UNESCO World Heritage Commission as part of the transnational project "Silk Roads: Zarafshan-Karakum Corridor" on 17 September 2023.

Starting point

From 2004 to 2008, the Society for the Exploration of EurAsia conducted archaeological work at the site of Suleiman-tepa located south of Samarkand in Uzbekistan. (See here under Completed Projects/Urgut Monastery).

It resulted in the discovery of a monastery dated between the 9th and 12th centuries. Following chance indications by local people, in was decided in spring 2022 to resume work at Suleiman-tepa/Urgut in order to identify and excavate the presumed graveyard attached to the monastery.

.

 

 

 

FIELD REPORT

ON THE

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS

AT URGUT- SULEIMAN-TEPA,

UZBEKISTAN IN 2022

 

 

 

"Tagara" ceramic vessel from the monastery
with a depiction of a cross

 

 

 

 

Samarkand 2022


LIST OF EXCAVATORS 

CONTENTS

 


 

Introduction

 

Sponsor: Society for the Exploration of EurAsia (Switzerland).

Performers: International Institute for Central Asian Studies (IICAS) in cooperation with the Samarkand Archaeological Institute named after Ya. Gulyamov.

In 2022, research work was carried out on the territory of the Suleiman-tepa monument (a medieval Christian monastery).
Earlier, from 2004 to 2008, archaeological work was already carried out on this territory, which resulted in the opening of a monastery dated between the 9th and 12th centuries.
The purpose of the research in 2022 was to search for a necropolis dating back to the time of the existence of this monastery, as well as to continue work on the territory of the monastery.
Given that the monastery was quite large and had existed for more than one century, there were solid grounds for searching for a necropolis in which the monks buried their dead.
In the course of the research work, fragments of human bones were found on the territory adjacent to the monastery. The human remains were dug up as a result of construction activities using an excavator. This site is located 240 metres south of the monastery on the territory of a garden (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 4-5). The discovered remains were sent to a laboratory for radiocarbon dating. On 5 September 2022, the results of analyses were ready – 8th-10th centuries, with the 9th century determined as most probable after correlation.

Goals:

1.      Archaeological work at the Suleiman-tepa monastery;

2.      Exploration and archaeological work on the Suleiman-tepa 1 necropolis;

3.      Exploration work in the foothills near the monastery in order to search for caves and rock inscriptions;

4.      Preparation of an academic report on the results of the conducted research.


Work description:

In 2022, research work was carried out to study the early Christian monument of Suleiman-tepa. This object is located in the Republic of Uzbekistan, Samarkand region, Urgut district, in a mountainous area on the southern outskirts of the city of Urgut (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 1-3). Experts from Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and the USA took part in the expedition. In total, the expedition team consisted of more than 10 researchers.

The project's research curator was a representative of the Samarkand Archaeological Institute named after Ya. Gulyamov, its acting director Muminkhon Saidov, the expedition was headed by the IICAS director Dmitry Voyakin.

The research work on the monument consisted of several stages:

1.      A preparatory stage, consisting of geodetic and geophysical work on future work sites;

2.      Archaeological work on two sites: the monastery, the necropolis;

3.      Processing of discovered materials and writing a report.


As a result of the work, the following results were obtained:

1. In the course of geodetic works using the Trimble R3 GNSS receiver and the Leica TCR 407 laser total station, a topographic plan of the monastery and the adjacent territory was prepared, a three-dimensional model of the topography was created, geomagnetic scanning of future archaeological sites was carried out using the GSSI SIR 300 geomagnetic scanner with a 270 MHz antenna;

2. Three excavations were made on the territory of the monastery: excavation No. 1 was outside the monastery in its south-western part, the excavation has a trapezoidal shape, stretching from north to south, dimensions 8x7 m: excavation No. 2 is located east of excavation No. 1, also outside the monastery; it was made on the site of an old test trench, which was expanded to the size of 4.7x2.8 metres and stretched along the WE line; excavation No. 3 is located inside the monastery along the southern wall (dimensions 10.5x0.5 m).

During the work carried out at excavation No. 1 at a depth of 1.3 metres a pavement running from west to east along the southern wall was discovered; the width of the pavement is 2.4 metres, the revealed length is 6.5 metres, in the western part of the pavement has an elevation in the form of a step going all across the pavement, the height of the step reaches 40 cm. On the territory of excavation No. 2, a continental layer was reached at a depth of 205 cm, in the northern profile of the excavation a masonry of large pebbles is visible, which is the base of the outer wall; it also has on it the large adobe (pakhsa) bricks of the wall body; on the territory of excavation No. 3, the inner face of the outer southern wall was cleared and documented, the depth of the excavation was 2.3 metres.

3. On the territory of the burial ground, an excavation was made, stretching from south-west to north-east along the slope; the dimensions of the excavation are 22x7 m, the excavation consists of 3 terraces going down the slope from SE to NW. In total, 17 burials were examined on the territory of the necropolis. The burials are oriented from west to east; structurally, the burials consist of an entrance pit from the east, dug to a depth of about 1.5 metres, and a burial chamber undercut in the western direction for the entire length of a buried person; the passage between the entrance pit and the burial chamber was blocked with mud bricks (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 128-130).

When studying the inner surface of the burial chambers and grave pits, traces of a tool used to dig out the soil and form the shape of a burial structure were found – this tool most likely looked like a wooden stick with a pointed flat plate 2 to 4 cm wide on the end.

The burial chambers themselves were filled with soil before the passage into them was blocked with mud bricks; soil was also poured on the floor of the burial chamber before the body of the deceased person was placed there.

The buried people lie on their backs in an outstretched position, arms crossed at the waist, legs directed to the east, head to the west and slightly raised, the face thus turned to the east. No grave goods were found; all the burials are those of men; only a small ceramic lamp was found in one burial.

The structure of the necropolis is quite definite – the burials are arranged in a grid, the distances between them from west to east are about 1.5 metres, from north to south about 1 metre. Some of the burials were found in the profile of the excavation, as well as in a vertical slope next to the excavation – this indicates that the boundaries of the necropolis extend beyond the current excavation. Further research will allow us to get more information about the boundaries of the monument, the study of anthropological material and DNA analysis will allow us to better understand who lived on this territory during the existence of the monastery and what were their living conditions.

4. Field material was processed:

o    The finds were processed – descriptions were provided, drawings and photographs were made;

o    Drawing documentation was prepared, which included schematic maps, plans of excavations and individual elements, cuts, stratigraphic profiles, altitudinal plans;

o    A description of all excavation elements was prepared in accordance with the Ancient Merv Site Manual, Edited by Tim Williams, UCL, 2007

o    All burials were described and a field description of anthropological material was made;

o    All materials were packed and, according to certificates, forwarded to the Samarkand Archaeological Institute named after Ya. Gulyamov.

5. The nearby mountains were inspected for rock inscriptions dating back to the time of the monastery. Discovered inscriptions were already known and described earlier; no new inscriptions were identified. This work will be carried out more thoroughly in the following years. There is a plan to prepare cartographic material with the locations of inscriptions, conduct detailed documentation, including photo records, create three-dimensional models of surfaces, on which inscriptions are applied, translate and interprete them (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 133-156).

Excavation Methodology and Equipment Utilized

 

Based on these goals and objectives, an expedition was organized which included several specific groups and specialists who were responsible for carrying out the planned excavation which included the following:

An international team of archaeologists. The task of this group was to carry out a series of investigations which involved the clearing and discovery of building structures aimed at providing detailed analysis of the cultural layers and cultural material including the discovery and analysis of materials from the ceramic and osteological collections; materials from metallurgy; and other artifacts.

Also, this group collected samples for carpology, palynology, C-14 and flotation using generally accepted guidelines.

A surveying team. This team carried out the documentation of the entire process of archaeological investigations with the analysis of the results of the data obtained through the study of individual components of the monastery and the graveyard by using advanced geodetic equipment. The resulting work of this group involved the construction of 3D models of the excavation sites; the creation of ortho-photomaps and stratigraphic profiles; detailed excavation plans; microtopography; and the development of plans which locate topographically the discovered materials.

Documentation was carried out using a Leica TCR-407 total station with subsequent data processed in the AutoCAD and ArcGIS environment in parallel with photographic recordation of building structures and photogrammetry utilizing a DJI Mavic 2 Pro unmanned aerial vehicle.

In the process of conducting preliminary aerial photography, the following tasks were performed:

Preparation of the site by clearing the areas of grass and underbrush which creates difficulties in scanning. In addition, the site was cleared of modern household waste (glass, metal, etc.)

A breakdown of the entire excavation area into sections/units was made. The findings are reflected in the appendix of this report.

A team of ceramic technologists was formed for the task of processing the cultural material to study the production technology and provide a description of the ceramic collection and other discovered materials; draw the ceramics and other finds and record them in a spreadsheet of arranged tables. This team also reconstructed ceramic vessels and collected statistical data.

A team for logistical processing. The task of this group was to process the discovered cultural materials of the ceramic and osteological collections, as well as metal products and other artifacts by means of washing and cleaning ceramic and osteological materials in compliance with the conditions and the storage location. Metallic materials were processed in accordance with methodological recommendations and interpreted by specialists. All materials were carefully processed, labeled, and described with an individual serial number for each piece of material. The obtained data is displayed in the appendices of this report.

The main priority involved the implementation of the planned activities for the analysis and documentation of materials and elements of the building structures of the area of occupation discovered during the archaeological excavation.

The cultural material found as a result of the abovementioned investigations were assigned a special serial number and special finds were measured using the theodolite-tacheometer and coordinates were obtained in the UTM system. These materials are displayed on the excavation top plan. All the material discovered as a result of the excavation have been carefully processed and cleaned in controlled conditions.

On the basis of the description and photographic record of the cultural materials from the excavation, a collection inventory was created, a general record was made, and statistical data of the revealed materials were established. Then, these materials were documented, packaged, and prepared for transfer in accordance with documentary regulations.

Once the excavation identified and cleared the building structures or graves, descriptions were made of the identified components followed by design and drawing documentation.

This particular work was carried out by documentary specialists who know the latest methods and modern technologies in the field of geodesy and planography. In the course of this work, drawings of the identified elements, a general view of the excavation, and stratigraphic profiles were created.

The methodological basis of the excavation was conducted with the following components:

o      Excavations across wide areas;

o      Layer-by-layer and elevation recordation of the work performed;

o      Development of a detailed plan of the identified structures using electronic tacheometers;

o      A methodical, comparative analysis for the study of finds;

o      A recordation method for establishing the stratigraphic and planographic situation;

o      A method of including archeological features into a geographic information system (GIS) for their precise positioning in space relative to each other and the landscape background.


The collection of documentation is based on a system developed by specialists from the University of Aachen under the guidance of Professor Michael Jansen and Dr. Thomas Urban. This system is based on the completion of specially designed forms, whereby a certain level of data collection is achieved. While the presence of a field diary does not serve as the basis for reaching the desired level, the researcher is presented with a series of so-called forms.

The "Main form," providing a general description of a site or a separate excavation, as well as a description of plans, goals, objectives and ways to achieve them.

An "Action sheet" is a type of field diary, in which the researcher enters daily information about the actions performed, as well as about the objects found, sizes, etc.

“A Locus Sheet” is a detailed account of each feature detected, the layer removed, or a specific feature noticed, etc., and is called a "locus" followed by being assigned a locus number.

"Find Tag or Label" is a form that is set up specifically for certain finds that are clearly different from the bulk of the excavated material.

A "Photograph Log" is a type of database with a catalog of photographs taken during the excavation, indicating the location, the direction of the shot, followed by a brief description, etc.

When human remains are discovered, an “Osteological Worksheet” is completed that aids the archaeologist in the process of examining the features of the burial and skeletal remains to provide rudimentary and preliminary identification of sex and age for adult remains. Our team does not have an osteoarcheologist or forensic scientist, therefore, any conclusions concerning human remains need to be considered as preliminary and in need of further examination by a specialist.

The team also included a brigade of local workers from the Urgut city itself who assisted with excavation, photography, soil shifting, and recordation. Excavation involved the use of shovels, small hand tools, trowels, and dental tools.

A metal detectorist was also used in controlled conditions to assist excavators with metal finds. Findspots were carefully recorded using the total station.

The sandy-loam soil at graveyard provides unique challenges to excavators. For example, the medieval mudbricks have the same color, consistency, and texture as the surrounding soil; to the untrained eye, mudbricks sometimes become invisible. Likewise, after excavation, the soil dries out and, especially in direct sunlight overhead, the distinction between features (cut, fill, layers, and mudbricks) can disappear. That is why the best visual analysis of units, as well as site photography, occur immediately after excavation while the soil still has moisture. Also, in the early morning, when the soil is less dry, and the sun is at an oblique angle, archaeological features are more visible. Moreover, during the day, when the soil dries out, a thin layer of fine dust forms on the surface and, if there is wind, this dust covers the units, thus obscuring the subtle distinction between features. Usually, sweeping with a hand brush and removing the dust solves this problem; however, the dust sometimes hovers in the air and soon new dust forms on the surface, sometimes caused by sweeping. In response, several techniques have been developed by the IICAS team to mitigate these issues.

The basic tool for excavation is the flat sharpened shovel and unsharpened trowel. The shovel is used to “shave” thin layers of soil both in a horizontal and vertical manner; by carefully scraping with the shovel, excavators can level transects and clarify sections. Likewise, the trowel is used to scrape the soil evenly and in a controlled manner, revealing changes in soil color and texture, and objects. In examining nuances, we use the Munsell Color Chart to classify differences of the soil. Smaller tools such as dental picks and hand brushes are used when artifacts and faunal remains are detected. Loose soil is removed by sweeping with the hand brush and, with a dustpan, soil is placed within a bucket. Depending on the unit, the soil is then sifted through a screen; otherwise, the loose soil is placed in a wheelbarrow and deposited on the soil heap. Always prior to photographing the excavated area and analysis (field-note writing), hand brushes are used to clean the troweled units. Sometimes it is necessary to use a fine-mist water-sprayer to evenly (and gently) rehydrate the soil; this method has become essential in distinguishing between soil and cultural features, especially regarding the pit burials during the afternoons. Likewise, sometimes it is necessary to use a mechanical leaf-blower to blow the fine dust away from surface of the excavated units—this method is only used by our site directors or under close supervision. The leaf-blower has a secondary advantage of clearing away the fine dust that is in between the mudbrick courses; and, in the case of the buildings, the leaf-blower reveals the distinction between the clay plaster that coated the walls, soil fill, surfaces, and mudbricks.  

The following field report provides descriptions of each excavation unit and their revealed stratigraphy; discovered archaeological features (designated loci); artifact descriptions, photographs, and drawings including grave goods; and selected descriptions of special finds, field forensics and initial data from the graves excavated.


 

Excavations and Units Descriptions

 

Excavation ST (monastery)

 

In 2022, archaeological excavations were resumed on the territory of the previously partially excavated medieval Christian monastery Suleyman-tepa. Three excavations were made on the territory of the monastery: excavation No. 1 was outside the monastery in its south-western part, the excavation has a trapezoidal shape, stretching from north to south, dimensions 8x7 m: excavation No. 2 is located east of excavation No. 1, also outside the monastery; it was made on the site of an old test trench, which was expanded to the size of 4.7x2.8 metres and stretched along the WE line; excavation No. 3 is located inside the monastery along the southern wall (dimensions 10.5x0.5 m) (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 1-5, Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 32).

List of elements

Element 0.

Element 1. A layer of very dense lumpy layered loam, greyish-brown in colour.

Element 2. A layer of dense lumpy-layered loam, grey, grey-brown in colour.

Element 3. Collection of vessel fragments.

Element 4. A heap of stones in the northern part of the excavation near the wall.

Element 5. Accumulation of stones and chips of burnt brick near the eastern stratigraphic wall.

Element 6. Accumulation of bones and ceramics at the western stratigraphic wall of the excavation.

Element 7. Ash pit in the north-eastern corner of the excavation.

Element 9. Dense loam of light grey colour.

Element 10. Gravelly-loamy bright grey layer (lens).

Element 11. A layer of light brown lumpy loam.

Element 12. A layer of dense, light grey loam

Element 13. A layer of bright brown lumpy loam.

Element 14. Chaotic heap of stones and fragments of burnt bricks.

Element 15. Accumulation of stones and fragments of burnt bricks.

Element 16. A layer of lumpy, bright brown, sandy loam.

Element 17. A layer of lumpy loam, bright brown colour, with the inclusion of fine crushed stones.

Element 18. A layer of lumpy, brownish, bright brown colour, with the inclusion of small crushed stones, rock stones.

Element 19. A bulb-shaped spot with organic contents in the north of the excavation.

Element 20. An accumulation of rock stones in the eastern part of the excavation.

Element 21. An accumulation of rock stones in the southern part of the excavation.

Element 22. Accumulation of fragments of vessels.

Element 23. An accumulation of rock stones in the western part of the excavation.

Element 24. An accumulation of stones in the north-western corner of the excavation.

Element 25. Loam-stone structure – border.

Element 26. An accumulation of stones in the north-western part of the excavation

Element 27. A layer of grey loose lumpy loam

Element 28. A layer of thick light grey loose lumpy loam

Element 29. Light yellow dense alluvial loam.

Element 30. Boulder pavement along the northern wall of the excavation.

Code ST_22_01_0

Element 0

Element description

The surface of excavation 01 is an artificial terrace created for agricultural use.

The terrace slopes slightly westwards.

The surface of the terrace has traces of irrigated beds stretching from north to south. The depth of irrigation beds is 10-15 cm. No fragments of ceramics and bones were recorded on the surface during the marking and at the beginning of the study.

 

Code ST_22_01_01

Element 1

Element description

A layer of very dense lumpy layered loam, greyish-brown in colour.

A layer of very dense lumpy layered loam, greyish-brown in colour. The density of the layer is probably associated with agricultural activity and periodic watering.

In the layer there are mainly fragments of red clay ceramics, a small number of sheep and goat bones.

In the north-western corner of the excavation, a fragment of ceramics (St_22_01_01_01) covered with blue and brown glaze and a ceramic fragment coated with green glaze (St_22_01_01_02) were found.

A fragment of green glazed ceramics (St_22_01_01_03) was found in the south-western part of the excavation.

In the south-western part of the excavation, two fragments of glazed ceramics white-brown in hue (St_22_01_01_04), (St_22_01_01_05) were found; a fragment of a bowl (identified by a rim) decorated with green glaze (St_22_01_01_06) was found in the southern part alongside other fragments of green-glazed ceramics.

When removing a layer, a fragment of unglazed ceramics, a square stamp with an impressed image of a cross (St_22_01_01_21), as well as a fragment of glass (St_22_01_01_22) were found. There are few fragments of burnt bricks in the filling (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 7).

 

Code ST_22_01_02

Element 2

Element description

A layer of dense lumpy-layered loam, grey, grey-brown in colour.

A layer 30 cm thick, very dense lumpy-layered loam, grey, grey-brown in colour.

When cleaning the surface, individual fragments of ceramics, burnt bricks, etc are visible.

Presumably, layer (2) is already lower (deeper) than the layer that has preserved traces of modern agricultural activity.

During the removal of the layer, several ferrous metal items were found: a rounded plate (St_22_01_02_01), a fragment of a nail (St_22_01_02_02), a rectangular plate (St_22_01_02_04).

In the northern part of the excavation, several large stones are recorded, located along the west-east line, partially hidden by a stratigraphic border.

There is a slight accumulation of charcoal in the north-eastern corner of the excavation (level 1090.869).

During the clearing of the layer in the western part of the excavation wall an accumulation of animal bones – sheep, goats and others – was found. A molar tooth of a predatory animal (wolf?) was found among the heap of bones. The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_02_03).

When a layer of dense lumpy-layered loam, grey, grey-brown (02) in colour, was removed at the level of 1090.593, 1.2 m from the western wall of the excavation, a collection of vessel fragments was found (coordinates 348575.615 14360495. 304).

Digging the layer along the northern stratigraphic edge of the excavation, large stones were cleaned at the level of 1090.782, forming a structure resembling masonry. The masonry is laid along the wall from west to east.

Excavating a layer along the western stratigraphic wall of the excavation, at the level of 1090.431, an accumulation of bones belonging to cattle, sheep and goats was found. Fragments of white glazed ceramics and fragments of ceramics with green-brown glaze can be traced in the accumulation.

A heap of small and medium-sized black charcoal fragments was found in the north-eastern corner at the level of 1090.858. The ash pit is located between the northern and eastern walls of the excavation, discovered during the removal of a dense loamy layer light brown colour (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 8).

 

Code ST_22_01_03

Element 3

Element description

Collection of vessel fragments.

During the removal of a layer of very dense lumpy-layered loam, grey, grey-brown in colour (02), 1.2 m from the western wall of the excavation at the level of 1090.593, a heap of vessel fragments was found (coordinates 348575.615 14360495. 304).

When cleaning the collection, fragments of unglazed ceramic water vessels and fragments of glazed ceramics were found: green glaze, white glaze with green glaze. 

In the cluster there are bones of sheep and goats (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 9).

 

Code ST_22_01_04

Element 4

Element description

A heap of stones in the northern part of the excavation near the wall.

During the removal of a layer of dense lumpy-layered grey, grey-brown loam, (02) along the northern stratigraphic edge of the excavation at the level of 1090.782, large stones forming a structure resembling masonry were recorded. The masonry is laid along the wall from west to east and adjoins the previously partially excavated pakhsa (adobe) wall (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 10).

 

Code ST_22_01_05

Element 5

Element description

Accumulation of stones and chips of burnt brick near the eastern stratigraphic wall.

An accumulation of stones and chips of burnt bricks were found during the removal of dense lumpy-layered loam, grey, grey-brown in colour (02) at the eastern stratigraphic wall at the level of 1090.985. The accumulation, measuring 0.8 x 0.5 m, is elongated from south to north (coordinates 34858.777 14360497.623).

During the sorting of the stones and chips of burnt bricks, three fragments of ceramic items belonging to thin-walled unglazed red clay water vessels, and two fragments of a bowl with green-brown glaze were found (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 11).

 

Code ST_22_01_06

Element 6

Element description

Accumulation of bones and ceramics at the western stratigraphic wall of the excavation.

During the clearing of a dense lumpy-layered loam, grey, grey-brown in colour, (02) along the western stratigraphic wall of the excavation at the level of 1090.431 (coordinates 348575.077 14360500.276), an accumulation of bones belonging to cattle, sheep and goats was discovered and cleared. Fragments of white glazed ceramics can be traced in the accumulation, as well as fragments of ceramics with green-brown glaze, the thickness of the walls of which reaches 2 cm (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 12).

 

Code ST_22_01_07

Element 7

Element description

Ash pit in the north-eastern corner of the excavation.

A heap of small and medium-sized black charcoal fragments was found in the north-eastern corner at the level of 1090.858 (coordinates 348582.239 14360500.043). The ash pit is located between the northern and eastern walls of the excavation. The element was revealed when clearing a dense loamy layer of light brown colour.

The ash pit is actually adjacent to an accumulation of stones (4) located along the northern stratigraphic wall of the excavation, while being actually on the same level (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 13).

 

Code ST_22_01_08

Element 8

Element description

A layer of dense grey-brown loam.

A layer of dense grey-brown loam, traced at the level of 1090.824, 1090.840 1090.847, 1090.824. In the southern part of the excavation, when a layer 30 cm deep was removed, changes in the density and colour of the layer were recorded on the surface. The soil in this part is more loose, lumpy, the colour is bright brown.  Bone fragments are visible on the surface.

After removing the layer and subsequent cleaning, elements of vessel fragments (03), accumulation of stones in the northern part of the excavation at the wall (04), accumulation of stones and chips at the eastern stratigraphic wall (05), accumulation of bones and ceramics at the western stratigraphic wall of the excavation (06), and an ash pit (7) are recorded (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 14).

Coal samples were taken for carbon 14 analysis (AMS C 14).

 

Code ST_22_01_09

Element 9

Element description

Dense loam of light grey colour.

A dense loam of light grey colour is located at the level of 1090. 702 and borders on the southern side with a layer of light brown lumpy loam, element (11).

When removing the layer, the presence of small crushed stone, medium-sized rock is observed everywhere. Large-sized rock boulders were partially cleared at the eastern wall of the excavation: 1) 30x17 cm; 2) 42x25 cm.

When cleaning the layer, fragments of water vessels, small fragments of glazed ceramics of blue colour, as well as small sheep and goat bones were found.

Along with ceramics, fragments of glassware were found. There was also a handle from a blue glass vessel. The wall has been preserved – the place of attachment of the handle. The handle is rounded in cross section (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 15).

 

Code ST_22_01_10

Element 10

Element description

Gravelly-loamy bright grey layer (lens).

A gravelly-loamy bright grey layer (lens), with clear external boundaries, is located at the level of 1090.713, bordering on the northern side with dense loam of light grey colour, element (09).

The teardrop-shaped lens, measuring 92x40 cm, is a dense structure of fine crushed stone and bright grey loam. This lens is, as it were, embedded in a thick mass of light grey loam.

When clearing this element, ceramics, bones and other traces of human activity were not found (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 16).

 

Code ST_22_01_11

Element 11

Element description

A layer of light brown lumpy loam.

A layer of light brown lumpy loam with a significant number of burnt brick fragments, medium size. See the level at 13.

A layer of light brown lumpy loam, with a significant amount of burnt bricks, medium-sized smoothed river pebbles and rock chips is located at the level of 1090.469. It adjoins on the eastern side a dense loam of light grey colour, element (09). In its structure, it has a similar content to element 13.

During the removal of the layer to a depth of 20 cm, fragments of red clay and grey clay ceramics belonging to water vessels, as well as glazed ceramics related to pialas and thin-walled bowls, were recorded in large numbers. In the layer, there are also sheep and goat bones and several small fragments of glass (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 17). 

 

Code ST_22_01_12

Element 12

Element description

A layer of dense, light grey loam

A layer of very dense loam of light grey colour, similar to element (09), is located at the level of 1090.634.

In this layer, crushed stone and medium-sized rocks can be traced. Along with this, small fragments of burnt bricks are found everywhere to a depth of 24 cm (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 18).

During the clearing, a fragment of a thin-walled metal vessel was found in the southern part of the excavation, the outer side of which is decorated with plant embossing. The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_12_01).

When clearing the layer, fragments of glass from glass vessels are found. The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_12_02).

 

Code ST_22_01_13

Element 13

Element description

A layer of bright brown lumpy loam.

A layer of bright brown lumpy loam. The described layer 13 is located at the specified levels 1090.039, 1090.174, 1090.200, 1090.221, 1090.336, 1090.365, 1090.584, 1090.605 and it is similar to the previously excavated layer 11, located a level above (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 19).

When removing the layer, a silver coin at the level of 1090.330 was found in the eastern part of the excavation 1.20 cm from the eastern edge. Bukharhudat-type silver coin (2.5 cm in diameter, 0.2 cm thick, good preservation). Purpose - tax money; Period of existence - Samanids, Karakhanids, Abbasids (IX-XII centuries A.D.); Year and mint on this type of coin was not specified. The presumptive date of this coin is the end of the IX century and the beginning of the X century. On the avers side minted the  head of the ruler, turned to the right, with a crown on his head. The image schematized, made by strokes and dots. The inscription is in Arabic and contains the invocation and name of the ruler (Baghdad Caliph al-Mahdi). On the reverse side is an altar, in the flames of which is a profile image of the ruler's head. On the sides of the altar are the guards. Images on the coin are schematized, made by strokes and dots, as on the avers.

The find is assigned a field number (St_22_01_13_01).

In the south-western part of the excavation, a bronze object was found, rectangular in shape, covered with oxide, 3.9x1.4x0.4 cm in size. The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_16_01).

A bronze belt plaque of rounded shape, 1.6 cm in diameter, with rounded through holes 0.4 cm in diameter was found next to the coin. There are two fixing pins on the inside. The pins are rounded in cross-section, 0.3 cm high. The plaque is assigned a field number (St_22_01_13_02).

During the clearing of the described layer, several fragments of glass from different vessels were found in the northern, western, south-western and central parts of the excavation. The plaque is assigned a field number (St_22_01_13_04).

A fragment of a corroded iron knife (St_22_01_13_05).

A fragment of a corroded iron item of uncertain purpose has been assigned a field number (St_22_01_13_06).

 

Code ST_22_01_14

Element 14

Element description

Chaotic heap of stones and fragments of burnt bricks.

A heap of stones (grey rock chips) and fragments of burnt bricks, stretching along the west-east line, actually parallel to element (04) is located at levels 1090.216, 1090.424.

Lines of large stones, apparently forming a part of the wall, recorded in area 02 – element (4)

The approximate length of the heap is 2.30 m, width 50-90 cm.

This element was found during the removal of a layer of light brown lumpy loam (11).

 

Code ST_22_01_15

Element 15

Element description

Accumulation of stones and fragments of burnt bricks.

The accumulation of stones and fragments of burnt bricks was randomly located at levels 1090.249, 1090.465, in a chaotic manner, mainly represented by large and medium-sized rocks of bright grey colour. The accumulation of stones was found during the removal of a layer of bright brown lumpy loam (13) (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 20).

 

Code ST_22_01_16

Element 16

Element description

A layer of lumpy, bright brown, sandy loam.

A layer of lumpy, bright brown, sandy loam was cleared at the levels of 1090. 040, 1080.198, 1090.215, 1090.364. The filling contains a large number of small pebbles, chipped fragments of burnt bricks.

The surface of the layer clearly appeared after removing layer (13) of loam, lumpy brown colour. The layer is similar to layer (10).

In the south-western part of the excavation, a bronze object was found, rectangular in shape, covered with oxide, 3.9x1.4x0.4 cm in size. The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_16_01) (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 21).

 

Code ST_22_01_17

Element 17

Element description

A layer of lumpy loam, bright brown colour, with the inclusion of fine crushed stones.

When clearing the layer of lumpy, bright brown loam, with the inclusion of fine crushed stones, small and medium fragments of burnt bricks, fragments of water vessels were found in the form of walls, rims and bottom parts. Part of the walls was decorated with a scratched horizontal, straight and wavy ornament

A bronze rectangular belt plaque with four pins was found in the eastern part of the excavation. The plaque is covered with green oxide. The plaque is assigned a field number (St_22_01_17_01).

An iron forged nail, square in cross section, was found next to the plaque. The nail head has not been preserved. The size of the nail is 7.1x0.4-08 cm. The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_17_02).

When clearing the layer in the western and southern parts of the excavation, an accumulation of rocky stones, as well as fragments of broken burnt bricks was found. In this layer there are small fragments of glass from vessels.

Small fragments of a glass vessel with a handle were found. The colour of the glass is light green. The fragments are assigned a field number (St_22_01_17_03).

In different parts of the excavation, when removing the layer, small fragments of glass from different vessels were found. 5 fragments were found, which were assigned a field number (St_22_01_17_04).

A fragment of a glass handle from a green vessel was found. Handle length – 2 cm, thickness – 0.7 cm.

In the eastern part of the excavation, when removing the layer, a fragment of facing ceramic tile was found, measuring 7.5 x 5.5 x 1 cm. The front side of the tile is covered with beige paint. The tile was assigned a field number (St_22_01_17_05) (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 22).

 

Code ST_22_01_18

Element 18

Element description

A layer of lumpy, brownish, bright brown colour, with the inclusion of small crushed stones, rock stones.

A layer of lumpy, brownish, bright-brown colour, with the inclusion of small crushed stones, as well as medium and large-sized rock stones, in the centre of the excavation.

Large stones forming separate heaps can be traced in the western, eastern and northern parts of the excavation.

Fine crushed stones, found everywhere in the layers of elements (11, 12, 14, 16), in the layers of elements 17 and 18, when those are cleared, shrink towards the centre and west of the excavation in the form of depressions. In place of a bright brown sandy loam layer, comes a dense light yellow loam layer (28), which in turn, after cleaning, forms a kind of light yellow loamy alluvial area between a stone-loamy border (25) from the north and an accumulation of stones (21). In this described layer, when clearing, fragments of red clay and grey clay ceramics belonging to water vessels, pot-shaped vessels, are found.

Fragments of a ceramic tagor basin were found in the north-western corner of the excavation during the clearing of the layer on an area of 57x72 cm. The fragments were located at different depths. On the inside, the walls of the tagor are decorated with a slip cross of dark brown colour.

Clearing the layer in the northern part of the excavation, a fragment of a glass handle from a glass vessel with a partially preserved wall at the place of attachment of the handle was found near the wall (4). The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_18_01).

A copper plate coated with green oxide was found, measuring 1.5 x 0.8 x 0.2 cm. The find was assigned a field number: (St_22_01_18_02).

When clearing the ground, agate with chipped areas was found in the north-eastern corner of the excavation. The size of the agate is 3x2.6 cm.

Clearing the layer at the northern wall of the excavation, a twisted bronze hairpin, partially deformed, was found. The lower part of the hairpin is sharp. The upper part is flattened. The find was assigned a field number: (St_22_01_18_03).

In the north-western corner of the excavation, when clearing a layer 60 cm thick from the found fragments of the vessel, a fragment of the wall of a cast-iron cauldron was found near the previously cleared wall (4). The cauldron wall is curved, 6.2 cm long, 1.9-3.2 cm wide, 0.5 cm thick. The wall is covered with brown corrosion. The find was assigned a field number: (St_22_01_18_04).

Clearing a layer of grey loose lumpy loam with the presence of fine crushed stones and rock in the northern part of the excavation, a corroded iron object of undefined purpose was found. Apparently, these are fragments of an iron vessel. The find was assigned a field number: (St_22_01_18_06).

When the northern part of the excavation was cleared to a depth of a spade head, a dense accumulation of stones was found, covered with a layer of grey loose lumpy loam (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 23-24).

 

Code ST_22_01_19

Element 19

Element description

A bulb-shaped spot with organic contents in the north of the excavation.

Clearing a layer of dense grey loam along the wall (4), traces of organic contents of grey-black colour were found; they had the form of a bulb-shaped spot stretching from east to west. The spot was 1.68 m long, 3-4 cm deep. The rounded part of the spot is 45 cm in diameter. From the rounded spot to the west stretched a straight wide line 1.23 m long, 18-20 cm wide.

When clearing the spot, 3 fragments of ceramics were found in the organic content: two belonged to red clay manufactured vessels, one to glazed vessels – a bowl (lagan). After clearing the spot, a fragment of burnt brick measuring 13x15x5 cm was found on the loam (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 25).

 

Code ST_22_01_20

Element 20

Element description

An accumulation of rock stones in the eastern part of the excavation.

The cluster of rock stones in the eastern part of the excavation consists of 54 large, medium and small stones. The largest stone is 31x22x13 cm in size. Medium sized stones 2) 40x14x12; 3) 18x16x12 cm; 4) 25x14x8cm. The stones were measured selectively. The largest and smallest stones were taken.

The space between the stones was filled with fine crushed stone and loam.

The area of the accumulation is 1.88 x 1.25 m (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 26).

 

Code ST_22_01_21

Element 21

Element description

An accumulation of rock stones in the southern part of the excavation.

The accumulation of rock stones is located along the southern part of the excavation. In the described accumulation there are 25 stones of different sizes. The accumulation of stones has two adjacent branches. The first branch stretches from east to west and has a length of 1.82 m and a width of 53 cm. The second branch stretches along the southern wall of the excavation and is 2.45 m long, 85 cm wide.

The size of the stones of the first branch of the accumulation: 1) 48x22x13 cm 2) 30x23x13 cm; 3) 20x10x6 cm.

Stone sizes in the second accumulation: 1) 35x19x14 cm (part of the stone is located in the edge outside the excavation; 2) 25x10x6 cm; 3) 27x17x10 cm; 4) 21x20x19 cm; 5) 30x13x13 cm. 6) 18x13x8 cm 7) 32x28x17 cm; 8) 14x11x8 cm; 9) 30x20x6-8 cm.

During the clearing, the accumulation of stones was covered by a layer of lumpy, brownish loam, with the inclusion of small crushed stones (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 27).

 

Code ST_22_01_22

Element 22

Element description

Accumulation of fragments of vessels.

During the removal of a layer of lumpy, brownish, bright brown colour, with the inclusion of small crushed stones, (18) an accumulation of fragments of vessels was found 2 m from the southern wall of the excavation.

When sorting the accumulation, unglazed ceramics belonging to water and pot-shaped red clay and grey clay vessels were found in it. Fragments of glazed ceramics belonging to a bowl are also found in the accumulation. The ceramics are covered with white and blue glaze (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 28). 

 

Code ST_22_01_23

Element 23

Element description

An accumulation of rock stones in the western part of the excavation.

Clearing a layer of lumpy loam of brown and bright brown colour along the western wall of the excavation, we found an accumulation of large, medium and small rock stones numbering 28. The space between the stones was filled with fine crushed stone and loam.

The stones were originally located on an area of 2.71x1.99m. The size of the stones in the accumulation: 1) 41x39x8 cm 2) 35x30x11 cm; 3) 50x24x21 cm; 4) 31x25x7 cm; 5) 25x11x10 cm. The stones were measured selectively. The largest and smallest stones were taken.

Later, as we dug deeper by 30 cm and finished cleared the accumulation of stones, an accumulation of stones lying on an earlier cultural layer was completely cleared, too.

The accumulation of rock stones is located in the western part of the excavation, and consists of 60 large, medium and small stones: 1) 56x16x19 cm (the rest of the stone is located outside the excavation); 2) 42x37x10 cm (located in the centre of the excavation); 3) 37x25x13 cm; 4) 38x26x14 cm; 5) 23x15x6 cm. The stones were measured selectively. The largest and smallest stones were taken.

The space between the stones was filled with fine crushed stone and loam.

The size of the accumulation is 3.67 m from north-east to south-west, from east to west – 2.94 m.

A fragment of burnt brick was found next to the stones. The brick size is 16.5x17.5x5 cm (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 29).

 

Code ST_22_01_24

Element 24

Element description

An accumulation of stones in the north-western corner of the excavation.

An accumulation of stones can be traced in the north-western corner of the excavation. The stones lie in a heap stretching in the north-south direction. The area of the accumulation is 1.67 m from north to south, and 67 cm from west to east. The number of stones is 16.

The rock stones ares of medium size, sizes vary 1) 30x21x10 cm; 2) 16x13x12 cm; 3) 32x15x4-6 cm; 4) 16x14x5 cm; 5) 15x5x6 cm.

A fragment of burnt brick, measuring 16x11x5 cm, was found on top of the stones when clearing the accumulation.

This accumulation was covered with a layer of grey compacted loam with the inclusion of fine crushed stones (17, 18, 28) (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 30).

 

Code ST_22_01_25

Element 25

Element description

Loam-stone structure – border.

The accumulation of rock stones in the north-eastern corner of the excavation consists of large and medium-sized rock boulders, embedded in or laid on loamy soil. The space between the stones is filled with loam. Stone sizes: 1) 43x22x16 cm; 2) 46x24x10 cm; 3) 11x16x11 cm; 4) 33x25x14 cm; 5) 28x9x7 cm. The stones were measured selectively. The largest and smallest stones were taken.

The initial area of the accumulation of rocks is 1.90x0.50 m.

Further, as we excavated deeper and continued to reveal the accumulation of stones, a loam-stone masonry was revealed – a curb located on the southern part of the stone pavement (30).

The loam-stone stonework is made of large and medium-sized stones covered with loam, as well as small-sized rock stones. Initially, it was an accumulation of large boulders at the level of 1.30 cm, buried in and laid on a loamy surface. The largest stones have sizes: 1) 65x69x25 cm; 2) 44x24x10 cm; 3) 43x22x16 cm; 4) 33x25x14 cm.

Smaller stones in the stonework have sizes: 1) 28x9x7 cm; 2) 11x16x11 cm; 3) 33x25x14 cm (large and medium-sized stones were selected for measurement).

The original area of the wall, which appeared as an accumulation of stones, was 1.90 x 50 cm. Then, as we deepened during the clearing of the loamy site by 40-50 cm from east to west, larger boulders lying flat along the supposed stone platform (stone pavement) were found under the upper masonry of small and medium-sized stones. The masonry of the stones is even and in the eastern part slowly descends, making a kind of deflection, and then in the western part it rises sharply upwards.

There, in the western part, an accumulation of stones and fragments of bricks can be traced on the surface of the masonry (24, 26). Presumably, the rest of the stonework of the curb may be hidden outside the excavation (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 31-32).

 

Code ST_22_01_26

Element 26

Element description

An accumulation of stones in the north-western part of the excavation

An accumulation of rock stones is located in the north-western part of the excavation. The accumulation of rock stones was revealed when removing layers of bright brown loam with the inclusion of fine crushed stone and chipped small rocks.

The area is regular and the accumulation is uniform, consisting of large and medium-sized rock stones. The stones lie at different depths and levels. The size of the accumulation from north to south is 1.32 m, from east to west – 1.63 m.

 

Code ST_22_01_27

Element 27

Element description

A layer of grey loose lumpy loam

A layer of grey loose lumpy loam can be traced in the south-eastern corner, partly in the central part. The described layer continues along the western wall of the excavation, as well as in the northern part of the excavation. Clearing a layer of grey loose lumpy loam with the presence of small crushed stones and rock stones in the south-western corner of the excavation, we found a thin copper plate of a pentagonal shape, which was identified as a coin. The coin was lying between an accumulation of rock stones and fragments of burnt bricks. The coin size is 2.1x1.9x0.2 cm. The find was assigned a field number: (St_22_01_27_01) (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 33).

 

Code ST_22_01_28

Element 28

Element description

A layer of thick light grey loose lumpy loam

A layer of thick light grey loose lumpy loam with the presence of fine crushed stones was found in the northern part of the excavation. The described element was revealed during the clearing of a layer of lumpy light brown loam, with the inclusion of fine crushed stones, fragments of ceramics, chipped rocks of medium and small size. Clearing the upper layer at the eastern wall at a depth of 1.50 m, we discovered a dense compacted light grey loam, which formed a 10-15 cm cover for a stonework of boulders stretching from east to west 4.7 m. Compacted light grey loam, with the inclusion of small fragments of ceramics, as well as small charcoal fragments, is spread along the entire length and width of the stone pavement, covering the latter. After clearing the loam surface, the stone pavement appeared, composed of river boulders.

The surface of the cleared compacted loam, as well as the stone pavement hidden under it, is 4.70 m long, 2.10 m wide.

 

Code ST_22_01_29

Element 29

Element description

Light yellow dense alluvial loam.

The light yellow dense alluvial loam, heterogenous in composition, with an area of 5.20x4.90 m, 20-40 cm thick, is located in the central part, as well as between the eastern and southern walls of the excavation. In the south-eastern part, the loam is thick, up to 70 cm, then to the centre, to the north, towards the south and west, the alluvial loam slowly thins, as if spreading out, forming a kind of slope.

Along the southern wall of the excavation, the loamy mass coveres an elongated accumulation of rock stones of different sizes stretching along the wall (21).

On the eastern side, the accumulation of stones (20, 25) is also covered by a layer of light yellow loam. The upper horizon of the light yellow mass is covered from above by a layer of grey lumpy loam, crushed stones, small and medium-sized rock stones, among which there are fragments of red clay and grey clay ceramics, glazed fragments of bowls and pialas decorated with green, blue and dark blue glaze, with brown geometric and floral ornaments. The upper layer is made of grey lumpy loam, crushed stones, small and medium-sized rock stones, covering a massive layer of light grey loam by 30-40 cm.

Sloping towards the centre of the excavation, the layer of light yellow loamy mass is covered with a layer of grey lumpy loam, with the inclusion of crushed stones, small and medium-sized rock stones; in the excavated layers (10, 13, 16, 17, 18) the loamy mass grows increasingly more compact and gradually becomes from grey to light yellow in colour.

Along the eastern and southern walls of the excavation, an accumulation of rock stones continues to be recorded; they stretch along the south-north (east border), west-east (21, 25) and southeast-northwest (21) axes.

In the northern part of the excavation, this loamy mass is broken by an accumulation of small and medium-sized rock stones stretching from east to west.

During further clearing of the layer of dense light yellow alluvial loamy mass, ceramics and animal bones are not found in either the south and east or the centre of the excavation (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 34).

 

Code ST_22_01_30

Element 30

Element description

Boulder pavement along the northern wall of the excavation.

Clearing a layer of lumpy light brown loam with the inclusion of small crushed stones, fragments of ceramics, chipped rocks of medium and small size at the eastern wall at a depth of 1.50 m, we discovered a layer of dense light grey loam (28), which formed a 10-15 cm thick cover for a stonework of boulders stretching from east to west for 4.7 m. The compacted light grey loam included small fragments of ceramics, as well as small charcoal fragments. After clearing the loam surface at the levels 1089.616, 1089.681, 1089.953, 1089.969, a stone pavement composed of river boulders appeared.

Boulders are tightly fitted to each other, and the space between the stones is filled with loam.

On the southern side of the stone pavement, as we excavated from east to west, we found a curb 4.20 m long, up to 1 m wide, made of rock stones, the space between which was filled and with clay mortar. On the northern side there is a stone-adobe (pakhsa) wall (4) stretching in the east-west direction.

The surface of the cleared stone pavement is 4.70 m long, 2.10 m wide (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 35-36).

 


 

Description of finds from monastery

 

A fragment of glazed ceramics (St_22_01_01_01), with blue and brown glaze, as well as a fragment of green-glazed ceramics (St_22_01_01_02) were found.

A fragment of green glazed ceramics (St_22_01_01_03) was found in the south-western part of the excavation.

In the south-western part of the excavation, two fragments of glazed ceramics white-brown hue (St_22_01_01_04), (St_22_01_01_05), a fragment of a bowl (identified by a rim) decorated with green glaze (St_22_01_01_06) were found.

A fragment of unglazed ceramics, a square with a stamp with an impressed image of a cross (St_22_01_01_21), as well as a fragment of glass (St_22_01_01_22).

During the removal of the layer, several ferrous metal items were found: a rounded plate (St_22_01_02_01), a fragment of a nail (St_22_01_02_02), a rectangular plate (St_22_01_02_04).

A molar tooth of a predatory animal (wolf?) was found among the heap of bones. The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_02_03) (see Appendix “Artefacts from the monastery”, fig. 2).

A fragment of a thin-walled metal vessel, on the outside of which the wall is decorated with floral embossing. The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_12_01) (see Appendix “Artefacts from the monastery”, fig. 6).

Fragments of glass from glass vessels. The find was assigned a field number: (St_22_01_12_05).

Bukharhudat-type silver coin (2.5 cm in diameter, 0.2 cm thick, good preservation). Purpose - tax money; Period of existence - Samanids, Karakhanids, Abbasids (IX-XII centuries A.D.); Year and mint on this type of coin was not specified. The presumptive date of this coin is the end of the IX century and the beginning of the X century. On the avers side minted the  head of the ruler, turned to the right, with a crown on his head. The image schematized, made by strokes and dots. The inscription is in Arabic and contains the invocation and name of the ruler (Baghdad Caliph al-Mahdi). On the reverse side is an altar, in the flames of which is a profile image of the ruler's head. On the sides of the altar are the guards. Images on the coin are schematized, made by strokes and dots, as on the avers. The find is assigned a field number (St_22_01_13_01) (see Appendix “Artefacts from the monastery”, fig. 27).

A bronze object, rectangular shape, coated with oxide, size 3.9x1.4x0.4 cm. The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_16_01).

A bronze belt plaque of rounded shape, 1.6 cm in diameter, with rounded through holes 0.4 cm in diameter. There are two fixing pins on the inside. The pins are rounded in cross-section, 0.3 cm high. The plaque is assigned a field number (St_22_01_13_02) (see Appendix “Artefacts from the monastery”, fig. 9).

Fragments of glass from different vessels. The finds were assigned a field number (St_22_01_13_04).

A fragment of a corroded iron knife (St_22_01_13_05).

A fragment of a corroded iron item of uncertain purpose has been assigned a field number (St_22_01_13_06).

A bronze object, rectangular shape, coated with oxide, size 3.9x1.4x0.4 cm. The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_16_01).

Rectangular bronze belt plaque with four pins. The plaque is covered with green oxide. The plaque is assigned a field number (St_22_01_17_01) (see Appendix “Artefacts from the monastery”, fig. 19).

Iron forged nail, square in cross-section. The nail head has not been preserved. The size of the nail is 7.1x0.4-08 cm. The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_17_02).

Small fragments of a glass vessel with a handle. The colour of the glass is light green. The fragments are assigned a field number (St_22_01_17_03).

Small fragments of glass from different vessels. 5 fragments were found, which were assigned a field number (St_22_01_17_04).

A fragment of a glass handle from a green vessel was found. Handle length – 2 cm, thickness – 0.7 cm.

Fragment of facing ceramic tile, size 7.5x5.5x1 cm. The front side of the tile is covered with beige paint. The tile was assigned a field number (St_22_01_17_05).

Fragments of a ceramic tagor basin. The fragments were located at different depths. On the inside, the walls of the tagor are decorated with a slip cross of dark brown colour (St_22_01_1) (see Appendix “Artefacts from the monastery”, fig. 15).

Fragment of a glass handle from a glass vessel with a partially preserved wall at the place of the attachment of the handle. The find was assigned a field number (St_22_01_18_01).

Copper plate coated with green oxide, size 1.5 x 0.8 x 0.2 cm. The find was assigned a field number: (St_22_01_18_02).

Twisted bronze hairpin, partially deformed, found when clearing a layer at the northern wall of the excavation. The lower part of the hairpin is sharp. The upper part is flattened. The find was assigned a field number: (St_22_01_18_03) (see Appendix “Artefacts from the monastery”, fig. 24).

In the north-western corner of the excavation, when clearing a layer 60 cm thick from the found fragments of the vessel, a fragment of the wall of a cast-iron cauldron was found near the previously cleared wall (4). The cauldron wall is curved, 6.2 cm long, 1.9-3.2 cm wide, 0.5 cm thick. The wall is covered with brown corrosion. The find was assigned a field number: (St_22_01_18_04).

When clearing the ground, agate with chipped areas was found in the north-eastern corner of the excavation. The size of the agate is 3x2.6 cm. The find was assigned a field number: (St_22_01_18_05).

Fragments of an iron vessel were found in a layer of grey loose lumpy loam in the northern part of the excavation. the fragments of the iron vessel are covered with traces of corrosion. Judging by the damages of the object, it is believed to be fragments of an iron vessel. The find was assigned a field number: (St_22_01_18_06).

A copper coin was found during the clearing of a layer of grey loose lumpy loam with the presence of small crushed stones and rock stones in the south-western corner of the excavation. The coin was lying between an accumulation of rock stones and fragments of burnt bricks. The coin is in the form of a thin pentagonal copper plate with a size of 2.1x1.9x0.2 cm. The find was assigned a field number: (St_22_01_27_01) (see Appendix “Artefacts from the monastery”, fig. 26).


 

Conclusion for Excavation ST (monastery)

 

In 2022, archaeological excavations were resumed on the territory of the previously partially excavated medieval Christian monastery Suleyman-tepa. Three excavations were made on the territory of the monastery: excavation No. 1 was outside the monastery in its south-western part, the excavation has a trapezoidal shape, stretching from north to south, dimensions 8x7 m: excavation No. 2 is located east of excavation No. 1, also outside the monastery; it was made on the site of an old test trench, which was expanded to the size of 4.7x2.8 metres and stretched along the WE line; excavation No. 3 is located inside the monastery along the southern wall (dimensions 10.5x0.5 m).

During the excavations on site No. 1, several upper alluvial layers were revealed, dated to the period of abandonment, when after the Mongol invasion the monastery was deserted.

On the northern side, a partially excavated southern stone-loam wall (4) of the monastery was cleared.

Digging a layer of soil along the stone wall, we found traces of fire on the upper level, at a depth of 35 cm from the upper level; it was located on a partially destroyed wall. This fire burned at the time when the monastery was deserted, and the burnt bricks of the buildings, apparently, were taken away by local residents who lived in some other places for construction and other purposes.

Large boulders were revealed in the central and lower parts of the wall brickwork.

During the excavations a cobblestone pavement was cleared below the wall at a depth of 1.5-1.6 m. It was covered with dense light grey loam, which covered the masonry of boulders by 10-15 cm, stretching from east to west for 4.7 m. The compacted light grey loam included small fragments of ceramics and small charcoals. Under the light grey loam, the stonework of a stone pavement composed of river boulders was revealed. The surface of the cleared stone pavement is 6.5 m long, 2.4 m wide.

Boulders are tightly fitted to each other, and the space between the stones is filled with loam. A part of the stonework on the western side of the pavement is located outside the excavation. On the eastern side, a part of the pavement was disassembled during previous excavations. The true dimensions of the pavement were not established.

On the southern side of the stone pavement, as we excavated from east to west, we found a curb 4.20 m long, up to 1 m wide, made of rock stones, the space between which was filled and with clay mortar. On the northern side there is a stone-adobe (pakhsa) wall (4) stretching in the east-west direction.

During the excavations, accumulations of stones, the origin of which is not clear, were cleared from the southern and western sides of the curb at different levels and throughout the area. Apparently, these are the remains of the stonework of the curb or wall that collapsed after the abandonment or during the disassembly of the structures.

During the excavations, a fragmented ceramic tagor basin was discovered on this excavation site; it is decorated from the inside with an image of a cross. The cross is made with dark brown paint. This basin was found in the upper tiers, during the clearing of the wall on the southern side and the accumulation of stones that covered the pavement in the western part (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 37-38, 43-45, Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 33-35).

Along with manufactured red and grey clay ceramics, represented by fragments of water vessels and cauldrons, there are also fragments of glazed ceramic bowls and a piala, blue, white, green and brown colours.

Bukharhudat-type silver coin (2.5 cm in diameter, 0.2 cm thick, good preservation). Purpose - tax money; Period of existence - Samanids, Karakhanids, Abbasids (IX-XII centuries A.D.); Year and mint on this type of coin was not specified. The presumptive date of this coin is the end of the IX century and the beginning of the X century. On the avers side minted the  head of the ruler, turned to the right, with a crown on his head. The image schematized, made by strokes and dots. The inscription is in Arabic and contains the invocation and name of the ruler (Baghdad Caliph al-Mahdi). On the reverse side is an altar, in the flames of which is a profile image of the ruler's head. On the sides of the altar are the guards. Images on the coin are schematized, made by strokes and dots, as on the avers. Attribution of the coin afte Luke Treadwell (2007) is following: type 10 (bi-ism allāh muḥammad rasūl allāh muḥammadiyya mimmā amara bi-hi al-amīnʿalī (ʿalā [yaday]?) sulaymān lillāh) was tentatively dated by Walker to the years 193-195 A.H. (Walker 1941). Masson (1955) dates them to Tahirid period.  However 193 A.H. was the year in which the principal mints of Transoxania, Samarqand and Bukhara, began to mint large quantities of regular caliphal dirhams bearing the name of Amīn's brother, al-Ma’mūn (the only Transoxanian mint to have struck silver dirhams before 193 A.H. was the mint of Shash which produced massive quantities in the years 189–190 A.H): it is likely, as Walker (1941) noted, that the beginning of regular dirham production coincided with the end of the Bukharkhuda series. Therefore it seems reasonable to assume that Type 10 was minted during the reign of Amīn's father, Hārūn, possibly as early as 176 A.H., when Amīn's title first appears on dirhams of al-Muḥammadiya (Treadwell 2007).

A bronze belt plaque of rounded shape, 1.6 cm in diameter, with rounded through holes 0.4 cm in diameter was found next to the coin. There are two fixing pins on the inside. The pins are rounded in cross-section, 0.3 cm high.

When removing the loamy layer covering the pavement, a twisted bronze hairpin was found, partially deformed; it was found at the northern wall of the excavation. The lower part of the hairpin is sharp. The upper part is flattened.

Removing a layer of grey loose lumpy loam with the presence of small crushed stones and rocks in the south-western corner of the excavation between the accumulation of rock stones and fragments of burnt bricks, a coin in the form of a thin copper plate, pentagonal in shape, sized 2.1x1.9x0.2 cm, was found.

During the excavations, a layer of turf, and 20-30 cm of relatively loose loam of grey-brown colour were removed. Apparently, the loam layer is made up of the debris from the excavations of previous years and a layer of soil used as a preservation material (filling).

To the east of excavation No. 1, excavation No. 2 was marked on the site of a round-shaped pit, up to 1.5 m deep.

The pit is an eroded trench made by archaeologists to find out the thickness of the southern (outer) wall of the monastery (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 46-47, Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 36).

Excavation No. 3 is made on the eastern and northern sides in relation to excavation No. 1. The main purpose is to clear the earlier excavated structures, combine plans of structures studied recently and in previous years, and clarify details (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 44-46, Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 37-38).

During the excavations, two niches and steps of burnt bricks were cleared. Presumably, the large niche was once the entrance from the southern side to the church, which could be reached through the already cleared stone pavement along the southern wall. In the small niche, a carved brick, never recorded during previous work, was found amid the brickwork. The purpose of the small niche could not be specified. The exact boundaries of the brickwork of the walls and the work of the southern adobe-stone wall were established.

Result: during the excavations on the southern side of the wall from the previously excavated monastic structures, a curb made of large and small rock stones was revealed, bordering the stone pavement from the outside. A cobblestone pavement has also been cleared, which had traces of damage, subsequent repair and covering at a later time with compacted dense loam. The monastery wall was cleared from the southern side, with damaged work of stones and pakhsa (adobe). There are traces of destruction and erosion from the outside, which occurred after the monastery had been in the late 13th century. All this suggests that after the 13th century, life stopped on the territory of the monastery, and resumed only in the early 20th century, when the monastery was in a ruined state, covered with a layer of soil and thick vegetation.


 

Excavation ST_1 (Graveyard)

 

Urgut_2022

Emergency burial ground Suleiman tepa 1.

The Suleiman tepa 1 burial ground, discovered in April 2022, is located on a mountain slope formed on the western side of a range by a grey-bluish rock outcrop. The ground pits are arranged in loamy loess deposits of brown colour, rather loose.

On the slope there are irrigated plots, terraces with a network of canals stretching along the west-east line. Fruit trees cultivated: cherry, apple, walnut, hawthorn, as well as dog rose bushes and vines. The grass cover is very dense. The northern part of the slope was destroyed by heavy machinery during the preparation of the site for the construction of a residential building (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 4-5).

In the profile formed during the removal of soil using an excavator, at the time of the beginning of archaeological research, three sections of exposed bone remains (burials) were seen: two in the southern profile (01, 02) and one in the eastern one (03).

Where the ground was cut, in several places, fragmented grey-bluish rocks are visible.

To study the exposed burials, a 23x8-meter excavation pit was dug (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 48-50).

Suleman Tepa 1 (ST_1) is the designation for the site of the discovered remains first found in April 2022 near the city of Urgut, Uzbekistan. Because the owner of the house at the site was about to continue removing part of the mountainside with excavation equipment, a rescue excavation of the area due south of the newly constructed domicile was undertaken. Originally a 10 x 10 m trench had been delineated the previous day, however, on Sept. 6, an excavator tractor appeared on the scene with the specific purpose of removing more soil from the northern hillside which had already yielded human remains from previous work that had occurred at least as early as October 2020, and additional work that occurred after April 2022. In addition, a single-story domicile was constructed on this area of cleared land between April 2022 and September 2022. A previous grave discovered at the site in April 2022 as seen in the northern profile was now removed due to removal by excavation equipment, however, 3 additional graves were seen in the altered profile, once again confirming that the site was a cemetery.

Additionally, human bones were again seen in and around the territory. These were bagged and later measured and analyzed. We were also informed by local residents that the bones that have been discovered in the course of excavations were collected and buried in a common pit. This pit’s location was known and examined.

Archaeological team then hired the mechanical excavator to remove the upper 80 to 100 cm of soil on the mountainside to more quickly access the suspected graves to prevent further damage due to construction. The area excavated and revealed due to the use of the heavy equipment was considerably larger than the previously marked out 10 x 10 m trench, and became a 23 x 8 m trench with a terrace in between running E/W (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 6-8).

Following the previous day’s clearing by the mechanical excavator, the area of ST 1 was leveled using hand shovels and picks.

Once the area was cleared and swept by a mechanical blower, initially 8 graves and locations with human skeletal remains were revealed. Three of these were in the north profile, as mentioned above, and designated as Elements 01, 02, and 03. These remains were easily seen in the large profile cut done by the previous construction work.


 

List of graves and related elements

Grave#1 – element 07, 23 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 9);

Grave#2 – element 08, 28, 29, 33 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 10);

Grave#3 – element 60, 61, 62, 63 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 11);

Grave#4 – element 10, 34 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 12);

Grave#5 – element 11, 35, 36, 39 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 13);

Grave#6 – element 05, 22 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 14);

Grave#7 – element 15, 43, 51, 52, 56 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 15);

Grave#8 – element 44, 45, 46 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 16);

Grave#9 – element 14, 37, 38, 40 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 17);

Grave#10 – element 18, 53, 54, 55, 57 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 18);

Grave#11 – element 17, 26, 27, 41 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 19);

Grave#12 – element 06, 31 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 20);

Grave#13 – element 09, 24, 25, 30 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 21);

Grave#14 – element 12, 13, 19, 20, 21 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 22);

Grave#15 – element 47, 48, 49, 50 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 23);

Grave#16 – element 02, 64 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 24);

Grave#17 – element 58, 59 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 25);

 

List of elements

Element 01. Exposed bone remains

Element 02. Exposed bone remains

Element 03. Exposed bone remains

Element 06. Burial chamber

Element 07. Burial chamber

Element 08. Entrance ground pit

Element 09. Entrance ground pit

Element 10. Burial chamber

Element 11. Entrance ground pit

Element 12. Burial chamber

Element 13. Entrance ground pit

Element 14. Entrance ground pit

Element 15. Entrance ground pit

Element 16. Entrance ground pit

Element 17. Entrance ground pit

Element 18. Entrance ground pit

Element 19. Mud brickwork

Element 20. Mud brick blockage

Element 21. Skeleton

Element 22. Skeleton

Element 23. Skeleton

Element 24. Mud brickwork

Element 25. Burial chamber

Element 26. Skeleton

Element 27. Mud brickwork (partition)

Element 28. Mud brickwork

Element 29. Burial chamber

Element 30. Skeleton

Element 31. Skeleton

Element 32. Pit

Element 33. Skeleton

Element 34. Skeleton

Element 35. Mud brickwork

Element 36. Skeleton

Element 37. Mud brickwork

Element 38. Burial chamber

Element 39. Burial chamber

Element 41. Burial chamber

Element 43. Mud brickwork

Element 44_1, 2. Mud bricks/ Mud brickwork

Element 45. Burial chamber

Element 46. Skeleton

Element 47. Burial chamber

Element 48. Skeleton

Element 49. Entrance ground pit

Element 50. Mud brickwork

Element 51. Burial chamber

Element 52. Ceramic lamp

Element 53. Mud brickwork

Element 54. Burial chamber

Element 55. Skeleton

Element 56. Skeleton

Element 57. Brick blockage

Element 58. Burial chamber

Element 59. Skeleton

Element 60. Entrance ground pit

Element 61. Mud brickwork

Element 62. Burial chamber

Element 63. Skeleton

Element 64. Burial chamber


 

Code ST1_22_01_01

Element 01

Element description

Exposed bone remains (one bone) were recorded in the eastern part of the cut of the soil on the southern slope, made during activities to create a terrace for the construction of a residential building.

Element (01) is spatially located to the east of element (02).

Visually, the exposed bone remains are located in a layer of brown loam, where it passes into a layer of light grey dense loam.

 

Code ST1_22_01_02

Element 02

Element description

Exposed bone remains (one bone) were recorded in the eastern part of the cut of the soil on the southern slope, made during activities to create a terrace for the construction of a residential building.

Element (02) is spatially located to the west of element (01).

Visually, the exposed bone remains are located in a layer of brown loam, where it passes into a layer of light grey dense loam (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 54).

 

Code ST1_22_01_03

Element 03

Element description

Exposed bone remains (one bone) were recorded in the eastern part of the cut of the soil on the southern slope, made during activities to create a terrace for the construction of a residential building.

Element (3) is spatially located to the west of element (01).

The bone apparently fell out of a burial, located somewhat higher, and lied on a small ledge formed by the teeth of the excavator bucket.

 

Code ST1_22_01_06

Element 06

Element description

Altitudes

1151.024

Burial chamber

Located in the western part of the excavation, most of the pit destroyed during construction activities. The lower contour of the pit with dimensions of 120x70 cm has been preserved, the pit is oriented along the WE line. The eastern part of the pit was originally 10 cm deeper than the western one, but after the removal of the soil, the bottom was levelled and the skeleton lay on the flat floor of the upper level.

The shape of the chamber is oval (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 59-62).

 

Code ST1_22_01_07

Element 07

Element description

Altitudes

Top 1151.511

Bottom 1151.276

Burial chamber

Dimensions recorded on the surface:

Length 170-178 cm (current)

Width 57 cm (at the feet)

The chamber is a roughly rectangular shape, with rounded corners, oriented along the NW-SE line. Filling – loose loam of bright brown colour.

The skeleton (23) is in a fragmentary state (partially destroyed by construction machinery), which indicate that the buried person was laid on their back in a stretched position, NW-SE orientation. The bones are large, indicating the mature age of the buried person (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 63-65).

 

Code ST1_22_01_08

Element 08

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1151.564

Bottom 1151.439

An entrance ground pit, which is one of the structural elements of a burial consisting of the following components:

(08) – entrance ground pit;

(29) – mud brickwork blocking a passage between (49) and (47);

(28) – burial chamber;

(33) – skeleton.

The entrance ground pit has practically not been preserved, it has a roughly rectangular shape, the corners are rounded. The dimensions of the pit are 66-68x93 cm, the present-day depth is 27 cm.

The entrance pit is oriented along the NW-SE line, longitudinally passes into a burial chamber (29), while the burial chamber is located east of the entrance pit.

In the eastern wall of the entrance pit there is a passage 55 cm wide leading to a burial chamber. The passage narrows with the help of two protrusions (northern and southern) cut in the loamy mass of the mainland. The length of the southern protrusion is 30 cm, the width is 10 cm. The length of the northern protrusion is 36 cm, width 12 cm (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 66-70).

 

Code ST1_22_01_09

Element 09 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 27)

Element description

An entrance ground pit, which is one of the structural elements of a burial consisting of the following components:

(09) – entrance ground pit;

(24) – mud brickwork blocking a passage between (60) and (62);

(25) – burial chamber;

(30) – skeleton;

The pit is oriented along the WE line.

The pit has been preserved in traces – in the western part the contour of the bottom of the pit is visible, in the eastern part the walls up to 18 cm high are partially preserved.

The pit in the east has a narrowing in the form of a passage to the burial chamber (25), at the eastern edge on the floor of the pit there is a partition made of mud bricks (24). The width of the passage is 40 cm, the present-day height is 6 cm. Pit size: length about 125 cm, width about 65 cm (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 71-76).

 

Code ST1_22_01_10

Element 10

Altitudes

Top: 1151.689

Bottom: 1151.516

Element description

Burial chamber

Dimensions: length 150 cm, width 108 cm. Destroyed in the upper part, there is no exit to the vault, the preserved height is 17-20 cm.

The chamber is a roughly rectangular shape, with rounded corners, oriented along the NW-SE line.

In the eastern part, the burial chamber narrows significantly into an appendix, 40 cm wide and 60 cm long, cut in the soil to place a dead person taller than the length of the burial chamber. Thus, the total length of the camera was 205 cm.

The dead person (34) was laid in a stretched position on their back along the northern side of the burial chamber. The southern part of the chamber remained unoccupied. Apparently, the burial chamber was made deeper by 17-20 cm in relation to the level of the entrance ground pit. The floor of the chamber is not smooth and has with numerous notches and holes (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 77-80).

 

Code ST1_22_01_11

Element 11 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 26)

Element description

Altitudes:

Top: 1151.655

Bottom: 1151.182

An entrance ground pit, which is one of the structural elements of a burial consisting of the following components:

(11) – entrance ground pit;

(39) – mud brickwork blocking a passage between (11) and (39);

(35) – burial chamber;

(36) – skeleton.

The entrance ground pit has been preserved to a height of 47-48 cm, has a roughly rectangular shape with cut corners. The dimensions of the pit are 130x82-88 cm.

The entrance pit is oriented along the NW-SE line, passing into a burial chamber (39), while the burial chamber is located east of the entrance pit.

In the eastern wall of the entrance pit there is a passage 39 cm wide leading to a burial chamber. The passage narrows through protrusions cut in the loam mainland from the northern and southern sides of the pit. The length of the southern protrusion is 10 cm, the width is 25 cm. The length of the northern protrusion is 20 cm, width 21 cm. The floor of the pit is not even. The passage is slightly shifted to the northern side (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 81-84).

 

Code ST1_22_01_12

Element 12

Element description

Altitudes:

1150.390

The burial chamber (dimensions recorded on the surface: length 190 cm, width 70 cm) is rectangular in shape with rounded corners, oriented along the NW-SE line.

Filling – loose loam of bright brown colour; small chips of dark blue rock and whitish large carbonates are found in small quantities in the filling.

At a depth of 26 cm, the skeleton of the buried person was cleared; it was stretched out on its back, head oriented to the west (21).

In the NW corner of the burial chamber, at the head of the buried, a blockage of mud bricks (20) was cleared; apparently, it was added to mud brickwork (19) blocking a passage to the burial chamber (12).

The walls of the burial chamber are practically vertical. The ceiling has not been preserved, but, apparently, it, like the ceilings of other burial chambers, was rounded. The vertical walls of the chamber passed into a rounded ceiling-vault approximately in the middle of their height at the level of 30-40 cm from the floor of the burial chamber.

On the western side, the burial chamber is separated from the entrance pit (12) by a narrowing entrance (width 43 cm wide, preserved height 20 cm, depth 15 cm) and mud brickwork (19) blocking the entrance (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 85-87).

 

Code ST1_22_01_13

Element 13

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1150.888

Bottom 1150.609

An entrance ground pit, which is one of the structural elements of a burial consisting of the following components:

(13) – entrance ground pit;

(19) – mud brickwork blocking a passage between (13) and (20);

(20) – burial chamber;

(21) – skeleton.

The entrance ground pit has practically not been preserved, it has a roughly rectangular shape, the corners are rounded. The dimensions of the pit are 190x70 cm, the preserved depth is 20-24 cm.

The entrance pit is oriented along the NW-SE line, longitudinally passes into a burial chamber (20), while the burial chamber is located east of the entrance pit.

In the eastern wall of the entrance pit there is a passage 48-50 cm wide leading to a burial chamber. The passage through a protrusion cut from the southern side in the loamy mainland, with dimensions of 17-18x13-23 cm (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 88).

 

Code ST1_22_01_14

Element 14 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 27)

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1153.438

Bottom 1152.354

An entrance ground pit, which is one of the structural elements of a burial consisting of the following components:

(14) – entrance ground pit;

(37) – mud brickwork blocking a passage between (16) and (45);

(38) – burial chamber;

(40) – skeleton.

The entrance ground pit has been preserved to a height of 50-67 cm, has roughly rectangular shape, widening towards the east; the corners are not rounded. Dimensions: western wall 83 cm, northern wall 143 cm, eastern wall 105 cm, southern wall 133 cm (at the top). It has slanting walls narrowing to the bottom (to the floor), floor-level dimensions: western wall 62 cm, northern wall 116 cm, eastern wall 80 cm, southern wall 111 cm. The entrance pit is oriented with the long side in the direction of the NW-SE, in line with the burial chamber (38), while the burial chamber is located east of the entrance pit (14). In the eastern wall of the entrance pit there was a passage leading to a burial chamber. Passage dimensions: width 40 cm, height (complete preservation) 40 cm, depth not more than 15 cm. The height of the passage has been preserved completely, the upper part has not been destroyed.

The brickwork (37) covering the passage to the burial chamber (38) has been preserved insitu, not destroyed.

The floor of the entrance pit is uneven, has traces of holes.

The filling of the entrance pit consists of loose grey-brown loam (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 89-92).

 

Code ST1_22_01_15

Element 15 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 26)

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1152.030

Bottom 1151.553

An entrance ground pit, which is one of the structural elements of a burial consisting of the following components:

(15) – entrance ground pit;

(53) – mud brickwork blocking a passage between (13) and (20);

(51) – burial chamber;

(56) – skeleton;

(52) – ceramic lamp

Element (15) is located in the eastern part of the excavation. It was found while cleaning the surface of the excavation.

Dimensions of the pit: length 140 cm, width 100 cm, depth 50 cm, rectangular shape in plan. The orientation of the pit is WE.

The pit is connected to the burial chamber (51) by means of a passage in the eastern part of the pit. Dimensions of the passage: width 50 cm, height 50 cm. The passage is blocked with mud bricks (53). The walls of the pit are uneven, the floor is flat. The pit is filled with loose soil light brown colour (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 93-97).

 

Code ST1_22_01_16

Element 16 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 27)

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1153.438

Bottom 1152.354

An entrance ground pit, which is one of the structural elements of a burial consisting of the following components:

(16) – entrance ground pit;

(44) – mud brickwork blocking a passage between (16) and (45);

(45) – burial chamber;

(46) – skeleton.

The entrance ground pit has been preserved at a height of 100 cm (preserved and visible in the "main" southern profile of excavation 1), has a roughly rectangular shape in plan, the corners of the chamber are straight, not rounded. The northern side of the chamber has not been preserved, the dimensions can be specified as follows: length (preserved in the profile) 107 cm, width at least 100 cm (not specified more precisely due to the destruction in the northern part).

The entrance pit is oriented with the long side in the direction of the NW-SE, in line with the burial chamber (45), while the burial chamber is located east of the entrance pit (16).

In the eastern wall of the entrance pit there was a passage leading to a burial chamber. It is not possible to specify the dimensions of the passage due to the destruction of the northern part of the entrance pit and the burial chamber.

The brickwork (44) blocking the passage fell into the burial chamber (45) and partially on the skeleton lying on the left shoulder (46), which indicates the absence of ground filling of the burial chamber (45) and a skeleton (46).

The floor of the entrance pit is partially preserved, very smooth without traces of significant holes, the surface of the pit walls is similar to the floor surface.

The filling of the entrance pit consists of quite loose grey-brown loam (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 98-103).

 

Code ST1_22_01_17

Element 17 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 27)

Element description

An entrance ground pit, which is one of the structural elements of a burial consisting of the following components:

(17) – entrance ground pit;

(27) – mud brickwork blocking a passage between (60) and (62);

(41) – burial chamber;

(26) – skeleton;

Element (60) is located in the central part of the excavation.

The northern part of the burial chamber, the entrance pit and the partitions are lost. The contours of the bottom and the southern wall are what remains of the ground entrance pit. Dimensions of the pit: length 110 cm, width 90 cm, preserved height in the southern part 70 cm, in the northern part about 10 cm. The floor of the pit smoothly passes into walls, the surface of the floor and walls is smooth. In the eastern part of the pit there is a passage blocked with bricks (27) leading to the burial chamber (41). The width of the passage is 40 cm, height 40 cm, depth 40 cm.

The floor level of the entrance pit is 13 cm higher than the floor level of the burial chamber (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 104-108).

 

Code ST1_22_01_18

Element 18

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1150.879

Bottom 1150.235

An entrance ground pit, which is one of the structural elements of a burial consisting of the following components:

(18) – entrance ground pit;

(15) – mud brickwork blocking a passage between (13) and (20);

(54) – burial chamber;

(55) – skeleton;

(57) – mud brick blockage

The entrance ground pit was destroyed by a root system, it was not possible to establish clear boundaries and dimensions.

Approximate dimensions: length 95 cm, width 125 cm, preserved height 30 cm. A passage blocked with mud bricks leads from the entrance pit to the burial chamber (54). Dimensions of the passage: width 50 cm, preserved height 48 cm.

The filling of the pit is loose, the walls have not been preserved, the floor is heavily cut by roots (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 109-112).

 

Code ST1_22_01_19

Element 19

Altitudes

Top 1150.794

Bottom 1150.605

Element description

A mud brickwork blocking the entrance from the entrance pit (13) to the burial chamber (12).

The width of the brickwork is 36 cm, the depth is 47 cm, the height (preserved) is 17 cm.

The dimensions of the mud brick are 31x31x13 cm, the brick is grey in colour, very similar to the inter-brick mortar traced on the surface of the upper row of bricks, about 0.5-1 cm thick.

2 rows of bricks are laid without bond. The upper row (two bricks) is slightly shifted towards the burial chamber (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 25).

 

Code ST1_22_01_20

Element 20

Element description

Mud brick blockage.

Cleared in the southern part of the burial chamber, to the north of the skull of the buried person. The blockage consists, apparently, of two rows of mud bricks.

Brick size: 31х31х14 cm. The brick is formed of brownish-yellowish uniform loam. The blockage line is stretched along the WE line.

The blockage is connected with the mud brickwork (19), which blocked the entrance between the burial chamber and the entrance pit.

The size of the brick in the brickwork (19) is 31x31x14 cm, identical to element 20 (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 86).

 

Code ST1_22_01_23

Element 23

Altitudes

1151.278

Element description

Skeleton

Only the lower limbs of the skeleton of the buried person were recorded. The skeleton was laid in the burial chamber (7) on its back, stretched along the NW-SE line.

The bones are large, which may indirectly indicate the mature age and strong physique of the buried person (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 64).

 

Code ST1_22_01_24

Element 24

Altitudes

1150.783

Element description

Mud brickwork blocking the entrance from the entrance pit (9) to the burial chamber (28).

Brickwork width 23 cm, length 40 cm, height 10 cm. The dimensions of the mud brick are 40x22x8–9 cm.

The brickwork is made of two bricks lying one on top of another. The brick clay is a brown-grey loamy mass. The inter-brick mortar was not recorded.

 

Code ST1_22_01_25

Element 25

Element description

Altitudes

Top 1150.793

Bottom 1150.130

Burial chamber

Dimensions:

length

length 175 cm

width (in the central part) 107 cm

width (NW part) 115 cm

width (SW part) 74 cm

height (in the central part) 80 cm

height (in the NW part) 68 cm

height (in the SW part) 50 cm

In plan the burial chamber has an oval shape, the corners are rounded, oriented NW-SE.

The ceiling of the chamber has a spherical shape, the walls of the chamber very smoothly pass into the ceiling, which generally gives the chamber a spherical shape. The smooth transition into the sphere begins at about 28 cm from the floor level. The floor of the burial chamber is levelled.

In the area of the legs (actually at the level of the knee joints), the burial chamber narrows significantly to a width of 63 cm and a height of 35-40 cm. On the surface of the floor, walls and ceiling of the burial chamber, traces of the tool used to dig out the chamber in the thick brown-grey loam are clearly visible. The hand trench tool that left traces, apparently, had a flat blade 8 cm wide. The surface of the blade had numerous notches (about 6 notches along the entire width of the blade).

The material from which the trench tool was made is not known, perhaps it was wood. The metal blade is easily smoothed by hammering and does not leave a large number of marks from notches.

The tool was used vertically, the soil was removed by movements directed from top to bottom, leaving traces of 9 cm high on the loam surface.

The surface of the spherical ceiling was made with the same tool, but using not the hitting method, but the method of cutting the soil with longitudinal movements from the far (SE) side of the chamber towards the top and the NW.

The filling of the burial chamber is very loose bright brown loam, which filled the burial chamber almost completely up to its vault. Apparently, the filling is artificial, homogeneous in density, colour, and composition.

In the centre of the north-western wall of the chamber, a passage has been cut down connecting the burial chamber and the entrance pit (9).

The width of the passage is 43 cm, the height has not been preserved, the depth is 25 cm, while the width of the entrance pit is 63 cm. The passage is 20 cm narrower. The passage is blocked with mud brickwork (24).

The floor of the burial chamber (depth 1150.130) is deepened by 54 cm in relation to the floor of the entrance pit (09) (depth 1150.679).

Thus, the burial chamber (25), in addition to the entrance, is separated from the entrance pit (09) by a ledge (step) 54 cm high (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 71-75).

 

Code ST1_22_01_27

Element 27

Element description

Mud brickwork (partition)

Element (27) separates the entrance pit (17) and the burial chamber (41).

The brickwork is made on the floor of the entrance pit (17). It is made of mud bricks 23x23x6 cm in size. The bricks form 2 lines, 2 bricks in 3 rows in each line. One brick lies nearby on the floor of the entrance pit.

Between the bricks there is an inter-brick mortar about 3 cm thick. The bricks are made of soil identical to the soil where the graves are located.

The brickwork in width completely blocks the passage, in height it does not reach the upper edge of the passage by about 10 cm. The top row of bricks is destroyed (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 105-106).

 

Code ST1_22_01_28

Element 28

Altitudes

Top 1151.541

Bottom 1151.338

Element description

Mud brickwork blocking the entrance from the entrance pit (8) to the burial chamber (29).

The width of the brickwork is 33 cm, the depth is 45 cm, the height (preserved) is 23-24 cm.

The dimensions of the mud brick are 31x21x7-8 cm (badly damaged). The brick is grey in colour, poorly preserved. The presence of inter-brick mortar is difficult to determine. The upper part of the brickwork is destroyed. Apparently, one row of the brickwork has been preserved. Two rows of brickwork are recorded horizontally (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 67-70).

 

Code ST1_22_01_29

Element 29 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 26)

Element description

Altitudes

Top 1151.595

Bottom 1151.015

Burial chamber

Dimensions:

length

length 115 cm

width (in the central part) 86 cm

width (NW part) 64 cm

width (SW part) 45 cm

height (in the central part) 55 cm

height (in the NW part) 37 cm

height (in the SW part) 38 cm

In plan the burial chamber has an oval shape, the corners are absent, oriented NW-SE.

The ceiling of the chamber has a spherical shape, the walls of the chamber very smoothly pass into the ceiling, which generally gives the chamber a spherical shape. The smooth transition into the sphere begins at about 30-31 cm from the floor level. The floor of the burial chamber is levelled.

An interesting feature was revealed during the cleaning – the height of the buried person significantly exceeds the length of the pre-prepared burial chamber. To accommodate the buried person in the burial chamber of a shorter length than required, the legs of the buried person were bent at the knees, and additionally a recess 26 cm high, 29 cm wide, 38 cm deep was cut in the eastern wall of the burial chamber.

The surface of the walls and the vault of the burial chamber are made very roughly. Traces of numerous chips, irregularities are visible on the entire surface, as well as traces of a trench tool with a blade 2 cm wide.

The soil was removed in layers, chopped with multidirectional movements; after making the main volume of the chamber, the surface of its walls and ceiling was not additionally levelled.

The floor surface of the chamber was not additionally levelled.

The filling of the burial chamber consists of very loose bright brown loam.

The loose loam actually fills the burial chamber up to the upper level, which indicates its artificial nature. The filling is homogeneous in density, colour and composition.

In the centre of the north-western wall of the chamber, a passage has been cut to connect the burial chamber (29) and the entrance pit (8). The width of the passage is 53 cm, the preserved height (partially destroyed) is 23 cm, the depth is 36-37 cm. At the same time, the width of the entrance pit is 72 cm, that is, the passage is 35 cm narrower. The passage is blocked with mud brickwork (28).

The floor of the burial chamber (depth 1151.015) is deepened by 20-42 cm in relation to the floor of the entrance ground pit (8) (depth 1151.439).

Thus, the burial chamber (29) is separated from the entrance pit (8) by a 36-42 cm high ledge. The skeleton (33) is placed in the southern half of the chamber, the northern half is not occupied by anything (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 67-70).

 

Code ST1_22_01_30

Element 30

Altitudes

1150.970

Element description

Skeleton

The skeleton was laid on the floor of the burial chamber (10) on its back, stretched along the NW-SE line.

The head of the buried person was raised by making a 2-3 cm thick soil cushion, so the face of the buried person was directed towards the east (sunrise).

The position of the arms: the right and left arms are stretched along the trunk, bent at right angles at the elbow joints, the hands lie at waist level.

Leg position: stretched.

The skeleton is located at the northern side of the burial chamber, while its southern side is not occupied by anything (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 71-75).

 

Code ST1_22_01_32

Element 32

Altitudes

1150.945

Element description

Pit

The pit has a rounded shape, made of grey-brown loam, visually different from the surface of the excavation in a darker colour.

 

Code ST1_22_01_33

Element 33

Element description

Altitudes:

1151.044

Skeleton

The skeleton was laid on the floor of the burial chamber (29) on its back, stretched along the NW-SE line.

The head of the buried person was raised by making a 2-3 cm thick soil cushion, so the face of the buried person was directed towards the east (sunrise).

Arms: the right arm is bent at the elbow joint, the hand lie at waist level, the left arm is stretched along the trunk.

The legs are bent at the knees and turned to the left. The reason for this position of the legs is the discrepancy between the length of the burial chamber and the height of the buried person.

The skeleton is located at the southern wall of the burial chamber, while the northern half of the burial chamber is free (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 67-70).

 

Code ST1_22_01_35

Element 35

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1151.421

Bottom 1151.162

Mud brickwork blocking the entrance from the entrance pit (11) to the burial chamber (39).

The width of the brickwork is 44 cm, the height (preserved) is 26 cm. The dimensions of the mud brick are 24x28x8 cm.

The brick is grey-brown in colour. In total, three rows of bricks are recorded, laid without bond one on top of another (a total of six bricks). It is possible the two upper bricks were partially shifted and a kind of bond was formed. A half of a brick fell on the floor of the burial chamber, which indicates the burial chamber was not filled with soil at the time of the fall of the brick from the mud brickwork (35) onto the floor of the burial chamber.

Between the rows of the brickwork there is a layer of sandy loam richer grey-brown in colour, very loose, which is inter-brick mortar; the layer is up to 3 cm thick. One of the bricks in the brickwork has traces of ash, which possibly indicates the bricks were produced not at the burial site, but in places of active habitation and, accordingly, the use of fire (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 82-83).

 

Code ST1_22_01_36

Element 36

Element description

Altitudes:

1150.970

Skeleton

The skeleton was laid on the floor of the burial chamber (39) on its back, stretched along the NW-SE line.

The head of the buried person was raised by making a 2-3 cm thick soil cushion, so the face of the buried person was directed towards the east (sunrise).

Arms: the right arm is bent at the elbow joint so that the hand rests below the chest, in the area of the iliac fossa. The left arm is also bent at the elbow joint, the hand lies at waist level.

The legs are slightly bent at the knees and, in this regard, have dropped to the right (southern) side.

The buried person is laid along the southern side of the burial chamber. The northern part of the chamber is free (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 82-83).

 

Code ST1_22_01_37

Element 37

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1151.977

Bottom 1151.584

Mud brickwork blocking the entrance from the entrance pit (14) to the burial chamber (38).

The width of the brickwork is 44-43 cm, the height (fully preserved) is 40 cm, the depth is 43 cm. The dimensions of the mud brick are 43х21х8 cm.

The brick is grey, made of very thick clay. The recorded part of the brickwork is four rows in height, two in width. The brick was laid without bond. A total of eight bricks are recorded.

The inter-brick mortar is practically not traced between the rows of bricks.

The brickwork is made in such a way that in the upward direction every next row is shifted by 1-1.5 cm towards the burial chamber, creating a kind of small ledges (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 90-91).

 

Code ST1_22_01_38

Element 38

Element description

Burial chamber

Dimensions:

length 187 cm

width (in the central part) 77 cm

width (SE part) 90 cm

height (in the central part) 70 cm

height (in the NW part) 60-63 cm

height (in the SE part) 20 cm

In plan the burial chamber has a trapezoidal shape with rounded corners. The NW side is wide – 90 cm, the SE is narrow – 30 cm.

The walls of the chamber vertically rise to the level of 56 cm, after which they very abruptly pass into an arched vault. The floor of the chamber is levelled. The surface of the vault and the walls of the chamber are cut very roughly. The dimensions and shape of the trench tool blade: width 3-4 cm, traces of a tool resembling a pick axe are visible.

The burial chamber is filled to the top with loose loam the brown hue, which indicates the filling was purposeful. A passage connecting the burial chamber (38) and the entrance pit (14) was cut into the NW wall of the burial chamber. The width of the passage is 40-44 cm, height 40 cm, depth 15 cm.

The passage is blocked with mud bricks (37). The passage is located on the central axis of the entrance pit, but it is shifted from the central axis of the burial chamber. The southern side of the burial chamber (south of the passage) is 25-26 cm, the northern side (north of the passage) is 13 cm.

The buried person was laid along the southern side of the burial chamber, the passage was thus to the left (north) of the buried person. The width of the entrance pit is 105 cm, the width of the burial chamber is 85-87 cm, the width of the passage is 40-44 cm. The floor of the chamber is deepened in relation to the floor of the entrance pit – the height of the ledge / step is 17 cm (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 91-92).

 

Code ST1_22_01_39

Element 39

Element description

Altitudes

Top 1151.646

Bottom 1150.970

Burial chamber

Dimensions:

length

length 175 cm

width (in the central part) 95 cm

width (NW part) 101 cm

width (SW part) 64 cm

height (in the central part) 52 cm

height (in the NW part) 59 cm

height (in the SW part) 39 cm

In plan the burial chamber has an oval shape with rounded corners, oriented NW-SE.

The walls of the chamber vertically rise to the level of 30-36 cm, after which they smoothly pass into an arched vault. The floor of the chamber is levelled.

The burial chamber narrows smoothly in the eastern part and has a rounded extention for the legs of the deceased. The width of the extension is 49 cm, height 30 cm, depth 45 cm. the buried person (36) is placed on the back in an stretched position. The legs are slightly bent at the knees, the bones are shifted to the right (to the south).

The surface of the walls and the vault of the burial chamber are cut very roughly with numerous traces of holes, without subsequent smoothing. The size of the blade of the trench tool is 1-2 cm.

The filling of the burial chamber consists of very loose bright brown loam. The loose loam actually fills the burial chamber up to the upper level, which indicates its artificial nature. In the north-western wall of the chamber, a passage has been cut to connect the burial chamber (39) and the entrance pit (11). The width of the passage is 39 cm, the present-day height is 32 cm. The burial chamber widens to the south by 40 cm in relation to the passage of the entrance pit (11). The buried person was laid along the southern side of the burial chamber, the passage was thus to the left (north) of the buried person (36).

In the northern direction of the burial chamber, in relation to the passage, it widens only by 6-8 cm. so the width of the entrance pit (11) is 82-88 cm, the width of the burial chamber is 100 cm, and the width of the passage is 39 cm. The passage is blocked with mud brickwork (35).

The floor of the burial chamber (level 1150.970) is deepened by 15-20 cm in relation to the floor of the entrance ground pit (11) (level 1151.182). The burial chamber (39) is separated from the entrance ground pit (11) by a ledge (step) 15-20 cm high (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 82-83).

 

Code ST1_22_01_41

Element 41

Element description

The burial chamber (41) is oriented along the WE line.

The element is a continuation of the entrance pit (17) at SE. The northern part of the chamber is partially destroyed.

Dimensions:

length

length in the southern part 200 cm, in the northern part 100 cm

width (western part) 120 cm

width (centre) 90 cm

width (eastern part) 30 cm

height (western part) 55 cm

height (centre) 57 cm

height (eastern part) 30 cm

The walls of the burial chamber round smoothly to the ceiling, at a height of 30 cm from the floor there is a sharp rounding to the ceiling. The floor and walls of the chamber are quite smooth, the ceiling is rougher and uneven (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 105-106).

 

Code ST1_22_01_43

Element 43

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1151.972

Bottom 1151.460

Mud brickwork

Element (43) separates the entrance pit (15) and the burial chamber (51). A brickwork blocks the entire passage with dimensions of 50x50 cm. In the brickwork there are 5 rows of very eroded bricks, about 30 cm long; the height of the bricks is about 7-8 cm, the width is about 20 cm. A 2-3 cm thick inter-brick mortar is visible between the bricks (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 94-96).

 

Code ST1_22_01_44_1

Element 44_1

Element description

Altitudes

Top 1152.103

Bottom 1151.911

Mud bricks that fell out of the brickwork in the eastern direction into the burial chamber (45). Three bricks fell on the left shoulder of a skeleton (46) buried in the burial chamber (45).

The inter-brick mortar is not visible. The material is dense loam of light grey colour.

There are two types of bricks:

Type 1 – 22x18x7 cm

Type 2 – 22x22x9 cm

One Type 2 brick is located at the bottom, two Type 1 bricks are located on top of the Type 2 brick. They stretch along the NS line.

Code ST1_22_01_44_2

Element 44_2

Element description

Mud brickwork

Blocking/closing the passage from the entrance pit (16) to the burial chamber (45).

The brickwork has collapsed into the interior of the burial chamber and is partially lying on the floor of the burial chamber, partially on the upper left part (shoulder girdle) of the skeleton of the buried person (46).

By the location of the fallen bricks, it is possible that it is shifted somewhat northwards in relation to the central axis of the burial chamber.

The dimensions of the brick are 26x26x7-7.5 cm. The brick is grey-brown in colour, the clay is very dense, but it cracks quite easily.

 

Element 45

Element description

Altitudes

Top 1152.665

Bottom 1151.916

Burial chamber

Dimensions:

length

length 193 cm

width (in the central part) 103 cm

width (NW part) 123 cm

width (SW part) 72 cm

height (in the central part) 69 cm

height (in the NW part) 74 cm

height (in the SW part) 52 cm

In plan the burial chamber has an oval shape with rounded corners, oriented NW-SE.

The ceiling of the chamber has a spherical shape, the walls of the chamber rise vertically to the level of 41 cm, after which they smoothly pass into a spherical vault. The entire northern side of the vault of the burial chamber has a spherical shape. The entire southern side opposite is not turned completely into a sphere. The southern wall of the chamber rises vertically up to the level of 54 cm, making up a virtually straight angle with a levelled ceiling, which only after 63-70 cm in the north direction passes into a spherical shape.

Deep inside, in the eastern direction, the ceiling of the chamber at a distance of 128 cm from the entrance to the chamber (from the ledge / step) separating the chamber from the entrance pit has a ledge 6-7 cm high, after which the burial chamber stretches and narrows, which is made to accommodate the buried person, whose height is larger than the length of the burial chamber. Dimensions: length 44 cm, width 57 cm, height 41 cm.

The buried person (46) is laid on his back in a stretched position along the southern wall of the burial chamber. The northern side of the chamber is free. Perhaps the passage connecting the entrance pit (16) and the burial chamber (45) was slightly shifted in the north direction. The surface of the walls of the vault of the burial chamber is cut in the continental loam very roughly, without subsequent smoothing. The size and shape of the blade of the tool is difficult to determine, the tool had a flat blade 3 cm wide, possibly an adze.

The filling of the burial chamber consists of very loose bright brown loam. This loam actually fills the chamber up to the vault, which indicates its artificial nature. Obviously, the burial chamber was wider than the entrance pit, but it is not possible to determine how much due to the fact that the entrance pit was partially destroyed.

The passage between the burial chamber (45) and the entrance pit (16) was blocked with mud brickwork (44), which probably collapsed while the burial structure was being filled in towards the burial chamber and is lying partly on the floor and partly on the left side of the skeleton. The burial chamber is separated from the entrance pit by a ledge/step 30-32 cm high (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 101-102).

 

Code ST1_22_01_46

Element 46

Element description

Altitudes

1151.916

Skeleton

The skeleton was laid on the floor of the burial chamber (45) on its back, stretched along the NW-SE line.

The head of the buried is raised on the natural elevation of the floor of the burial chamber, possibly there was a ground cushion (height is not determined). Thus, the face of the buried person was directed to the eastern side.

Arms: the right arm is bent at the elbow joint in such a position that the hand is slightly below the waist. The left arm is also bent at the elbow joint at a right angle, the hand lies at waist level.

The legs are stretched straight, the knee joints are straightened.

The skeleton is located along the southern (right) side of the burial chamber, while the northern part of it is free (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 101-102).

 

Code ST1_22_01_47

Element 47

Element description

Altitudes

Top 1150.582

Bottom 1149.780

Burial chamber

Dimensions:

length

length 210 cm

width (in the central part) 81 cm

width (NW part) 103 cm

width (SW part) 66 cm

height (in the central part) 65 cm

height (in the NW part) 65 cm

height (in the SW part) 53 cm

In plan the burial chamber has a trapezoidal shape with rounded corners. The NW side is wide, the SE one is narrow.

The walls of the chamber vertically rise to the level of 53-58 cm, after which they smoothly pass into an arched vault. The floor of the chamber is levelled. The surface of the vault and the walls of the chamber are cut very roughly.

The burial chamber is filled to the top with loose loam the brown hue, which indicates the filling was purposeful. A passage connecting the burial chamber (47) and the entrance pit (49) was cut into the NW wall of the burial chamber. Passage width is 56-57 cm, height 58 cm.

The passage is blocked with mud bricks (50). The passage is slightly shifted to the northern side. The passage is located on the central axis of the entrance pit, but it is shifted to the central axis of the burial chamber. The southern side of the burial chamber (south of the passage) is 32-37 cm, the northern side (north of the passage) is 15-21 cm.

The buried person was laid along the southern side of the burial chamber, the passage was thus to the left (north) of the buried person. The width of the entrance pit (49) is 92 cm, the width of the burial chamber is 101 cm, the width of the passage is 56-57 cm. The floor of the chamber (level 1149.780) is deepened in relation to the floor of the entrance pit (level 1150.077) by 29-30 cm – the height of the ledge / step is 25-27 cm (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 113-116).

 

Code ST1_22_01_48

Element 48

Element description

Altitudes:

1149.780

Skeleton

The skeleton was laid on the floor of the burial chamber (47) on its back, stretched along the NW-SE line.

The head of the buried person was raised by making a 2-3 cm thick soil cushion, so the face of the buried person was directed towards the east (sunrise).

Arms: the right arm is bent at the elbow joint in such a way that the bones of the forearm are pressed against the bones of the shoulder, while the hand is in the area of the deltoids of the shoulder joint. The left arm is bent at the elbow joint by 75 °, the hand lies below the chest, in the region of the iliac fossa.

The legs are stretched out in a natural position.

The buried person is laid along the southern side of the burial chamber. The passage between the chamber and the entrance pit is shifted to the north, the northern part of the chamber is free (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 113-116).

 

Code ST1_22_01_49

Element 49 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 28)

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1150.701

Bottom 1150.091

An entrance ground pit, which is one of the structural elements of a burial consisting of the following components:

(49) – entrance ground pit;

(47) – mud brickwork blocking a passage between (49) and (47);

(50) – burial chamber;

(48) – skeleton.

The entrance ground pit has been preserved to a height of 65-68 cm, has a roughly rectangular shape, the corners are not practically rounded. The dimensions of the pit are 128-138x98 cm.

The entrance pit is oriented along the NW-SE line, longitudinally passes into a burial chamber (47), while the burial chamber is located east of the entrance pit.

In the eastern wall of the entrance pit there is a passage 45 cm wide leading to a burial chamber. The passage narrows with the help of two protrusions (northern and southern) cut in the loamy mass of the mainland. The length of the southern protrusion is 13 cm, the width is 24 cm. The length of the northern protrusion is 15 cm, width 18 cm. The floor of the pit is not even. The passage is located on the central axis of the pit, but not on the central axis of the burial chamber – the chamber extends southwards (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 113-116).

 

Code ST1_22_01_50

Element 50

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1150.396

Bottom 1150.064

Mud brickwork

Blocking/closing the passage from the entrance pit (49) to the burial chamber (47).

The width of the brickwork is 45 cm (in the lower part), in the upper part it reaches 70 cm. That is, the passage roughly trapezoidal in shape narrows towards the bottom. The preserved height of the brickwork is 33-40 cm. The dimensions of the mud brick are 21х23x8–9 cm. The brick is grey, very dense, differing in density from bricks from other burials. In total, there are four rows of bricks recorded. The brick is laid in bonds, the width of the brickwork is one brick. Five brick halves 21x9-10x8 cm fell into the burial chamber, and lie on a layer of loose brownish soil 2-3 cm thick.

This is another evidence of the absence of the filling of the burial chamber with soil at the time of blocking the passage with mud bricks. Between the rows of bricks there is a layer of lumpy loose sandy loam of grey colour, which is inter-brick mortar, 1-4 cm thick (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 113-116).

 

Code ST1_22_01_51

Element 51

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1151.927

Bottom: 1151.182

The burial chamber (51) is located east of the entrance pit (15), the eastern half of the chamber goes beyond the edge of the excavation, the western half is open from above. In plan the chamber is a rectangle with an additional extension in the SE part (for the legs).

Chamber dimensions: length without extension 150 cm, length with extension 205 cm, width in the western part 110 cm, in the central part 100 cm, extension 48 cm, height of the western part 60 cm, central part 60 cm, eastern part 43 cm.

The burial chamber is located 25 cm below the level of the entrance pit. The floor of the burial chamber is flat, the walls and ceiling are uneven (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 94-96).

 

Code ST1_22_01_52

Element 52

Element description

A ceramic lamp (chirag) was found in the northwestern part of the burial chamber (51). The object has a rounded shape with a diameter of 10 cm, the bottom is spherical, there is a spout on the edge, partially destroyed. It is made by the technique of hand modeling (see Appendix “Artifacts”, fig. 31-33).

 

Code ST1_22_01_53

Element 53

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1151.972

Bottom 1151.460

Mud brickwork (partition)

Element (53) separates the entrance pit (18) and the burial chamber (54).

The brickwork is made on the floor of the entrance pit (18). The brickwork consists of two lines of bricks laid in three rows, the lines also consist of two bricks. Brickwork dimensions: height 34 cm, width 50 cm, length 50 cm. The dimensions of the brick are 20x25x10 cm.

The brick is light grey with an admixture of small stones and pieces of limestone, very dense. The material of the brick is similar to the soil in which the graves are arranged.

Inter-brick mortar about 3 cm thick is visible between the bricks (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 110-111).

 

Code ST1_22_01_54

Element 54

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1150.875

Bottom 1150.291

The burial chamber is oriented along the WE line.

The element is located in the southern part of the excavation, when clearing the surface, a rounded spot with loose filling and a large number of roots was found. During the excavation, it turned out that the roots destroyed the southern part of the burial chamber (54), which thus did not make it possible to identify its southern wall. In the northern part, a small fragment of the ceiling was excavated.

Dimensions of the chamber: length 210 cm, width in the eastern part 40 cm, in the central part 65 cm, in the western part 40 cm, preserved ceiling height in the central part 35 cm.

The shape of the chamber in plan was presumably a rough rectangle with an extension in the SE part. The filling of the chamber is dense loam interspersed with mud bricks of an amorphous shape (57) lying on the chest of the skeleton (55).

The walls and floor of the burial chamber are strongly cut by roots, the western edge of the chamber is vertical, the eastern rounded (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 110-111).

 

Code ST1_22_01_58

Element 58 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 28)

Element description

Altitudes

Top 1150.112

Bottom 1149.553

Burial chamber (58)

The element is located in the NE part of the excavation near the steep edge. Part of the burial chamber – the floor, part of the ceiling, the western and eastern walls – is what has remained of this burial. The partition and the entrance pit are destroyed.

Dimensions:

length

length 190 cm

width (western part) 55 cm

width (centre) 60 cm

width (eastern part) 45 cm

height (western part) 50 cm

height (centre) 50 cm

height (eastern part) 35 cm

The shape of the pit is rectangular with rounded western and eastern edges.

The western wall is vertical, the eastern one is rounded, the chamber narrows in height from west to east. The walls and floor of the chamber are smooth (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 117-119).

 

Code ST1_22_01_60

Element 60

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1153.206

Bottom 1152.175

An entrance ground pit, which is one of the structural elements of a burial consisting of the following components:

(60) – entrance ground pit;

(61) – mud brickwork blocking a passage between (60) and (62);

(62) – burial chamber;

(63) – skeleton;

Element (60) is located in the southern profile of the excavation, the northern half is lost.

Pit parameters: height 110 cm (on top of the ground pit there is a turf layer 30 cm thick), length 150 cm, preserved depth 40 cm. According to the preserved part of the pit, its shape in plan was probably roughly rectangular. The orientation of the pit as well as the entire burial is WE.

Element (60) is connected to element (62) by means of a passage blocked with brickwork (61). This passage is also destroyed in the northern part. Dimensions of the passage: height 30 cm – the level of the lower part of the passage is 10 cm higher than the level of the entrance pit (60), the preserved width of the passage is 50 cm, depth 25 cm.

The pit is filled with loose loamy soil light brown colour. The walls of the pit have an uneven surface, the floor is more even, in the western part the floor smoothly passes into the western wall – the corner is rounded (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 120-127).

 

Code ST1_22_01_61

Element 61

Element description

Altitudes:

Top 1152.490

Bottom 1152.113

Mud brickwork (partition)

Element (61) separates the entrance pit (60) and the burial chamber (62).

The brickwork is made on the floor of the entrance pit (60). The northern part of the partition is lost. The preserved width of the masonry is 30 cm at the base, 17 cm at the top, the depth of the brickwork in 1 brick is 40 cm at the base, 25 cm at the top.

At the base of the masonry are 2 large grey bricks with dimensions of 40x22x10 cm, on the top there are three rows of dark grey bricks with a length of 25 cm, a height of 9 cm. There is a small layer of inter-brick mortar 2 cm thick between the bricks.

The brickwork does not block the entire passage – in the southern part there is an open section of the passage 35 cm wide, 30 cm high (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 120-127).

 

Code ST1_22_01_62

Element 62 (see Appendix “Drawings”, fig. 26)

Element description

Altitudes

Top 1152.573

Bottom 1151.914

Burial chamber

Dimensions:

length

length 210 cm

width (head) 43 cm

width (centre) 55 cm

width (feet) 53 cm

height (head) 70 cm

height (centre) 64 cm

height (feet) 40 cm

In plan the pit is a rectangle with a rounded eastern edge.

The western wall of the chamber is almost vertical, the ceiling lowers to the east and rounds in the extreme western part. The northern part of the chamber is partially lost. In the southern part, in the chamber wall there is a recess 40 cm long, 12 cm deep, 20 cm high. Most likely, this is the result of digging the burial chamber. The walls of the chamber from the floor to the level of 30 cm are smooth, higher, where they pass to the ceiling, they are looser. The floor of the chamber is flat (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 120-127).

 

Code ST1_22_01_63

Element 63

Element description

Altitudes:

1151.914

Skeleton

Placed in the burial chamber (62).

It is oriented with its feet to the east, with its head to the west. It lies on the back, legs stretched out, arms crossed on the trunk at 90°, head turned to the left.

The skeleton lies close to the southern edge of the chamber, from the west there is a distance of 14 cm between the skull and the wall of the chamber, in the eastern part between the phalanges of the feet and the edge of the chamber about 10 cm.

The phalanges of the hands and feet are scattered chaotically around the grave chamber. The lower jaw lies on the left collarbone. The main bones of the skeleton are arranged in an anatomical order.

The length of the skeleton from the top of the skull to the shin is 173 cm, the width at the shoulders is 44 cm, the width of the pelvis is 37 cm (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 121-126).

 

Code ST1_22_01_64

Element 64

Element description

Altitudes:

1149.614

Burial chamber (64)

Located in the northern part of the excavation, at the steep edge. Fragments of human bones were recorded in the section of the edge.

When the upper layer was removed to the level of bones in the profile of the edge, remains of a burial chamber – its SE part – were revealed. The length of the preserved part is 120 cm, width 60 cm.


 

Field Forensics

 

The 2022 excavations at the cemetery at Suleman Tepa (Exc. ST_1) near the medieval monastery at Urgut, Uzbekistan revealed 17 graves, 13 of which were complete skeletons. The following osteological data are summaries of those grave excavations with a focus upon burial practice, osteological condition, preliminary investigation of sex and age range, and any obviously observable pathology. The excavations were conducted by trained archaeologists with experience in grave excavation, but not by forensic anthropologists or osteologists. For that reason, the results taken in the field during the excavation process should not be considered the definitive results that later laboratory analysis can correct or clarify.

Care was taken to expose the graves utilizing small hand tools and brushes. The remains were kept in place for recordation purposes that included burial chamber measurements, photography, 3D-photogrammatry and, in some cases, scanning with a hand-held LIDAR (Light, Imaging, Detection and Ranging) sensor on an Apple iPhone 13. Once this process was completed, the remains were then carefully exhumed, cleared of excess soil, the appendicular bones and pelvis was measured, the remains were packed in aluminum foil, bagged, and boxed, and labeled. Additional examination and photographs were taken of the skull and mandible of each skeleton in which the skull was intact to assist with examination of the sex and non-metric traits as well as dentition to assist with age estimation.

Sex and age estimation was based on Tim D. White and Pieter A. Folkens 2005, The Human Bone Manual. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press and J. E. Buikstra, J.E. and D. H. Ubelaker, (eds) 1994, Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains, Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series No. 44, Fayetteville. No attempt was made in the field to provide scale numbers regarding either cranial or pelvic data for sex identification, but instead only a basic observation within the various ranges. Age categories were based on the broad categories of Fetus (before birth); Infant (0-3 yrs); Child (3-12 yrs); Adolescent (12-20 yrs); Young Adult (20-35 yrs); Middle Adult (35-50 yrs); Old Adult (50+ yrs). In this case, no sub-adult skeletons and only one possible adolescent was discovered in the cemetery. A concluding general summary of the findings is provided at the conclusion of this section.


 

E-02 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements: not taken

             

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body:

west-to-east.

Position of hands: N/A

            Head position: N/A

 

Grave Goods: None

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 1 (less than 30%)

           

 

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes (in observable bones)

            Deciduous teeth: N/A

            Signs of osteoarthritis: N/A 

 

Age Estimation: Adult (?)

 

Cranial sex determination observations: no skull or pelvis present

 

Possible Sex: Unknown

 

Additional comments/observations: This grave (E-64) was discovered in the far northern side of excavation unit ST-1. The grave was disturbed due to construction work that occurred prior to excavations and was seen in the north profile of the hillside. Only the eastern end of the grave encompassing part of the lower appendicular skeleton was preserved. These partial remains included the right and left tibia’s, right femur, Right and left fibula’s, distal toe phalanges, 2 taluses, 2 calcanei, 1 femoral head, and a proximal ulna fragment. With no skull or pelvis present, sex and age determination were impossible. Based on size of bone and fused epiphyses of the legs, assumption is that the remains belonged to an adult (>18 yrs).

 

 

Excavation year: 2022

 


 

E-21 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-48 L-48 cm  

            Humerus: R-32.3 L-29 cm       

Radius: R-26.5 (damaged) L- 21 (damaged) cm

Ulna: R-26 (damaged) L-23.5 (damaged) cm   

Tibia: R-38.5 L-39 cm               

Fibula: R- 30 (damaged) L-34.5 cm                      

Pelvis (width): 35 cm            

Entire length: 172 cm

 

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east

Position of hands: left arm folded back on itself with radius and ulna parallel to humerus (on top), right arm crossed over midsection at 90-degree angle.

            Head position: raised

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (over 60%)

           

 

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: no

            Deciduous teeth: yes (one-behind lower left I 5-6)

            Signs of osteoarthritis: no

 

Age Estimation: Adolescent, (12-20 yrs)

 

Cranial sex determination observations: Due to age of skeleton at time of death, no field sex determination was made.

 

Possible Sex: Adolescent skeleton could have been either male or female. However, if female it would be the only one discovered in this unit.

 

Additional comments/observations: Body had a slight build; maxilla had a deciduous tooth behind lower left 5-6 incisor. The proximal heads of both tibia’s did not appear to have been fully fused, sacrum also possibly not fused. Damage to many long bones due to taphonomy, although some of could be attributed to bones not being fully fused. Many of the right ribs appeared to be in better condition than the left. Lack of M3 molars suggest sub-adult adolescent, (pre-18 yrs). Dentition showed little attrition, though lower right M1 molar may have been missing pre-mortem. Teeth samples taken of lower right premolars (P1/P2) for possible future aDNA analysis.

 

Excavation year: 2022


E-22 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-44.5 L- 40 (damaged) cm     

            Humerus: R-32.5 L- 21.5 (damaged) cm       

            Radius: R-21.5 (damaged) L-N/A cm

            Ulna: Both damaged, only heads present              

Tibia: R-37 L-13.5 (damaged) cm        


         

Fibula: R-40 L- 27 (damaged) cm              

Pelvis (width): 31 cm           

Entire length: 150 cm (skull missing)

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east

Position of hands: prone along sides and under the pelvis

            Head position: N/A

 

Grave Goods: none.

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 2 (30%-60%)

           

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: N/A

            Signs of osteoarthritis: no 

 

Age Estimation: Adult (at least over 28 years)

 

Cranial sex determination observations: Skull missing

Possible Sex: Male (?)

Very little diagnostic information to make estimation, however, what remains of the pelvis suggests possible male since ischiopubic ramus is blunt and the pelvic girdle is narrow.

Additional comments/observations: These skeletal remains were disturbed by initial mechanical excavations during topsoil removal, leaving it badly damaged, including the complete removal of the skull. Several hand phalanges were discovered underneath the pelvis, suggesting that the hands were placed either at the sides or bound to the sides of the body at burial. Most remaining bones were fragmented post-mortem to varying degrees. The ribs and vertebrae were poorly preserved. Also, many remaining bones were brittle and some further fragmented upon exhumation. Both the sciatic notch and blunt ischiopubic ramus suggests male, however, due to damage and the lack of a skull, a definitive determination was not possible. The epiphysis of the clavicles appeared to be fully fused, along with all the other remaining long bones, thus, the skeleton is an adult, at least older than 28-30 years. The inability to observe detention made any further age estimates impossible. 

 

Excavation year: 2022

E-23 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-35 (damaged) cm L-N/A      

            Humerus: not taken       

            Radius: N/A

            Ulna:  N/A               

Tibia: R-40 L-40.4  cm              

Fibula: R-N/A L-37.5  cm         

        

Pelvis (width):  N/A             

Entire length: N/A

 

Body Description:

            Body position: Extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: legs at east.

Position of hands: N/A

            Head position: N/A

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 1 (less than 30%)

           

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused:  Yes (from the bones present)

            Deciduous teeth: N/A

            Signs of osteoarthritis: none 

 

Age Estimation: Probable adult, data insufficient.

 

Cranial sex determination observations: Skull not present

 

Possible Sex: Unable to determine due to lack of skull or pelvis

 

Additional comments/observations: Grave was disturbed by initial mechanical excavations on first day of excavation. Only bones remaining were the lower appendicular remains and the right humerus. Both feet were present with the right foot laying on the distal side and left foot on its medial side both pointing to the south. The epiphyses of the tibias were both fused, suggesting that the interred was an adult.

 

 

Excavation year: 2022


 

E-26 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-48 L-48 cm  

            Humerus: R-35.5 L-33.5 cm      

            Radius: R-24.6 L-24.5 cm       

            Ulna: R-25.7 L-25.5 cm             

Tibia: 39.5 L-39.5 cm             

Fibula: R- 35.7 (damaged) L-35.7 cm        


       

Pelvis (width): 32.5 cm            

Entire length: 167 cm

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east.

Position of hands: folded over lower abdomen/pelvis at a 45-degree angle.

            Head position: slightly raised

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (over 60%)

           

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: no

            Signs of osteoarthritis: possibly

 

Age Estimation: Old Adult (50+ yrs)

 

Cranial sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: square

            Orbital rim: blunt          

            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced

            Forehead: upright              

            Mandible breadth:

            Nuchal crest: large

            Mastoid process: smooth  

            Mental eminence:  pronounced

 

Possible Sex: Male

 

Additional comments/observations: Some post-mortem damage to the anterior left humeral head Possible ossified cartilage found below the mandible. Due to the fragile nature of the maxilla, 5 teeth became dislodged: two incisors, canine, 2 pre-molars. Both proximal fibula heads were missing. All thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were extremely degraded and many broke upon exhumation. Some of the lumbar vertebrae appeared compressed. Significant root activity in the soil. Teeth samples taken of lower left P1 & P2 premolars for future aDNA analysis.

 

Excavation year: 2022


 

E-30 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-42.5 L-42.5 cm        

            Humerus: R-30 L-29 cm      

            Radius: R-23 L-21.5 cm          

            Ulna: R-25 L-24 cm             

Tibia: R-34 L-35 cm                

Fibula: R-31.5 L-30 cm             

Pelvis (width): 30 cm              

Entire length: 141 cm

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east.

Position of hands: crossed at pelvis, right over left, at 45-degree angle

            Head position: raised (possibly due to kyphosis)

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (over 60%)

           

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused:  yes

            Deciduous teeth: no

            Signs of osteoarthritis: yes 

 

Age Estimation: Old Adult (50+ yrs)

 

Cranial sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: square

            Orbital rim: blunt           

            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced

            Forehead: upright              

            Mandible breadth: wide

            Nuchal crest: smooth

            Mastoid process: large   

            Mental eminence: pronounced

 

Possible Sex: Male (also based on pelvic girdle data).

 

Additional comments/observations: These remains are from a what appeared to be a quite elderly male who suffered from kyphosis (i.e. ‘hunch-backed) resulting in spinal pathology that bent his back at an almost 90 degree angle. The cervical vertebrae were quite damaged pre-mortem and additional dirt appeared to have been packed under the head to compensate for failure to lay this person’s back completely supine at time of burial due to the kyphosis. Most of the teeth appeared to be missing pre-mortem with all the molars missing pre-mortem except for the lower M3 molars with the alveoli filled in with bone. Both lower left and right P1/P2 premolars were present, but quite worn. The mandible displayed significant atrophy. Maxilla contained right and left M1/M2, canines, and the front left incisor, all with significant attrition. Right 10th rib appeared to be fused to its connected vertebrae. Four of the thoracic vertebrae were fused together with a left rib (5th or 6th?) still attached. A small piece of weaved fabric discovered on left temporal lobe.

 

Excavation year:2022

E-31 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-43 L-42 cm             

            Humerus: R-16 (damaged) L-30.5 cm       

            Radius: R-23.5 L-24 cm          

            Ulna: R-25.5 L-25 cm      

        

Tibia: N/A                 

Fibula N/A        

Cranium   N/A        

Pelvis (width) 31 cm           

Entire length 112 cm (skull missing)

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east.

Position of hands: left folded back on itself, radius and ulna parallel (on top) of humerus. Right crossed over the chest, touching left forearm.

            Head position: N/A

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 2, (30%- 60%)

           

 

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: N/A

            Signs of osteoarthritis: no 

 

Age Estimation: Adult

 

Cranial Sex determination observations: skull missing.

 

 

Possible Sex: Male

 

Additional comments/observations: Mechanical excavation disturbed the gave resulting in destruction of skull and lower appendicular skeleton. No obvious pathology on remaining bones. Right humerus was fragmented with the proximal head found between the knees. Pelvis seems to indicate male with a blunt ischiopubic ramus. Significant root activity throughout the grave, including some than extended through the lumbar vertebrae and the sacrum. Many bones were brittle or had post-mortem damage. Definite age determination could not be made, though observable epiphyses appear fused.

 

 

Excavation year: 2022


 

E-33 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-45 L-45 cm       

      

            Humerus: R-31.5 L-31.4 cm       

            Radius: R-25 L-24.5 cm          

            Ulna: R-26.5 L-25.5 cm                

Tibia: R-41 L-40.5 cm             

Fibula: R- 36.5 (damaged) L-37.5 cm             

Pelvis (width): 27 cm             

Entire length: 131 cm (legs flexed)

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended (legs partially flexed), supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east

Position of hands: left arm prone alongside, right across abdomen at 90-degree angle.

            Head position: raised, gaze S/SE due to soil disturbance

 

Grave Goods: small cloth fragment (~6x6 mm) at elbow

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3, over 60%

           

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: no

            Signs of osteoarthritis: possible lipping on some vertebrae.

 

Age Estimation: Middle Adult (35-50 yrs)

 

Cranial sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: square

            Orbital rim: blunt           

            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced

            Forehead: upright              

            Mandible breadth: narrow

            Nuchal crest: rugged

            Mastoid process: small  

            Mental eminence: triangular

 

Possible Sex: Male.

 

Additional comments/observations: Legs flexed with the femurs facing north/northeast while at the knee the lower legs faced southeast. It was possible that those who interred the body failed to position the legs into the east side chamber extension that had been created for the legs, thus this caused the legs to flex. The left radius was slightly askance in situ. Cranium, mandible, and top vertebrae displaced north by 8 cm. C1-C-4 vertebrae were found within the mandible due to this displacement. The skull’s gaze was to the south/southeast. Considerable attrition on the upper incisors and all remaining teeth. Some teeth have a glassy appearance. Lower left M1, upper right M1 and M2, upper left M1 and M2 were missing pre-mortem with the alveoli partially for left M2 healed pre-mortem. Possible piece of cloth fragment (~6 x 6 mm) discovered at right forearm. Fragment of possible ossified cartilage found resting on clavicle. Possible pathology on the distal left humerus and medial right clavicle. Lipping on T7-L5, L-3 appears to be the worst. Teeth samples of lower right premolars (P1,P2) taken for future aDNA analysis.

Excavation year: 2022


 

E-34 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-46.5 L-46.5 cm        

            Humerus: 33.5 L-33.5 cm         

            Radius: R-26.75 L-26.75 cm    

            Ulna: R-29 L-29 cm                 

Tibia: R-41.5 L-41.5 cm  

            

Fibula: R-40 L-40 cm            

Pelvis (width): 34 cm            

Entire length: 186 cm

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east.

Position of hands: crossed over abdomen,

90-degree angles, left above right.

            Head position: raised

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (over 60%)

           

 

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: no

            Signs of osteoarthritis: no 

 

Age Estimation: Young Adult (20-35 yrs)

 

Cranial sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: square

            Orbital rim: blunt           

            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced

            Forehead: upright              

            Mandible breadth: wide

            Nuchal crest: no recorded

            Mastoid process: large  

            Mental eminence: pronounced. 

 

Possible Sex: Male

 

Additional comments/observations: The overall condition of this skeleton was excellent. Right fibula proximal head and left radius distal end broken on removal. On the right temporal lobe of the skull, a small 2 x 2 mm piece of fabric was found. Damage from taphonomy occurred to the distal head of the left femur and the proximal end of the left tibia. All the teeth, both in the maxilla and mandible were present, with some significant, yet uniform attrition. Male characteristics predominate on both the skull and pelvis. Age based on dentition (3rd molar present), epiphysial fusion, and pubic symphyseal surface suggest a young adult (20-35 yrs). Teeth samples from lower right premolars (P1/P2) for future aDNA analysis.

 

Excavation year: 2022


E-36 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-44.5 L-44.5 cm      

  

            Humerus: R- 30.5 (damaged) L-32 cm        

            Radius: R-23 (damaged) L-22.5 (damaged) cm

            Ulna: R-25.5 L-25.5 cm               

Tibia: R-36.5 L- 36 (damaged) cm             

Fibula: R- 32 (damaged) L- 30 (damaged) cm            

Pelvis (width): 27.5 cm             

Entire length: 163 cm

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east

Position of hands: right arm crossed over thoracic cavity at 60-degrees, left arm over abdomen at 90-degrees.

            Head position: raised

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (over 60%)

           

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: no

            Signs of osteoarthritis:  no

 

Age Estimation: Middle Adult (35-50 yrs), or possible Old Adult (over 50 yrs).

 

Cranial sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: square

            Orbital rim: blunt           

            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced

            Forehead: sloped              

            Mandible breadth: wide

            Nuchal crest: smooth

            Mastoid process: large 

            Mental eminence: triangular

 

Possible Sex: Male

 

Additional comments/observations: Both legs bow at the knees which point southward, but the tibia’s/fibula’s point east. Several tarsals and metatarsals were disarticulated during excavation. Left radius displaced to the north and lay perpendicular to the humerus by 10 cm This bone was moved during the excavation parallel to the right femur. Ischiopubic ramus was blunt. Pelvic girdle was narrow, and the sacrum was “chair-like.” Post-mortem damage present on right humerus, right ulna, left ulna, right and left tibia, and both fibulas. Some lipping present on lower thoracic vertebrae, ribs highly fragmented and fragile. Top of the sacrum either not fully fused or broke off during exhumation. Teeth sample from the lower left P1 and P2 (pre-molars) were taken for future aDNA analysis.

 

Excavation year: 2022


 

E-40 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-45.5 L-45.5 cm                    

            Humerus: R-32 L-32 cm       

 

            Radius: R-24 L-24 cm 

            Ulna: R-25.5 L-26 cm                

Tibia: R-36 L-36.5 cm               

Fibula: R-34.5 L-34 cm                 

Pelvis (width): 36 cm               

Entire length 177 cm

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east

Position of hands: crossed over abdomen right arm at 70-degree angle, over left at 90-degree angle.

            Head position: raised

 

Grave Goods: none.

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (over 60%)

           

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: no

            Signs of osteoarthritis: yes (lipping in vertebrae) 

 

Age Estimation: Middle Adult (35-50 yrs)

 

Cranial sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: round

            Orbital rim: blunt           

            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced

            Forehead: upright              

            Mandible breadth: wide

            Nuchal crest: smooth

            Mastoid process: large   

            Mental eminence: triangular

 

Possible Sex: Male

 

Additional comments/observations: Remains were brittle within the grave and several bones fragmented upon exhumation, including the splanchnocranium (facial skeleton). All the mandibular teeth were present expect left incisor which was missing post-mortem. Damage to the right temporal possibly due to root damage. The anterior of the orbits where the zygomatic meets the glabella were not connected. Significant lipping of the lumbar vertebrae and the upper thoracic suggests an older adult. Pelvic and cranial sex characteristics are male. Damage to the maxilla meant that only the right half of the dentition was observable. Uniform attrition along with examination of the pubic symphysis with a distinct rim suggests a person of middle age (35-50 yrs).

 

 

Excavation year: 2022


E-46 (Unit-ST 1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-47 L-47 cm             

            Humerus: R-32 L-32 cm       

            Radius: R-24.5 L-24.7 cm

            Ulna: R-26.5 L-26.3 cm                

Tibia: R-41 L- 36 (damaged) cm               

Fibula: R-37.5 L-33 (damaged) cm              

Pelvis (width): 29.5 cm            

Entire length: 172 cm

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east

Position of hands: crossed over lower abdomen, at 95-degree angle, left over right

            Head position: not raised, head askance to south.

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (over 60%)

           

 

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: no

            Signs of osteoarthritis: no 

 

Age Estimation: Middle Adult (35-50 yrs).

 

Cranial sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: square

            Orbital rim: blunt           

            Sub-orbital ridges: unpronounced

            Forehead: upright              

            Mandible breadth: wide

            Nuchal crest: smooth

            Mastoid process: small

            Mental eminence: triangular

 

Possible Sex: Male

 

Additional comments/observations: Initial excavations of the grave pit and around the skeleton, resulted in some disarticulation of the feet bones. Head askance to the south/ southeast. Missing upper-right 2nd molar alveolus was healed over. The right femur distal had post-mortem damage to the epicondyle. Post-mortem damage to both proximal and distal ends of both tibias. Left distal tibia was missing (post-mortem). Proximal and distal ends of left fibula missing. Right pelvic acetabulum partially detached due to post-mortem damage. Many ribs were fragmented (post-mortem) on both sides. Some damage to the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, probably caused by extensive root activity and some during exhumation due to the brittle nature of the bones. Lipping present on the L-4/5 vertebrae. Teeth samples were taken for future aDNA analysis.

 

Excavation year: 2022


E-48 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-45 L-44 cm             

            Humerus: R-32 L-32 cm       

            Radius: R-24.5 L-24.5 cm       

            Ulna: R-26.5 L-26.5 cm                 

Tibia: R-38 L-38 cm              

Fibula: R-37 L-35.5 (damaged) cm                          

Pelvis (width): 36 cm              

Entire length: 182 cm

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east.

Position of hands: left arm folded across abdomen at 75-degrees, right arm folded back on itself.

            Head position: raised

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grave 3 (over 60%)

           

 

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: no

            Signs of osteoarthritis: no 

 

Age Estimation: Middle Adult (35-50 yrs)

 

Cranial sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: square

            Orbital rim: blunt           

            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced

            Forehead: upright              

            Mandible breadth: wide

            Nuchal crest: rugged

            Mastoid process: large  

            Mental eminence: pronounced

 

Possible Sex: Male

 

Additional comments/observations: Several teeth of the maxilla were disarticulated post-mortem yet were present. Left femur bifurcated at the midpoint of the shaft post-mortem. At least 6 ribs broken post-mortem, also left clavicle. Possible osteoma on the right mandible under the 2nd molar. All mandible teeth were present, lower left 3rd molar had cavity, and the upper left 3rd molar and upper right 2nd molar had evidence of tooth decay. Attrition was uniform but wear suggests an age of over 40. Brief analysis of the epiphysial symphysis suggests and age of 50 or under. Depending on environmental circumstances of the period, this person may have been older than 50 yrs, however, skeletal features suggest a Middle Adult (35-50 yrs) at time of death.

 

 

Excavation year: 2022


 

E-55 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-39.8 L-39.6 cm                    

            Humerus: R-31 L-30 cm       

            Radius: R-22.7 L-22.5 cm       

            Ulna: R-(damaged) 23.3 L-24.5 cm                

Tibia: R-35 L-35 cm            

Fibula: R-33 L-33 cm                       

Pelvis (width): 29 cm               

Entire length: 147 cm

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east

Position of hands: crossed over abdomen, right arm at 70-degrees above left arm 90-degrees.

            Head position: raised

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (over 60%)

           

 

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: no

            Signs of osteoarthritis: no 

 

Age Estimation: Young Adult (20-35 yrs)

 

Cranial sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: square

            Orbital rim: blunt           

            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced

            Forehead: upright              

            Mandible breadth: wide

            Nuchal crest: rugged

            Mastoid process: large  

            Mental eminence: pronounced

 

Possible Sex: Male

 

Additional comments/observations: A slightly built individual, with a long, angular skull, but both cranial and pelvic characteristics favor male (blunt ischiopubic ramus). All teeth present, with uniform, yet slight attrition. Third molars and all long bones appear to be fully fused. Pubic symphyses had a distinct rim with no lipping. Based on teeth attrition and public symphyses, this male ranges between 20-35 years at time of death.

 

 

Excavation year: 2022

E-56 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-46 L-46 cm            

    

            Humerus: R-31 L-30 cm       

            Radius: R-24 L-23 cm   

            Ulna: R-24.5 L-23.5 cm              

Tibia: R-40 L-40.5 cm              

Fibula: R-36 L-36 cm                          

Pelvis (width): 32 cm              

Entire length: 173.5 cm

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east

Position of hands: crossed at pelvis, 75-degree angle.

            Head position: not raised

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (over 60%)

           

 

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: no

            Signs of osteoarthritis:  yes (proximal finger, slow growth arthritis; three fused lumbar vertebrae)

 

Age Estimation: Old Adult (50+ yrs)

 

Cranial sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: square

            Orbital rim: blunt         

            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced

            Forehead: sloped               

            Mandible breadth: wide

            Nuchal crest: smooth

            Mastoid process: large  

            Mental eminence: triangular

 

Possible Sex: Male

 

Additional comments/observations: Most upper teeth present (all in the maxilla), right M1 was missing pre-mortem. First right lower incisor in mandible missing post-mortem. Skull features mixed as to sex, but this combined with pelvic characteristics (narrow sciatic notch, chair-like sacrum) suggests male. Right zygomatic bone broken probably due to root damage, underside of skull damaged in some way. Proximal finger, probably P1 or P2 shows evidence of arthritis. Large robust bones suggest male. Lumbar vertebrae 3 through 5 were fused together.

 

 

Excavation year: 2022


 

E-59 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-46.3 L-46 cm           

            Humerus: R-32 L-31.6 cm       

            Radius: R-24.5 L-24.6 cm       

            Ulna: R-27 L-27 cm           

Tibia: R-38 L-37 cm               

Fibula: R-35 L-36 cm                      

Pelvis (width): 36 cm             

Entire length: 174 cm

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

            Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east

Position of hands: right hand across lower abdomen (L-4/5 vertebrae) at 90-degree angle, left hand across thoracic cavity (T-9 vertebra) at 110-degree angle.

            Head position: raised

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (over 60%)

           

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: no

            Signs of osteoarthritis: no

 

Age Estimation: Old Adult (50+ yrs)

 

Cranial sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: N/A

            Orbital rim: blunt           

            Sub-orbital ridges: N/A

            Forehead: upright              

            Mandible breadth: wide

            Nuchal crest: smooth

            Mastoid process: large  

            Mental eminence: pronounced

 

Possible Sex: Male

 

Additional comments/observations: Significant damage to the maxilla and the front of the skull due to a shovel strike during excavation. Femurs appear slightly bowed. Most of the skull inferior to the frontal bone on the anterior side was damaged, but the mandible was mostly intact. While anterior of skull was significantly damaged during excavation, the remaining features such as the mastoid process and mental eminence have male characteristics. The pelvic girdle with its blunt ischiopubic ramus and lack of subpubic concavity also suggested male. The mandible was atrophied, with all the molars and premolars, except the 3rd molar, on the lower right side completely missing. Left side of mandible still had premolars, but M1 and M2 were missing. All the alveoli on the mandible had grown over. Due to damage, only 2 teeth remained in the maxilla. All the remaining teeth showed significant attrition. Thus, remains should be considered over 50 yrs.

Excavation year: 2022


 

E-63 (Unit-ST-1)

 

Measurements:

            Femur: R-50.5 L-51 cm

            Humerus: R-35 L-36 cm        

            Radius: R-25 L-24.5 cm          

            Ulna: R-27.5 L-27 cm               

Tibia: R-40.5 L-40.5 cm                

Fibula: R-36.5 L-37.5 cm                        

Pelvis (width) 36 cm             

Entire length 175 cm

 

Body Description:

            Body position: extended, supine.

Directional orientation of the body: west-to-east.

Position of hands: crossed over upper abdomen at 90-degree angles, right above left.

            Head position: not raised, gaze to north

 

Grave Goods: none

 

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (over 60%)

           

Age determination estimation features:

            Epiphyses fused: yes

            Deciduous teeth: no

            Signs of osteoarthritis: possible degeneration of the joint in the L-5 lumbar. 

 

Age Estimation: Old Adult (50+ yrs)

 

Cranial sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: square

            Orbital rim:  blunt          

            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced

            Forehead: sloped              

            Mandible breadth: wide

            Nuchal crest: rugged

            Mastoid process: large  

            Mental eminence: pronounced

 

Possible Sex: Male

 

Additional comments/observations: This grave was discovered in the south baulk of excavation unit ST-1, thus the grave was excavated in the profile. The right fibula proximal end fragmented. Some ribs were also fragmented post-mortem. Possible ossified cartilage found. Lower left molar was cracked to the root. Cracked upper left second molar. Missing first and second upper right molars pre-mortem. Some lipping on the L-5 lumbar vertebra. Calculus build-up on the teeth. One of the thoracic vertebrae was broken post-mortem and many have had post-mortem damage. While, the overall dental attrition was good, based on the teeth and a quick analysis of the pubic symphysial surface along with the presence of ossified cartilage, suggests an age over 50. Both pelvic and cranial sex indicators suggest male.

 

Excavation year: 2022


 

Radiocarbon dating

By accelerated mass spectrometry of organic samples from the excavations of the Suleimantepa 1 necropolis[1]

In order to determine the absolute age, three organic samples were analyzed in the mass spectrometry laboratory of the Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Vilnius, using a Single stage accelerator mass spectrometer (SSAMS, NEC, USA), Automated Graphitization Equipment AGE-3 (IonPlus AG) (Table 1). The dates obtained were calibrated in OxCal V 4.4.2 software using the IntCal20 calibration curve[2].

On April 10, 2022, in the vicinity of Sulemin Tepe and the Islamic pilgrimage site of Chor Chinor just outside the town of Urgut, Uzbekistan approximately 125 m from the site of a church/monastery first excavated in late 1990s/early 2000s, four people (Dr. Dmitry Voyakin, Natasha Voyakin, Dr. Steven Gilbert, and Elizabeth Gilbert) discovered human remains (two cranial fragments, a femur with the distal and proximal ends missing, a right radius also with the distal and proximal ends missing, and a vertebrae, either from the lower thoracic region or the lumbar region) (see Fig. 1).

Sample No. URG_22_01_01

For radiocarbon analysis, sample were taken from the human radius bone (Fig. 2).

 

Fig. 1 - Construction area (24 x 23) with skull fragments (below) and feature in baulk

 

 

Fig. 2 - Human radius (inferior view)

 

The cumulative calibrated chronological interval at a probability of 95.4 % covers a range of actually two centuries – from 772 AD to 979 AD. At 85.8 % probability the date interval ranges from 821 AD to 979AD. (See Table 1). As indicated in the reference data on the calibration curve and calibration procedure, the context and features of the selected sample shall be taken into account.

As a result of the laboratory studies the necropolis can be dated by 8-10 cc AD. The radiocarbon date corresponds to the relative dating of the monastery suggested by archaeologists.

 

Table 1 - Results of radiocarbon dating analysis of sample No. URG_22_01_01


 

Conclusion for Excavation ST_1 (graveyard)

 

The excavations which have revealed a cemetery and human remains at Suleyman Tepa (ST-1) in Urgut, Uzbekistan provide significant information regarding the inhabitants of the early medieval monastery, a structure revealed by previous excavations just over two decades ago. The current interpretation is that this cemetery contained the remains of the monks who lived at this monastery (and based on radiocarbon data obtained from remains discovered at the site in April 2022) date to the 9th and 10th century and the osteological information provides strong evidence for this interpretation.

Just a cursory examination of the skeletal data demonstrates the most obvious conclusion that all the interred which could be conclusively identified (13 of 17 graves) were male. Three of the four graves for which sex determination could not be determined did not have a skull and pelvis due to damage either from either previous construction work or from mechanical excavation during the initial revealing of the cemetery. The fourth grave for which sex determination was inconclusive was from a possible adolescent which made a definitive conclusion less certain. Even these four graves all had adult-sized, robust bones which support the conclusion that all the interred were male. Comparison with other Church of the East Christian cemeteries within Central Asia reveal a broad mixture of adult and sub-adult burials interspersed and even buried together, possibly in familial groups. No other strictly segregated male cemetery is known within Central Asia.

Such evidence seems to affirm Savchenko’s initial conclusion that the structure just 500 meters to the north of the cemetery was a monastery and Dickens and Savchenko’s observation that the cave inscriptions on the cliffs and caves encircling both the cemetery and the monastic site have male names and were locations in which the monks held prayer vigils.

That the cemetery is Christian is undisputed by the presence of west-to-east burials. Every grave is oriented in this fashion with the body placed supine with the head of the interred placed on the west side and the feet on the east end of the burial chamber. Ten of the thirteen burials with intact skulls (77%) all had the head raised slightly and backed by a soil “pillow.” This practice has been documented in Central Asian Christian individual graves in Sogd (Uzbekistan) as well as cemeteries in Semirechye/Zhetisu (Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan) during the medieval period. It was also a wide-spread practice throughout Christendom at the time.

The regimental nature of the burials in which the entrance chambers visible from the surface appear regularly in north-south rows along with the consistency of the burial type speak to order in the community. Hand positions of the deceased were relatively uniform, with some variation. Only one body had both arms prone along the side. Three of the bodies had one of the arms folded back, with the hand probably placed over the thoracic cavity— probably covering the heart—and the other arm crossed over the abdomen. Four of the interred had both arm folded across the abdomen at either 90 or 45 degrees, usually with one hand above the other. One of the interred had the right arm at 60 degrees over the thoracic cavity, again, covering the heart, with the left across the abdomen; another with the right hand at 70 degrees over the heart and left hand over the chest.

None of the graves in ST_1 contained any grave goods. In fact, the cultural material was almost non-existent in the soil fill of the whole cemetery with only 2 pottery fragments discovered across the entirety of the revealed unit. Even for Christian cemeteries, which are notorious for their lack of grave goods, the complete absence of even small pieces of jewelry on the body such as a ring—which have been discovered in other Christian burial contexts in Central Asia—provides another possible piece of evidence that the burials in ST-1 were a group of aesthetic monks, accustomed to a life of self-imposed poverty.

Three of the graves (E-30, E-33, E-34) all had micro-sized fragments of cloth (two on the temporal lobe, one at the elbow). These were from rough material (yet to be analyzed as to composition) of a simple weave. These were either from the clothes they may have been buried in, or potentially may come from a burial shroud. Evidence for a shroud in at least one case comes from E-33. This body appeared to have been placed in the grave in such a way that the lower appendages (specifically the tibias and fibulas) were partially flexed possibly since those who interred the body misplaced the legs which should have extended into a small tunnel-like extension dug especially for the legs. Such placement in a dark burial chamber that extended to the east from the initial entrance pit would be understandable, particularly if the body was previously enclosed in a shroud making identification of individual limbs difficult. Another possibility is that the deceased was buried in his monastic habit which could have included a hood or headpiece as a part of the garment; thus, these fabric fragments were from the monks’ clothing, specifically in and around the head, and preserved for more than 1000 years.

Another striking feature is that 10 out of the 13 age estimable skeletons were probably over the age of 35 at time of death, with five of those (38%) over age 50. In fact, in a couple of instances the interred was probably much older than 50 years at time of death (see E-30). While age determination in the field is difficult and many factors such as dentition and pelvic feature (i.e. pubic symphyses, auricular surface of the pelvis) have to be carefully examined to make an accurate estimate, preliminary findings suggest that this community of men lived—for the period in question— lengthy and relatively healthy lives. Is this potential evidence to confirm Ibn-Hawqal’s statement concerning the reason for locating the monastery at Urgut (ancient Wazkird) due to its “healthiness?” (Ibn-Hawqal quoted in Dickens, 2017, 206) Even today, the area has fresh air and clean streams that flow from the mountain glaciers with thriving fruit orchards and grapes still growing in the valley (including on the site of the monastery remains). Fresh water sources alone, combined with a strict, simple diet, play a significant factor in community health which appears to have created an environment that allowed those interred at Suleman Tepe to thrive physiologically under such conditions.

More can be learned physiologically and genetically if aDNA analysis can be conducted on the remains. Excavators carefully extracted teeth samples from six skeletons (E-21, E-26, E-33, E-34, E-36, E-46) which involved using protective gear to guard against contamination once the teeth had been revealed to extract teeth, usually the premolars, which have the best potential of retaining blood in the roots, thus sufficient for adequate sampling. Of course, those remains with intact skulls can also have the auditory ossicles extracted to insure the best samples with the least outside contamination. Modern laboratory analysis including both aDNA and stable isotope could provide a wealth of information regarding genetic ancestry, pathology, and migration.


 

Bibliography

 

Ashurov, B. (2013) Tarsakya: An Analysis of Sogdian Christianity Based on Archaeological,

Numismatic, Epigraphic and Textual Sources, PhD Diss. (London: Department of Religious Studies, SOAS, University of London). 

Ashurov, B. (2018) “’Sogdian Christianity’: Evidence from Architecture and Material

Culture,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Series 3:1-42. 

Baumer, C. (2014) History of Central Asia, Vol 2: The Age of the Silk Roads.London:

I.B. Tauris. 

Baumer, C. (2015) “Archäologie schreibt Geschichte“, in Neue Zürcher Zeitung (11 April) 83: 59-60.  

Baumer, C. (2016) The Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian Christianity (New Ed. London: I.B. Tauris). 

Baumer, C. (2016) History of Central Asia, Vol. 3: The Age of Islam and the Mongols (London: I.B. Tauris). 

Dickens, M. (2009) “Syriac Gravestones in the Tashkent History Museum,” Hidden
Treasures and Intercultural Encounters, eds. D. Winkler and L. Tang. Münster, Lit Verlag.

Dickens, M. (2010) “Patriarch Timothy I and the Metropolitan of the Turks,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 3rd Ser.,20, 2: 117-139. 

Dickens, M. (2017) “Syriac Inscriptions Near Urgut, Ubekistan” Studia Iranica 46:205-260. 

Dickens, M. (2020) Echoes of a Forgotten Presence: Reconstructing the History of the Church of the East in Central Asia. Orientalia-Patristica-Oecumenica, Vol. 15, ed. D. Winkler. Zurich, Lit Verlag. 

Fox, Sherry C. and Paraskevi Tritsaroli, (2019) “Burials and Human Remains of the Eastern
Mediterranean in Early Christian Context” in David K. Pettegrew, et. al., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Archaeology (New York: Oxford University Press): 105-126. 

Gilbert, S. (2022) “The Church of the East Cemetery at Ilibalyk,” Silk Road Traces: Studies on Syriac Christianity in China and Central Asia. Eds. Li Tang and D. Winkler (Berlin: Lit Verlag). 

Haas, Christopher (2014) “The Caucasus“ in William Tabbernee, ed., Early Christianity in Contexts: An Exploration across Cultures and Continents: 111-141. 

Jullien, F. (2018). “Forms of the Religious Life and Syriac Monasticism,” The Syriac

World. Ed. D. King. London: Routledge.  

Kolchenko, Valery (2002) “Заметки О Христианстве В Чуйской Долине В Средние Века,” (Notes about Christianity in the Chui Valley in the Middle Ages)”, Коомдук илимдер журналга (Bishkek: Kyrgyz-Turkish University "Manas”): 163-182. 

Kolchenko, V. (2003) “Периодизация распространения христианства в Средней

Азии по данным археологии” (The periods when Christianity Spread into Central Asia according to Archeology), Буддизм и христианство в культурном наследии Центральной Азии (Buddhism and Christianity in the cultural heritage of Central Asia) (Bishkek): 53-73. 

Kolchenko, V. (2013) “Кара-Джигачское (При-Пишпекское) средневековое
кладбище (археологический аспект)” [Kara-Dzhigachskoe (Pre-Pishpek) medieval cemetery (the archaeological aspect)], An International Paschal Reader: Collection of Materials (Bishkek): 81-83. 

Kolchenko, V. (2018) “Кыргызстан, (Kyrgyzstan) ”in D. A. Voyakin, ed., Религии Центральной Азии и Азербайджана. Том IV. Христианство, (Religions in Central Asia and Azerbaijan. Vol. 4, Christianity) Samarkand: International Institute for Central Asian Studies, 2018: 48-103. 

Masson Michail E. (1955) "K voprosu o chernykh dirkhemakh museiyabi", Trudy Instituta istorii i arkheologii AN Uzbekskoi SSR, vii, Tashkent: 175–196. 

Savchenko, A. (1996) “Urgut Revisited”, ARAM.The Journal of the Society for Syro-MesopotamianStudies 8. 1-2: 333-54. 

Savchenko, A. (2005) “По поводу кхристианского селения Ургут” (On the Christian settlement of Urgut), Zapiski Vostochnogo otdeleniya Rossiĭskogo arkheologicheskogo obshchestva 2. 27 (St. Petersburg). [Version also in English] 

Savchenko, A. (2010) “Östliche Urkirche in Usbekistan,“ Antike Welt 2.10: 73-82. 

Savchenko, A. and M. Dickens (2009), “Prester John’s Realm: New Light on Christianity between Merv and Turfan,” The Christian Heritage of Iraq (Gorgias Eastern Christian Studies 13), ed. Erica C.D. Hunter (Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias): 121-135. 

Stewart, Charles A. (2018) “Churches,” in The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Archaeology, eds. T. Davis, W. Caraher and D. Pettegrew (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press): 127-146. 

Stewart, Charles. A. (2020) “The Four-Petal Almond Rosette in Central Asia” Bulletin of the

International Institute of Central Asian Studies 30. IICAS: Samarkand. 69-84. [English & Russian].

 

Sweetman, Rebecca (2019) “Community, Church, and Conversion in the Prefecture of Illyricum and the Cyclades” in David K. Pettegrew, et. al., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Archaeology (New York: Oxford University Press): 515-536. 

Treadwell Luke (2007) “The monetary history of the Bukharkhuda dirham (“black dirham”) in Samanid Transoxania (204–395/819–1005)”, Coinage and history in the Seventh Century Near East, Supplement to the Oriental Numismatic Society Journal, 193: 25–40.

Walker John (1941) A catalogue of the Arab-Sassanian coins, London: The British Museum: xcv–xcvi.

White, T. and P. Folkens (2005) The Human Bone Manual. (Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press).

 

| copyright by The Society for the Exploration of EurAsia| E-mail | Home |  

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 


Appendix. Grave Comparison





  

  


Appendix. Results of GPR surveying

 

Introduction

During many years the usage of ground penetrating radar is being a part of world-wide standard complex of field archaeological practice used together with other geophysical research methods. Traditional archaeological methods cannot guaranty the identification of the site on the large territory because of the need of serious labor efforts and short time limits. At the same time, usage of nondestructive and noncontact methods of data collection, high maintainability, and low maintenance cost are the strong points of scanning method with the use of ground penetrating radar.

New main direction of world archeology is the study of archaeological sites without damaging its structures and its integrity. Studies of archaeological structures on a distance are extremely important due to the reason that some archaeological sites can be irreparably lost during excavation process. Ground penetrating radar can be used in archeology for different research works from studies of historical sites that are never going to experience excavation process to fast and cheep studies of presumptive sites for planning of future excavation works. Ground penetrating research works can be realized on any type of surface: black soil, concrete, ceramic tiles and even water surface (studies of submerged sites).

 

Operating Principle

Ground penetrating radar was designed for identification of subsurface structural-material inhomogenuities of different origin related to unequal watering of soil deposits, different composition of the soil, particularities of rock structures and textures (soil openness and banding), inhomogenuity of soil deposits and materials, jointing and deformity of the soil environment, and inclusion of foreign objects.

Usage of ground penetrating method of shallow geophysics also known as subsurface radiolocation or radar probing is the representation of highly-accurate electromagnetic signal from the border of the section in the upper part of the cut – from the stratigraphic border, levels of water saturation, outlines of studied objects, foundations etc.

Interpretation of ground penetrating data is a quiet complicated creative task due to the fact that the theoretical part of the method realization and mathematic device used for data interpretation are underdeveloped. Moreover many studied territories with radar-location method represented by industrial cuts of quaternary deposits, cultural layers, underground engineering constructions, archaeological sites and other areas that can be characterized by complicated and unhomogeneous structure, inclusion of different inhomogenuities, unhomogeneous and noncontinuous watering that creates complicated wavy pictures on the radiogram and aggravates comparison of geophysical anomalies with real subsurface sites.

As the result, the aim of the interpretation of radar data is the radiogram transformation into stratigraphic deposit cuts, identification and separation of natural and industrial buried inhomogenuities, their comparison with real sites and identification of their parameters (depth, size, conservation status etc.).

 

Used Equipment

Ground penetrating radar GSSI SIR-3000 with antenna frequency of 270 Mhz that permits to scan on the depth of 5 meters was used during the geomagnetic scanning process.

 

Research Target

Conducting geomagnetic scanning in the territory of future archaeological excavations in order to identify buried structures. (see fig. 1).

Tasks

Based on the target, a number of tasks were identified:

1. Conducting a geomagnetic scan at two sites located south of the monastery Area 1;

2. Carrying out geomagnetic scanning of three sites in the territory of the alleged burial ground Area 2

In June 2022, geophysical works were carried out at the site of Suleimantepa (monastery complex) and Suleimantepa 1 (monastery necropolis). Field studies on the collection of geophysical data were implemented by the International Institute for Central Asian Studies and the Yahyo Gulyamov Institute of Archaeology, Samarkand, Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences. IICAS research fellows Dmitry Voyakin and Denis Sorokin, Oxford University Ph.D. student Benjamin Sharkey, and the research fellow-assistant of the Institute of Archaeology  took part in the fieldwork. Subsequent processing and analysis of the data were conducted by Denis Sorokin.

Description of scan areas and results

1. Area #1 is located 300 meters south of the monastery on a hillside. The purpose of the scanning in this area was to identify the ground graves. The reason for this was the discovery of human remains in the profile of the slope at a depth of about 2 meters from the modern surface.

Three sites were prepared in this area (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 157-165).

Site No. 1 is located in the southeastern part of area No. 2, its dimensions are 16x11 meters, extending from west to east. The plot is located in the territory of a vineyard on a slope, between bushes and trees.

Scanning was performed longitudinally, step 50 cm, scanning depth 40 ns.

As a result of the analysis of scanning data were identified anomalies related to the modern period - traces of agricultural activity, roots of trees. The presence of ground graves in this area is possible, but due to the complex relief of the surface are difficult to determine. Additional inspection and correlation with the data of archaeological works is required.

Site No. 2 is located in the northeastern part of the area. In the same conditions as site No.1. Its dimensions are 13x4.5 meters. Scanning was conducted longitudinally, step 50 cm, scanning depth 40 ns.

As well as at site #1, the analysis of scanning data revealed anomalies relating to the modern period - traces of agricultural activity, the roots of trees. The presence of ground graves in this area is possible, but due to the complex topography of the surface are difficult to determine. Additional inspection and correlation with the data of archaeological works is required.

Site No. 3 is located in the southwestern part of area No. 2 along the cliff in which human remains were found.

Scanning was conducted longitudinally, step 50 cm, scanning depth 40 ns.

As a result of the analysis of scanning data were identified anomalies throughout the area of the site, high density anomalies stretching from west to east their size varies from 2 to 6 meters. At this site in 2022, archaeological work was carried out as a result of which revealed an unpaved burial ground, graves orientation west-east, the average size of the grave structure 3.5 meters. For more accurate results it is necessary to carry out scanning in transverse direction also with a step of 50 cm.

2. Area #2 is located south of the monastery. It is divided into two areas. Site #1 is located southeast of the monastery, its dimensions are 24x8 meters, extending from north to south. This site is located on a flat leveled area used for growing fodder grasses. At the time of scanning, the grass was up to 1 meter high (see Appendix “Photos”, fig. 166).

Scans were carried out in longitudinal and transverse directions with a step of 50 cm. The scanning depth was 40 ns.

As a result of the analysis of geomagnetic scanning data the following results were obtained:

1. At a depth of 0 to 127 cm high density anomalies are seen, their greater concentration is in the northern and southern parts of the site;

2. In the northern part of the site is adjacent to the excavations of previous years and anomalies located in the northern part of the most likely belong to the dumps of these excavations;

3. In the southeastern part of the site is also located high density anomaly has no clear shape.

Summarizing the results we can say that in this area no obvious structures found.

Site number 2 is located south-west of the monastery, its dimensions 19x9 meters, stretches along a line north-south. As well as site #1, the surface of site #2 is levelled for agricultural purposes and at the time of scanning is covered with dense vegetation.

Scans were conducted in longitudinal and transverse directions with a step of 50 cm. The scanning depth was 40 ns.

The following results were obtained as a result of geomagnetic scanning data analysis:

1. At a depth of 0 to 76 cm revealed anomalies in the extreme northern and southern parts of the site, in the central part of the site can be seen traces of low density anomalies, most likely related to the lower layers;

2. From a depth of 51 cm and up to 127 cm in the area of the site can be seen high density anomalies and they are located throughout the area of the site. Chi can be divided into three parts - northern, central and southern. The northern part is located along the northern edge of the site and is separated from the central part by a strip of low density, about two meters wide, running across the site. In the central part of the site is also visible band of anomalies with a width of about six meters within which you can see individual anomalies rounded shape. In the southern part of the site revealed a band width of about 6 meters on which are anomalies in the form of lines extending from north to south.

Summarizing the results obtained, we can say that in this area there are three separate large structures, stretching from west to east. The northern part of the site was excavated in 2022, at a depth of 1.3 meters was revealed paving of large pebbles.


 

Figure 1 - Scheme of scanning areas (satellite background)

 

Figure 2 – Area №1. Site’s location

Figure 3 – Area 1, Site №1. Survey scheme

Figure 15 – Area №2. Site’s location

Figure 16 – Area 2, Site №1. Survey scheme

Figure 17 - Scan results. Depth 0-51 cm. Area 2, Site №1

 

Appendix. Photos

 

Figure 1 – General view of the Area ST - monastery before the start of work. South-west view

Figure 2 – General view of the Area ST - monastery before the start of work. South-east view

Figure 3 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1 before the start of work. West view

Figure 4 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1 before the start of work. North view

Figure 5 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1 before the start of work. South view

Figure 6 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1 workflow – removing of upper layer. South-west view

Figure 7 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #1. West view

Figure 8 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #2. West view

Figure 9 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #3. North-east view

Figure 10 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #4. North-east view

Figure 11 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #5. East view

Figure 12 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #6. North-west view

Figure 13 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #7. North-east view

Figure 14 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #8. West view

Figure 15 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #9. South view

Figure 16 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #10. West view

Figure 17 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #11. West view

Figure 18 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #12. North view

Figure 19 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #13. North view

Figure 20 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #15. West view

Figure 21 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #16. North view

Figure 22 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #17. Workflow. North view

Figure 23 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #18. Workflow. North view

Figure 24 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #18. East view

Figure 25 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #19. East view

Figure 26 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #20. West view

Figure 27 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #21. South view

Figure 28 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #22. East view

Figure 29 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #23. North view

Figure 30 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #24. North view

Figure 31 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #25. North view

Figure 32 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #25. North view

Figure 33 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #27. South view

Figure 34 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #29. West view

Figure 35 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #30. South-west view

Figure 36 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, element #30. South-west view

Figure 37 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, general view. North-west view

Figure 38 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, general view. East view

Figure 39 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, north stratigraphy profile. North view

Figure 40 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, east stratigraphy profile. East view

Figure 41 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, south stratigraphy profile. South view

Figure 42 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, west stratigraphy profile. West view

Figure 43 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, general view. West view

Figure 44 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1, general view. South view

Figure 45 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1-3, general view. South view

Figure 46 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #2, general view. Top view

Figure 43 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #2, final view. West view

Figure 44 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #3, final view. West view

Figure 45 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #3, final view. South-east view

Figure 46 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #3, final view - floor. Top view

Figure 47 – Area ST – monastery. Excavation #1-3, backfill. South view

Figure 48 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. General view. Top view

Figure 49 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. General view. South view

Figure 50 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. General view. East view

Figure 51 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Workflow. West view

Figure 52 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Workflow. East view

Figure 53 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Workflow. West view

Figure 54 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #2. West view

Figure 55 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #5 – grave pit. North view

Figure 56 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #5, 22 before cleaning. South view

Figure 57 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #5, 22 after cleaning. North view

Figure 58 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #5 closing photo. West view

Figure 59 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #6 – grave pit. North view

Figure 60 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #6 before cleaning. North-west view

Figure 61 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #6, 31 after cleaning. North-west view

Figure 62 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #6 closing photo. South view

Figure 63 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #7 before cleaning. South view

Figure 64 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #7, 23 after cleaning. South view

Figure 65 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #7 closing photo. South view

Figure 66 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #8 – grave pit. South view

Figure 67 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #8, 28, 29, 33 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 68 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #8, 28, 29, 33 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 69 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #8, 28, 29, 33 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 70 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #8, 28, 29, 33 closing photo. East view

Figure 71 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #9, 25, 30 – grave pit. North view

Figure 72 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #9, 25, 30 after cleaning. East view

Figure 73 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #9, 25, 30 after cleaning. East view

Figure 74 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #9, 25, 30 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 75 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #9, 25, 30 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 76 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #9 closing photo. East view

Figure 77 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #10, 34 grave pit. Top view

Figure 78 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #10, 34 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 79 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #10, 34 after cleaning. West view

Figure 80 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #10 closing photo. West view

Figure 81 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #11 grave pit. East view

Figure 82 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #11, 35, 36, 39 after cleaning. South-east view

Figure 83 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #11, 35, 36, 39 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 84 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #11 closing photo. East view

Figure 85 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #12 grave pit. West view

Figure 86 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #12, 19, 20, 21 after cleaning. West view

Figure 87 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #12 closing photo. West view

Figure 88 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #13 closing photo. North-east view

Figure 89 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #14 grave pit. West view

Figure 90 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #14, 37, 38, 40 after cleaning. East view

Figure 91 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #14, 37, 38, 40 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 92 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #14 closing photo. East view

Figure 93 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #15 grave pit. North view

Figure 94 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #15, 43, 51, 52, 56 after cleaning. West view

Figure 95 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #15, 43, 51, 52, 56 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 96 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #15, 43, 51, 52, 56 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 97 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #15 closing photo. East view

Figure 98 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #16 grave pit. South view

Figure 99 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #16 grave pit. East view

Figure 100 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #16 grave pit. Top view

Figure 101 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #16, 44, 45, 46 after cleaning. East view

Figure 102 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #16, 44, 45, 46 after cleaning. South view

Figure 103 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #16 closing photo. East view

Figure 104 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #17 grave pit. South view

Figure 105 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #17, 26, 27, 41 after cleaning. South view

Figure 106 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #17, 26, 27, 41 after cleaning. South-east view

Figure 107 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #17 after cleaning. South view

 

 

Figure 108 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #17 closing photo. East view

Figure 109 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #18 grave pit. East view

Figure 110 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #18, 53, 54, 55, 57 after cleaning. West view

Figure 111 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #18, 53, 54, 55, 57 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 112 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #18 closing photo. East view

Figure 113 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #47, 48, 49, 50 after cleaning. North view

Figure 114 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #47, 48, 49, 50 after cleaning. East view

Figure 115 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #47, 48, 49, 50 after cleaning. West view

Figure 116 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #47, 48, 49, 50 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 117 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #58 grave pit. West view

Figure 118 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #58, 59 after cleaning. South view

Figure 119 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #58, 59 after cleaning. South view

Figure 120 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #60, 61, 62 grave pit. South view

Figure 121 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #60, 61, 62, 63 after cleaning. South view

Figure 122 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #60, 61, 62, 63 after cleaning. South view

Figure 123 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #60, 61, 62, 63 after cleaning. South view

Figure 124 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #60, 61, 62, 63 after cleaning. South view

Figure 125 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #60, 61, 62, 63 after cleaning. South-east view

Figure 126 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #60, 61, 62, 63 after cleaning. South view

Figure 127 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. Element #60, 61, 62, 63 closing photo. South view

 

 

Figure 128 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. General view. Closing photo. West view

Figure 129 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. General view. Closing photo. East view

Figure 130 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. General view. Closing photo. South view

Figure 131 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. General view. Backfilling. West view

Figure 132 – Area ST_1 – cemetery. General view. Backfilling. East view

Figure 133 – Area 1 – petroglyphs. General view. South view

Figure 134 – Area 1 – petroglyphs. General view. North view

Figure 135 – Area 1 – petroglyphs - crosses. General view. South view

Figure 136 – Area 1 – petroglyphs - crosses. South view

Figure 137 – Area 1 – petroglyphs - crosses. South view

Figure 138 – Area 1 – petroglyphs - inscriptions. South view

Figure 139 – Area 2 – petroglyphs – general view. South view

Figure 140 – Area 2 – petroglyphs – general view. South view

Figure 141 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 142 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 143 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 144 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 145 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 146 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 147 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 148 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 149 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 150 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 151 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 152 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 153 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 154 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 155 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 156 – Area 2 – petroglyphs - inscriptions

Figure 157 – GPR - Area 1. General view. SE view

Figure 158 – GPR - Area 1. Equipment preparation

Figure 159 – GPR - Area 1. Marking of the scanning area

Figure 160 – GPR - Area 1. Marking of the scanning area

Figure 161 – GPR - Area 1. GPR setting

Figure 162 – GPR - Area 1. GPR setting

Figure 163 – GPR - Area 1, site 3. Surveying process

Figure 164 – GPR - Area 1, site 3. Surveying process

Figure 165 – GPR - Area 1, site 2. Surveying process

Figure 166 – GPR - Area 2, site 1. Surveying process


 

Appendix. Artefacts

 

Fig. 1 - ST_22_01_01_18

Fig. 2 - ST_22_01_02_3

Fig. 3 - ST_22_01_08_1

Fig. 4 - ST_22_01_08_3

Fig. 5 - ST_22_01_10_1

Fig. 6 - ST_22_01_12_1

Fig. 7 - ST_22_01_12_2

Fig. 8 - ST_22_01_13_4

Fig. 9 - ST_22_01_13_2

Fig. 10 - ST_22_01_13_3

Fig. 11 - ST_22_01_13_4

Fig. 12 - ST_22_01_13_5

Fig. 13 - ST_22_01_13_6

Fig. 14 - ST_22_01_16_1

Fig. 15 - ST_22_01_1

Fig. 16 - ST_22_01_17_3

Fig. 17 - ST_22_01_17_2

Fig. 18 - ST_22_01_17_5

Fig. 19 - ST_22_01_17_1

Fig. 20 - ST_22_01_17_3

Fig. 21 - ST_22_01_17_6

Fig. 22 - ST_22_01_18_7

Fig. 23 - ST_22_01_18_1

Fig. 24 - ST_22_01_18_3

Fig. 25 - ST_22_01_18_2

Fig. 26 - ST_22_01_27_1

Fig. 27 - ST_22_01_13_1

Fig. 28 - ST_22_01_30_1

Fig. 29 - ST_22_01_30_2

Fig. 30 - ST_22_02_05_1

Fig. 31 - ST1_22_01_52_1

Fig. 32 - ST1_22_01_52_1

Fig. 33 - ST1_22_01_52_1

 


 

Appendix. Description of ceramic material

 

Excavation No. 1.

St_22_01_01

Unglazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of a ceramic item was found, presumably part of a lid, or part of a dastarkhan tabletop, made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a beige-brown tinge, with admixtures of small sand particles visible in the fractures. The surface of the fragment from the outer, front side is covered with a layer of light slip, a greenish-beige shade. On the inside, the surface is smooth, the walls are 2-1.6 cm thick, outside the wall is decorated with a stamp of a roughly square shape, with slightly oval edges; the stamp consists of four small squares, inside which are slanting straight lines forming a rhombus, with a cross inside (Figure 1).

Figure 1. St_22_01_01_1

A fragment of a molded ceramic item was found, presumably part of the leg of a figurine, made of well-mixed dense clay, light red with an orange-beige shade. The surface is not covered with slip and is rough. The fragment is oval in cross-section, tapering downwards, dimensions - 3.7x3.2 cm, cross-section - 1.4x1.8 cm (Figure 2).

Figure 2. St_22_01_01_2

 

 

Glazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of the rim of a large bowl, presumably a lagan, was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, light red with a yellowish tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the inside and partially from the outside is covered with a dense layer of dark green glaze, on a light slip background; inside there is also an underglaze scratched ornament in the form of alternating hook-shaped slanting lines and concentric straight lines forming a belt along the rim. The rim has a groove pressed from the inside running all along the circumference; the edges are oval in cross-section, the diameter is difficult to specify, the walls in the upper part are slightly thicker, narrowing downwards. The wall thickness is 0.5-0.7 cm (Figure 3).

 

Figure 3. St_22_01_01_3

There is also a fragment of a wall, presumably the bottom part of a piala bowl, made of well-mixed dense clay, light red with a yellowish tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the inside and outside is covered with a layer of green transparent glaze, on a light slip background; from the inside there is a scratched ornament in the form of alternating slightly curved, vertical lines. The wall is 0.6 cm thick (Figure 4).

 

Figure 4. St_22_01_01_4

 

St_22_01_02

Glazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of the rim of a large bowl, presumably a lagan, was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, light red with a greenish-beige tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the inside and partially from the outside is covered with dark green paint, on a light slip background, topped with a layer of transparent colourless glazed. Also, inside there is an underglaze scratched ornament in the form of a wavy horizontal line running along the bent edge of the rim. The rim has a pressed groove inside running all along the circumference; the edges are oval in cross-section, the diameter is 38 cm, the walls thicken downwards. The walls are 0.6-0.7 cm in thickness (Figure 5).

 

Figure 5. St_22_01_02_1

A fragment of the rim of a large bowl was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with some addition of small whitish particles visible in the fractures. The surface from the inside and partially from the outside is covered with dark green glaze on a light slip background; there is also a spot of yellow glaze on the inside of the fragment. Outside, just below the edge, there is a scratched horizontal wavy concentric line. The rim is straight, the edges are slightly bent outward in a flattened-oval cross-section, the diameter of the rim is 21 cm, the walls are 0.4-0.5 cm thick (Figure 6).

   

Figure 6. St_22_01_02_2

A fragment of the rim of a small bowl (piala) was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a yellow-beige tinge, with slight addition of small white particles visible in the fractures. The surface of the vessel is covered from the inside and partially from the outside with transparent yellow glaze on a light slip background; there is a slightly blurred strip along the edge of the rim made with transparent light green glaze. From the inside on the surface there is an underglaze scratched ornament in the form of ornate lines slightly inclined to the right. The rim has edges slightly bent outward with a flattened-oval cross-section; the diameter of the rim is 15 cm, the walls are 0.4-0.5 cm thick (Figure 7).

  

Figure 7. St_22_01_02_3

St_22_01_08

Unglazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of a ceramic lid for a vessel was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a yellow-beige tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the lid from the inside and outside is covered with a partially preserved layer of light slip. The lid slightly bends outward, there is a protrusion on the inside along the entire diameter; the edges of the lid are oval in cross-section, the diameter is 15 cm, the thickness is 0.6-1 cm, the walls grow thinner towards the centre (Figure 8).

  

Figure 8. St_22_01_08_1

Glazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of the rim of a bowl was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, light red with a yellowish tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the inside and partially from the outside is covered with a dense layer of green glaze, on a light slip background; also from the inside there is an underglaze scratched ornament in the form of ornate lines applied horizontally from the rim to the bottom of the vessel. The rim has a groove pressed from inside running all along the circumference; the edges are oval, the diameter is 30 cm, the walls thin downwards. The walls are 0.6-0.9 cm in thickness (Figure 9).

 

Figure 9. St_22_01_08_2

There were also two fragments of an open vessel, presumably a bowl; these are part of the tray and an upper part of the body, made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a light beige tinge. The surface of the fragments from the inside is covered with transparent colourless glaze on a light slip background; also from the inside there is an underglaze multicoloured ornament in black, blue and dark blue. The pattern is made in a plant-geometric style, in the form of curved intersecting wide lines forming segments with dots and spots inside. The tray is circular, with a diameter of 7 cm; the height of the tray is 0.6 cm, the wall thickness is 0.6-0.7 cm (Figure 10).

Figure 10. St_22_01_08_3, 4

 

St_22_01_10

Glazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of a tray from a bowl was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, light red with a yellowish-beige tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface from the inside and partially from the outside is covered with a layer of white slip. On the inside of the fragment, the slip is covered with a layer of pale yellow glaze; also on the inside there is a multicoloured ornament in brown, light green and red brick; the ornament is made in a plant-geometric style and consists of straight lines forming wide intersecting paths, and small alternating dashes. The diameter of the tray is 10 cm, the height of the tray is 0.8 cm, the walls of the vessel are 0.6-0.9 cm thick (Figure 11).

Figure 11. St_22_01_10_1

 

St_22_01_12

Unglazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of a vessel rim was found, presumably part of the neck of a jug, made of well-mixed dense clay, red with an orange-beige tinge, with insignificant addition of fine particles of sand and small inclusions of white colour. The surface of the fragment from the outside is covered with a partially preserved layer of barely noticeable light slip. The rim is slightly narrowed inward, in cross-section the edges are a flattened oval shape, the diameter is 7 cm, the walls of the neck thicken, 0.3-0.8 cm in thickness (Figure 12).

Figure 12. St_22_01_12_1

A fragment of the rim of a vessel was found, presumably a pot, made of medium-mixed dense red clay, with multiple admixtures of small and large sand particles visible in the fracture, as well as inclusions of minerals. The surface of the fragment is not covered with slip, the edges of the rim are bent outward, oval in cross-section; just below the bend of the rim there is a protruding concentric line running all along the circumference. The diameter of the rim is 20 cm, the wall thickness is 0.5-0.7 cm (Figure 13).

Figure 13. St_22_01_12_2

A fragment of the rim of a vessel was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a light beige tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the outside and inside is covered with light slip, on top of which there is a layer of dark slip on the outside partially preserved as spots. The edges of the rim are bent outwards, forming a straight horizontal platform 1.6 cm wide, roughly rectangular in cross-section; the diameter of the rim is 23 cm, the wall thickness is 0.6-0.7 cm (Figure 14).

Figure 14. St_22_01_12_3

Three fragments of one vessel, presumably a cauldron, were found; the vessel is made of medium-mixed dense grey clay, with multiple admixtures of small and large sand particles and inclusions of white colour visible in the fracture. The surface of the vessel from the outside and inside is covered with a layer of thinner light grey clay. The rim has a thickened edge, oval in cross-section; also along the edge there is a horizontal platform with two rows of concentric lines pressed on it. The diameter of the rim is 7 cm on the inside and 19.2 cm on the outside, the thickness of the platform is 2.7 cm, the thickness of the vessel walls is 0.4 cm (Figure 15).

Figure 15. St_22_01_12_4, 5, 6

Two fragments of the walls of a moulded vessel were also found; they are made of medium-mixed dense grey clay, with multiple admixtures of small and large sand particles and inclusions of white colour visible in the fracture. The surface of the vessel from the outside is covered with a layer of thinner light grey clay. On the outer side of the fragments there is an ornament in the form of a concentric line consisting of alternating pressed dents inclined to the right. The thickness of the vessel walls is 0.4 cm (Figure 16).

 

Figure 16. St_22_01_12_7, 8

A fragment of a bent handle from a jug was found, its upper part made of well-mixed dense red clay with minor admixtures of small sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment is covered with light slip; also on the outside along the back of the handle there are scratched vertical straight lines covering the entire surface. The handle is oval in cross-section, 3.5 cm wide, 1.7 cm thick (Figure 17).

Figure 17. St_22_01_12_9

 

St_22_01_13

Unglazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of a cauldron rim was found; it is made of medium-mixed dense red clay, with multiple admixtures of small and large sand particles and inclusions of white colour visible in the fracture. The rim with a pressed-in edge has a straight platform 1.2 cm wide; the diameter of the rim is approximately 23 cm; a moon-shaped vertical handle is attached to the side under the rim, its width is 1.4 cm. The body of the vessel swells immediately below the rim, the wall thickness is 0.3-0.4 cm (Figure 18).

 

Figure 18. St_22_01_13_1

A fragment of a rim from a narrow-necked jug and a part of a neck with a fragment of a loop-shaped handle attached to it were found. The fragment is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a pink-beige tinge. The surface from the outside and partially from the inside is covered with a partially preserved layer of red colour. The edges of the neck funnel slightly and are flattened-oval in cross-section; the diameter is 6 cm, the handle is attached to the edge of the rim and slightly rises above it; the handle is oval in cross-section, 1.6 cm wide, 1.1 cm thick (Figure 19).

Figure 19. St_22_01_13_2

A fragment of the rim of a vessel, presumably a jug, was found; it is made of medium-mixed dense red clay, with multiple admixtures of small and large sand particles and inclusions of minerals and white colour visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment is not covered with slip; a part of a loop-shaped handle is attached to the side of the rim; there are three dents located in one line at the place where the handle is attached to the rim. The edges of the rim are oval in cross-section, the handle is oval in cross-section, 2.9 cm wide, 1.9 cm thick (Figure 20).

Figure 20. St_22_01_13_3

A fragment of the sidewall of a vessel was found; this is a part of a shoulder made of well-mixed dense red clay, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles and small white particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the outside is covered with light slip; outside there is an applied roll that forms a concentric line running all along the circumference; just below there is a decorative element in the form of a depressed circle with a diameter of 1 cm, made probably with the help of a hollow tube. The thickness of the fragment wall is 0.5-1.6 cm (Figure 21).

Figure 21. St_22_01_13_4

There is also fragment of the wall of a moulded vessel, part of a shoulder, made of medium-mixed thin red clay, with multiple admixtures of small and large sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the outside is covered with light slip, on top of which there are red slip lines. On the outside of the fragment there is an ornament in the form of a belt consisting of paired lines scratched along the edges, between which there are alternating rounded dents. The wall thickness is 0.5-0.6 cm (Figure 22).

Figure 22. St_22_01_13_5

A fragment of a bent handle from a vessel, presumably a jug, was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with an orange-beige tinge. The surface of the fragment is covered with light slip, a yellowish-beige hue; there are also vertical straight lines scratched on the back of the handle, presumably made with a comb tool. The handle is oval in cross-section, 3.2 cm wide, 1.7 cm thick (Figure 23).

Figure 23. St_22_01_13_6

A fragment of a flat disc-shaped tray from a vessel was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with an orange-beige tinge. The surface of the fragment from the outside is covered with a dense layer of white slip; the tray slightly protrudes in a roughly rectangular cross-section; the diameter is 9 cm, the height of the tray is 1.3 cm, the thickness of the tray is 1.1 cm, the wall thickness is 0.6-0.9 cm (Figure 24).

Figure 24. St_22_01_13_7

 

St_22_01_15

Unglazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of the wall of a vessel was found; this is presumably a part of the body of a large jug made of well-mixed dense red clay, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles and inclusions of white particles visible in the fracture. The surface on the outside is covered with light slip; also on the outside there is a scratched ornament in the form of concentric straight and wavy lines made with a combed tool. The thickness of the walls is 1-1.1 cm (Figure 25).

Figure 25. St_22_01_15_1

A fragment of a flat bottom from a vessel was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a yellowish-beige tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles and inclusions of white colour visible in the fracture. The surface of the bottom from the outside is covered with a partially preserved layer of light slip. In the lower part of the bottom, from the outside, there is a protruding part in the form of a strip running all along the circumference; there is also a concentric protrusion on the inside of the bottom left by a potter's wheel. The diameter of the bottom is 12 cm, the thickness of the bottom is 0.5 cm in the central part and 1.4 cm at the edges, the thickness of the walls is 0.7 cm (Figure 26).

Figure 26. St_22_01_15_2

 

St_22_01_16

Unglazed whole and half-whole vessels.

An archaeologically whole trapezoidal vessel was discovered; this is a small tagara made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a green-beige tinge, with insignificant admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the vessel from the inside is not covered with slip, but has an ornament painted with slip dark brown colour. The pattern consists of two wide lines crossing in the central part of the bottom, with the edges slightly spreading onto the walls, dividing the bottom into four segments, inside of which spots or curls are made. Along the edge of the vessel, on the inside of the rim there is a wide horizontal line with drops of paint going down. The rim has a bent, with the edges bending outward, forming a flat platform 1.8 cm wide, on the surface of which there is a wavy line scratched with a comb-like tool, running all along the circumference; the rim edges are flattened-oval in cross-section. The diameter of the rim is 36.5 cm, the walls are straight, slightly narrowed in the central part, narrowing into a flattened bottom, the edges of which are smoothed into an oval shape. The diameter of the bottom is 24 cm, the thickness of the bottom is 1 cm, the thickness of the walls is 0.8-1 cm, the height of the vessel is 12 cm (Figure 27).

Figure 27. St_22_01_16_1

Unglazed ceramic fragments.

There is also a fragment of the rim of a vessel, presumably a small pot; it is made of medium-mixed dense red clay, with multiple admixtures of small and large sand particles and with numerous inclusions of white colour visible in the fracture. A partially preserved layer of red slip is visible on the surface along the rim edge. The rim  is thickened along the edge, with a straight platform slightly inclined inward, the width of which is 1.7 cm; the diameter of the rim is 17 cm on the outside, the wall thickness is 0.5-0.7 cm (Figure 28).

 

Figure 28. St_22_01_16_2

There is a fragment of a flat bottom from a vessel made of well-mixed dense grey clay with minor admixtures of fine sand particles. The surface from the outside is covered with a dense layer of light slip; the diameter of the bottom is 6 cm, the inner part of the bottom is oval, the thickness of the bottom is 0.6 cm, the thickness of the walls is 0.6-0.7 cm (Figure 29).

 

Figure 29. St_22_01_16_3

Glazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of a ceramic item was found, presumably part of the leg of a lamp, made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a green-beige tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture; it also has cracks and small cavities. The surface of the item is covered with a dense layer of dark blue glaze; the leg with a protrusion in the central part stands on a flat partially preserved platform, the edges are lost; the thickness of the base is 0.6 cm, the height of the leg from the base is 4.8 cm, the height of the extant part of the item is 5.4 cm (Figure 30).

 

Figure 30. St_22_01_16_4

 

St_22_01_17

Unglazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of a ceramic lid, a handle attached to the lid wall, was found; it is made of well-mixed dense red clay, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles and inclusions of white colour visible in the fracture. The surface of the handle and part of the lid are covered with thinner grey-beige clay; there are also traces of baking and soot. The handle is roughly rectangular in shape, with an oval edge, 3.6 cm high; where the handle is attached to the lid, there are two pressed-in areas on opposite sides for handling. The thickness of the lid wall is 1.3-1.4 cm (Figure 31).

Figure 31. St_22_01_17_1

 

St_22_01_18

Unglazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of a rim from a vessel was found, presumably a large hemispherical bowl, made of well-mixed dense red clay, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the outside and inside is covered with a layer of thinner clay the same colour as the item. The rim has an edge slightly bent outwards and is flattened-oval in cross-section; outside below the rim there is a protrusion in the form of a concentric step running all along the circumference. The diameter of the rim is 27 cm, the wall thickness is 0.7-0.9 cm (Figure 32).

Figure 32. St_22_01_18_1

A fragment of a rim from the vessel was found, the rim of the neck of a large water jug, with a part of a bent handle attached to the side. The fragment is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a green-beige, almost white tinge. The surface of the fragment is not covered with slip, or the slip coating has not been preserved; the neck is cylindrical, the edges are roughly rectangular in cross-section, the diameter is 10 cm. The handle rises slightly above the edge and is oval in cross-section, 4.2 cm wide, 1.8 cm thick (Figure 33).

Figure 33. St_22_01_18_2

There is also a fragment of a flat bottom from a small vessel, presumably a chirag, with a partially preserved loop-shaped handle attached to the side. The fragment is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with an orange-beige tinge; the surface is either not covered with slip or the slip has not been preserved. The bottom is flat, its diameter is 6 cm, the thickness of the bottom is 0.5 cm, the thickness of the vessel walls is 0.4-0.5 cm; a loop-shaped handle, oval in cross-section, 1.3 cm wide, 0.9 cm thick, is attached to the side just above the bottom (Figure 34).

Figure 34. St_22_01_18_3

A fragment of the edge of a flat lid was found; it is made of medium-mixed dense clay, red with an orange tinge, with admixtures of fine sand particles and inclusions of white colour visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the front is covered with a layer of thinner clay the same colour as the item. The edges of the lid are thickened with a slightly raised edge, roughly rectangular in cross-section; the diameter of the lid is 20 cm; outside, there is also a protrusion on the edge of the lid running all along the circumference; it has the form of a wide applied strip. The thickness of the lid walls is 0.8-1 cm (Figure 35).

Figure 35. St_22_01_18_4

A fragment of an applied handle for a lid was found; it is made of medium-mixed dense clay, red with an orange tinge, with admixtures of fine sand particles and inclusions of white colour visible in the fracture. The surface of the handle is not covered with slip, or the slip coating has not been preserved; the handle is cylindrical in shape, with a top pressed inside; the edges slightly protrude. The height of the handle is 1.9 cm, the diameter of the top is 4 cm, the diameter of the depressed circle inside the pommel is 2.6 cm, the wall thickness of the lid is 1.1 cm (Figure 36).

Figure 36. St_22_01_18_5

 

St_22_01_20

Unglazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of a bent handle from a vessel was found, its lower part attached to the wall; it is made of medium-mixed dense clay, red with an orange-beige tinge, with multiple admixtures of small and large sand particles visible in the fracture, as well as inclusions of white colour. The surface of the fragment is covered from the outside with partially preserved light slip, on top of which there are red slip drops barely visible along the back of the handle and where the handle is attached to the body. On the side of the handle there is an applied strip, on the surface of which there are slanting pressed-in alternating lines. The handle is oval in cross-section, 3 cm wide, 1.7 cm thick, the wall thickness is 0.7-0.9 cm (Figure 37).

Figure 37. St_22_01_20_1

There is also a fragment of a ceramic moulded item, presumably part of a large thick-walled, flat lid, made of medium-mixed dense clay, red with an orange-beige tinge, with multiple admixtures of small and large sand particles visible in the fracture, as well as inclusions of white colour. The surface of the fragment from the outside is covered with a partially preserved layer of light slip; also on the outside the surface is decorated with a scratched ornament made in a floral style, in the form of curls and twisted lines, bordered by a straight concentric line along the edge of the lid. The edges of the lid are roughly rectangular in cross-section; from the edge to the central part, the walls are noticeably thickened, the lower part is flat. The diameter of the lid is 37 cm, the thickness of the edge is 0.9 cm, the thickness of the central part is 2.9 cm (Figure 38).

 

Figure 38. St_22_01_20_2

 

St_22_01_22

Unglazed whole and half-whole vessels.

An archaeologically whole small bowl was found; it is hemispherical in shape and made of well-mixed dense red clay, with multiple admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture, as well as large and small inclusions of white. The surface of the bowl from the inside and outside is covered with a layer of thinner clay, slightly darker than the vessel colour. The rim with a straight edge is flattened-oval in cross-section, its diameter is 16 cm; the walls thin to a flat bottom, which has a diameter of 6.2 cm; the thickness of the bottom is 0.8 cm; there are concentric circles on the inside of the bottom. The height of the vessel is 4.4 cm (Figure 39).

Figure 39. St_22_01_22_1

A fragment of the rim of a vessel, presumably a pot, was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a greyish-yellow tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the outside is covered with light slip, on top of which there is a strip of dark, almost black slip running along the edge of the ring, all along the circumference. The rim with a thickened edge forms a flat area 2 cm wide, the edges are roughly rectangular in cross-section, the diameter of the rim is 27 cm, the wall thickness is 0.6 cm (Figure 40).

Figure 40. St_22_01_22_2

 

St_22_01_28

Glazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of the side of a large vessel, presumably its bottom part, was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a pink-beige tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface on the inside is covered with transparent colourless glaze on brown slip; from the inside there is also an underglaze multicoloured ornament in black, green and white. The pattern is made in a geometric style, in the form of wide lines, on top of which there are alternating dots, as well as small spots forming lines. The wall thickness is 0.7-1 cm (Figure 41).

Figure 41. St_22_01_28_1

 

St_22_01_29

Unglazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of the rim of a vessel, presumably a small pot, was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a yellow-beige tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the outside is covered with a layer of dense slip, light, almost white colour. The rim has a low gently sloping neck, the edges are flattened-oval in cross-section; the diameter of the rim is 8 cm; there are pressed-in concentric lines on the inside of the neck, running in two rows all along the circumference. The thickness of the vessel walls is 0.7 cm (Figure 42).

 

Figure 42. St_22_01_29_1

There is a fragment of the rim of a vessel, presumably a pot; it is made of well-mixed dense red clay, with minor admixtures of small sand particles visible in the fracture, as well as with numerous small inclusions of white colour. A partially preserved layer of red slip is visible on the surface along the rim edge. The rim is thickened along the edge, with a straight platform slightly inclined inward, the width of which is 1.7 cm; the diameter of the rim is 26 cm on the outside, the wall thickness is 0.7-1.0 cm (Figure 43).

 

Figure 43. St_22_01_29_2

There is also a fragment of a rim from a narrow-necked jug (kumgan?), a part of a neck with a fragment of a loop-shaped handle attached to it. The fragment is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a pink-beige tinge. The surface from the outside and partially from the inside is covered with a partially preserved layer of light colour. The edges of the neck with funnel slightly and are flattened-oval shape in cross-section; also, a little below the rim, the neck is slightly curved outward. The diameter of the rim is 3 cm; the handle is attached to the neck in the upper part and well above the rim line; in cross-section the handle is oval, 2.1 cm wide, 1.1 cm thick; there are pressed-in vertical lines on the back of the handle (Figure 44).

 

Figure 44. St_22_01_29_3

 

Excavation No. 2.

St_22_02_01

Unglazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of a flat bottom from a vessel was found; it is made of well-mixed dense red clay, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles and inclusions of minerals visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment is not covered with slip, outside the bottom there is a protrusion trapezoidal in cross-section, as well as a concentric line running all along the circumference. The diameter of the bottom is 10 cm, the thickness of the bottom is 0.7 cm, the thickness of the walls is 0.6-0.9 cm (Figure 45).

Figure 45. St_22_02_01_1

Glazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of the wall of a vessel was found; it is made of well-mixed dense red clay, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles and inclusions of minerals visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the inside is covered with transparent colourless glaze on a white slip background; also from the inside there is an underglaze scratched ornament in a floral style; there are also spots of yellow and green glaze on the surface. The wall thickness is 0.7-0.8 cm; the outside of the fragment is also covered with yellowish transparent glaze; there is no ornamentation (Figure 46).

Figure 46. St_22_02_01_2

 

St_22_02_05

Unglazed ceramic fragments.

A fragment of the rim of a vessel was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with an orange-beige tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles and inclusions of minerals visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the outer and inner sides is covered with a partially preserved layer of slip, pale orange hue. The rim of the vessel is thickened, narrowing inwards; there are two scratched lines along the edge of the rim; the diameter of the rim is 16 cm on the inside, the wall thickness is 0.6 cm (Figure 47).

Figure 47. St_22_02_05_1

A fragment of the side of a vessel was found; it is made of well-mixed dense clay, red with a brown-beige tinge, with minor admixtures of fine sand particles and inclusions of minerals visible in the fracture. The surface of the fragment from the inside is covered with transparent colourless glaze on a white slip background; also from the inside there is an underglaze scratched ornament in a plant-geometric style, in the form of a straight horizontal line and slightly inclined alternating lines below. There are spots and blurred lines of yellow and green glaze on the surface; the wall thickness is 0.7-0.8 cm, the outside of the fragment is also covered with transparent yellowish glaze; there is no ornamentation (Figure 48).

Figure 48. St_22_02_05_2

 

Tables

 

Table No. 1. Unglazed fragments of vessels. Rims.

1) St_22_01_12_2, 2) St_22_01_29_1, 3) St_22_01_16_2, 4) St_22_02_05_1, 5) St_22_01_12_1, 6) St_22_01_12_3, 7) St_22_01_29_3, 8) St_22_01_13_1, 9) St_22_01_29_2, 10) St_22_01_18_1, 11) St_22_01_13_3, 12) St_22_01_13_2, 13) St_22_01_18_2, 14) St_22_01_22_2, 15) St_22_01_12_4,5,6

 

Table No. 2. Unglazed fragments of vessels. Miscellaneous.

1) St_22_02_01_1, 2) St_22_01_08_1, 3) St_22_01_17_1, 4) St_22_01_12_9, 5) St_22_01_13_6, 6) St_22_01_01_1, 7) St_22_01_01_2, 8) St_22_01_18_3, 9) St_22_01_15_1, 10) St_22_01_13_5, 11) St_22_01_13_4, 12) St_22_01_18_4, 13) St_22_01_15_2, 14) St_22_01_16_3, 15) St_22_01_18_5, 16) St_22_01_13_7, 17) St_22_01_12_7,8, 18) St_22_01_20_1, 19) St_22_01_20_2

 

Table No. 3. Glazed fragments of vessels. Miscellaneous.

1) St_22_01_08_2, 2) St_22_01_02_2, 3) St_22_01_02_1, 4) St_22_01_10_1, 5) St_22_01_01_3, 6-7) St_22_01_08_3,4, 8) St_22_02_05_2, 9) St_22_01_01_4, 10) St_22_02_01_2, 11) St_22_01_16_4, 12) St_22_01_28_1, 13) St_22_01_02_3

Table No. 4. Unglazed whole or half-whole vessels.

1) St_22_01_16_1, 2) St_22_01_22_1


 

Appendix. Drawings

Figure 1 – Site location. General scheme. Satellite background

Figure 2 – Site location. General scheme. Topography background

Figure 3 – Site location. General scheme. Cartographic background

Figure 4 – Location of the excavation areas and petroglyph areas.
General scheme. Satellite background

Figure 5 – Location of the excavation areas and petroglyph areas.
General scheme. Topography background

Figure 6 – ST_1 excavation. General plan – grave numbers. Orthophoto background

Figure 7 – ST_1 excavation. General plan – grave numbers

Figure 8 – ST_1 excavation. Cross section north-south

Figure 9 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #1

Figure 10 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #2

Figure 11 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #3

Figure 12 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #4

Figure 13 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #5

Figure 14 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #6

Figure 15 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #7

Figure 16 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #8

Figure 17 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #9

Figure 18 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #10

Figure 19 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #11

Figure 20 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #12

Figure 21 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #13

Figure 22 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #14

Figure 23 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #15

Figure 24 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #16

Figure 25 – ST_1 excavation. Grave #17

Figure 26 – ST_1 excavation. Graves cross sections. Grave #2, 3, 5, 7

Figure 27 – ST_1 excavation. Graves cross sections. Grave #8, 9 11, 13

Figure 28 – ST_1 excavation. Graves cross sections. Grave #15, 17

Figure 29 – ST_1 excavation. Stratigraphy – south profile. East section

Figure 30 – ST_1 excavation. Stratigraphy – south profile. Central section

Figure 31 – ST_1 excavation. Stratigraphy – south profile. West section

Figure 32 – ST excavations. General scheme

Figure 33 – ST excavation #1. Plan

Figure 34 – ST excavation #1. Stratigraphy – west, east profiles

Figure 35 – ST excavation #1. Stratigraphy – north, south profiles

Figure 36 – ST excavation #2. Plan

Figure 37 – ST excavation #3. Plan

Figure 38 – ST excavation #3. Walls profiles

 
 

 FIELD REPORT ON THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS AT SULEIMAN-TEPA_1 SITE IN 2023

 

Introduction

Sponsor: Society for the Exploration of EurAsia (Switzerland).
Performers: International Institute for Central Asian Studies (IICAS) in cooperation with the Samarkand Archaeological Institute named after Ya. Gulyamov.
Excavations at the monastic cemetery in the Sulayman Tepa site (Sufiyan district) south of Urgut, Uzbekistan entered a second season and were conducted between September 4-18, 2023. This collaborative effort was under the executive directorship of Dr. Dmitry Voyakin between the International Institute for Central Asian Studies (UNESCO) and the Ya. Gulyamov Samarkand Archaeological Institute under the acting director, Dr. Muminkhon Saidov, and underwritten by the Society for the Exploration of Eurasia (Bern, Switzerland) directed by Dr. Christoph Baumer.
A team of international archaeologists and other specialists from Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, South Korea, and the USA expanded excavations at this cemetery which had been discovered the previous year in which the IICAS team confirmed the existence of a monastic cemetery in association with the nearby monastery dating as early as the 9th century AD. The 2022 excavations revealed 17 graves, all adult male, in a cemetery approximately 350 m south of the monastic church building first discovered and identified by the East Sogdian Archaeological Expedition led by Alexei Savchenko from 1999-2004. It also affirmed Savchenko’s findings with an exploratory trench to the south of the previous monastery site which revealed more cultural material which included pottery with ecclesiastical Christian symbols. In addition, the cultural layers and possible stone pavement and/or retaining wall found in this southern direction demonstrated that the monastic complex is still not fully revealed.


Objectives and methodology
The purpose of the 2023 excavation had the primary objective of gaining a better understanding cemetery's size. The team has assumed that this cemetery, if utilized for 5 centuries, could conceivably be quite large. The 2022 season excavated an area 23 x 8 m with human bone samples providing a radiocarbon (C-14) date to the 9th-10th centuries (see 2022 Field Report, pp. 88-90). It could, thus, be surmised that the site of the 2022 excavations was only a portion of the cemetery's entirety. This season's excavations were limited to only 2 weeks (15 dig days).
The team's objectives were as follows:
  1. Continue to trace the extent and boundaries of the Christian monastic cemetery located approximately 350 m south of the known monastic complex at Sulayman Tepa.
  2. Excavate and analyze any grave structures and osteological remains discovered on the site.
  3. Conduct topographic and analytical surveys of the cemetery and surrounding hillside.
  4. Process discovered cultural materials and provide a written field report.

The team employed the assistance from a crew of approximately 10-12 technical diggers local to the Sufiyan district who assisted throughout the operations. Excavations were conducted utilizing shovels, trowels, brushes, and hand tools. Loose soil was cleared utilizing a mechanical blower in situations in which no artifacts or human remains are present to prevent any advertent disturbance.
Once human remains were identified, care was taken to use small dental and wooden sculpting tools to reveal the skeletal structure. The remains were meticulously observed in situ with resulting recordation including photographs and 3-D photogrammetry, field measurements were taken, and the bones were then removed, wrapped, and packed according to anatomical groupings for later laboratory analysis. Soil samples were taken within selected graves' soil matrices for possible future analysis of carpology and other organic studies.
Geodetic work was conducted using a Trimble R3 GNSS receiver and a Leica TCR 407 laser total station which enabled the team to develop a topographic model. Such instrumentation provides highly accurate readings of both GPS coordinates for any finds as well as measurement of meters above sea level (m. asl.) for both the graves and skeletal remains. Initial skeletal observations are detailed below, and later subsequent laboratory osteological studies will continue to shed insight on any pathology and environmental impact from the period under study. Cultural material finds were photographed, and pottery fragments were drawn and described within the report. Grave construction-in which this season's excavations revealed two different types indicating possible phasing-was also carefully recorded and photographed.


Summary of Results
An initial 14.2 x 5 m trench (71 m2) was excavated and divided into three units or trenches (B1-B3) due south (or up the mountain slope) from the 2022 excavation trench. This section of excavations—both from the previous season and the current season—is designated Sulayman Tepa-1 (ST-1). It incorporates the previous 23 x 8 m trench (Unit A, 184 m2) with the current excavation (255 m2). However, on the second day of excavations, one of the team’s archaeologists, discovered an area of recent construction with a cut into the mountainside 10 (EW) x 8.5 (N/S) m, located 69 m via direct line to the east of the current excavation area (ST-1) and 100 meters in a circular direction toward the east around the mountain’s curvature with the current dirt road. Within the cross-section of the revealed hillside, a grave with human remains was discovered.
Thus, excavations proceeded in both locations. The newly discovered ST-2 was excavated in the location of the revealed grave. In total, 3 graves were discovered in ST-1 and 4 in ST-2. In both excavation units, the graves contained the remains of adult males ranging in estimated ages from young adult (20+ years) to old adult (50+ years) at time of death. All graves had a west-to-east orientation with the head placed on the west side of the grave, the typical orientation for medieval Christian burials. As previous excavations revealed, each grave’s construction contained an entrance pit (dromos) ranging between 130 to 180 cm in depth with a burial chamber containing a domed roof. Once the body was interred the burial chamber was then enclosed with mudbricks containing 2-3 courses and 2-3 rows. One major difference in burial method was detected between the two locations, with the entrance pit, or dromos, positioned to the east of the interment chamber in ST-2 as opposed to the west side of the dromos in ST-1. This variation in construction suggests possible phasing.

The burials in ST-1 had previously been dated via radiocarbon dating to the 9th-10th centuries C.E., and a pottery find in one grave at this location confirmed this chronology. Thus, the newly discovered burials in ST-2 likely pre- or post-date those of ST-1 based on this variation. One 12th-13th century sherd of glazed ware pottery was discovered at the ST-2 location; however, this was in the topsoil, which may be an arbitrary find. One tomb in ST-2 revealed the first and only discovered grave good: Two small, very thin metal strips of silver were discovered, one 63 mm long with 8 mm widened, or flared ends. The other strip measured 34 mm with one widened end. Very small rivets or nails with 2 mm wide square nails were discovered on both pieces, two with small wood fragments attached. Wood fragments were also noted and obtained from the soil. It was noted that the smaller end on the 34 mm strip was made to intersect with the longer strip, thus potentially forming a cross, yet with another smaller end of the same size missing. These findings confirm the ecclesiastical connection with the monastery and suggest a very large cemetery exists along the curvature of the mountainside with more than one phase, supporting the 500-year existence of this Christian monastic community.

During excavations of the topsoil in Unit-3B, the most eastern trench of ST-1, disarticulated human remains were also discovered. In addition, another human bone (a tibia) was seen in the topsoil of the trench’s baulk to the west. The topsoil in this location is 3 to 4 times higher than normal based on both the previous season’s excavations and within the northern half of ST-1-B itself. The reason for this discrepancy is because some 15-20 years before (based on the size of the nearby fruit trees) agricultural work created a plateau in the mountainside that that is just 5 m south of ST-1-B. During that process the soil from the 10-meter-wide plateau was displaced to the north with a row of subsequently planted fruit trees. It is logical to assume that graves further south of the current trench were disturbed and probably covered by the work. This discovery means that graves extended between 5-15 meters up the mountain from the current excavations. Such discoveries provide a logical inference as to the known extent of the cemetery’s boundaries extending in a triangular shape 65.1 (NE/SW) x 75.8 (SW/NE) x 85 (N/SE) with a total area of just over 4000 m2 (See fig 1 below). It should not be assumed, however, that the entirety of the cemetery’s boundaries have been currently discerned, as further investigation will be necessary.
Additionally, as during the previous season, residents provided the team with additional human remains discovered in the process of housing construction which continues in the valley around this cemetery. Analysis of these bones indicated a minimum of 5 additional individuals. When combining identified disarticulated remains with excavation of 24 graves on site, 32 individuals have been recorded within this cemetery’s vicinity.
The following preliminary field report provides detailed descriptions of the excavation units and elements (i.e. features), their stratigraphy, discovered features of each discovered grave, artifact descriptions, photographs, drawings, and field forensics of human remains.


See Field Report on the Archaeological Excavations at Urgut-Suleiman Tepa, Uzbekistan in 2022 http://www.exploration-eurasia.com/inhalt_english/frameset_projekt_2022.html.

The results from Savchenko’s excavations are documented in numerous source (see Bibliography). Savchenko’s final report was recently completed, see Alexei Savchenko (2023), Roads and Kingdoms: Two Encounters with the Nazarenes beyond the River, Eastern Christian Studies, Vol. 32. (Brill: Leiden/Boston), 2-142.

 


Fig. 1. Top plan of monastic cemetery’s surmised boundaries and excavations sites ST-1 (red boundaries) and ST-2 (blue boundaries) Photo and schematic: Mikhail Gurulev



Excavations and Element Descriptions

Excavation at the necropolis (ST_1)

List of Element.

Element 65. Level
Element 66. Level
Element 67. Level
Element 68. Entrance Pit
Element 69. Soil anomaly
Element 70. Soil anomaly
Element 71. Soil anomaly
Element 72. Soil Anomaly
Element 73. Soil Anomaly
Element 74. Soil Anomaly
Element 75. Entrance Pit
Element 76. Mudbricks
Element 77. Burial Chamber
Element 78. Disarticulated Human Remains
Element 79. Disarticulated Human Remains
Element 80. Mudbricks
Element 81. Human Remains
Element 82. Burial Chamber
Element 83. Entrance pit
Element 84. Mudbricks
Element 85. Burial Chamber
Element 86. Human Remains
Element 87. Human Remains
Element 88. Pottery Fragment

As mentioned above, the 2023 excavations exposed a section of the monastic cemetery to the south of the initial field (ST-1) and opened a new field 65 m east/southeast designated as ST-2. This section provides unit and element descriptions from both these fields.
Archaeological features (i.e. elements) were identified during excavations which include by levels (in this case, arbitrary) as well as identified throughout Area B regardless of which sub-unit in which they were discovered. Also, since Area B is located within field ST-1, element numbers continued in consecutive numbers from the 2022 excavations. Thus, numbering of elements for ST-B began with E-65 (See table of elements on page 9). In an effort to provide clarity concerning specific elements of a grave and the skeletal remains, elements other than levels will be grouped according to the grave designation, which will be according to letters (i.e. Grave 18, Grave 19, etc.).

 

ST-1, Area B

This new excavation unit (Area B of ST-1) was laid out with a 2 m baulk to the N to separate ST-1A from the newly created ST-1B.  ST-1B was subdivided into 3 sections (units) with 50 cm baulks proceeding in a west to east direction and designated as B-1, B-2, B-3. (See Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 1-4, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 4-7).
The initially demarcated size for ST-1B was an 11 x 4 m unit placed due south of the 2022 excavation (23 x 8 m). Due to time limitations and without the assistance of mechanical excavation equipment, the entirety of Area B was excavated with shovels. Initial photographs were taken prior to humus and soil removal. The designations of each sub-unit proceeding B1 through B3 in an east-to-west orientation. Sub-unit B-1 measured 3.6 (E/W) x 4 (N/S) m with a 50 cm north-south baulk separating B-1 from B-2. Sub-unit B-2 measured 3.8 (E/W) x 4 (N/S) m with a 30 cm baulk B-2 from B-3.  Sub-unit B-3 was initially 2.65 (E/W) x 4 (N/S) m. Extensions were dug in each unit during the course of excavations based on the situational context and will be described below.

Area B was covered with a dense grass humus layer as characteristic of the entirety of the mountain slope that proceeded to the cliff face. [get from Urgut paper] The soil is a brownish-gray loam interspersed with a light, white clay and small shale inclusions. In certain larger sections of the soil, large gray shale deposits are characteristic in the soil. This is confirmed due to the nearby modern house construction that occurred between 2021-22 due north of the known cemetery, as an expansive shale deposit several meters across is observed in the cut.

Shale rock outcroppings can also be seen in the topsoil at various locations along the mountainside. However, while this makes the soil rocky in some locations, it is not characteristic for a majority of the mountainside at these elevations. Thus, the land is airable and modern agricultural work, particularly the planting of fruit trees and viticulture has occurred for the past several decades. In fact, the entire mountainside has terraces for this purpose. Further historical and geological investigation would be necessary to determine how long such terracing has been practiced, although historical sources do confirm viticulture in the valley and surrounding mountainsides and excavations at the monastery complex revealed a wine cellar, probably confirming that agriculture and terracing certainly occurred at least as far back as medieval times.

As with any mountainside excavations, the slope creates a challenge for excavators, not only in revealing archaeological features and cultural material, but also to determine levels and/or possible time phasing. As the mountain proceeds southward, the slope increases. Area B rests on an approximate 16 percent gradient. Thus, simple level measurements of grave depths will not provide the excavators with any information concerning time fluctuations. Simply put, a grave found further up the slope will naturally be at a higher elevation if the standard practice was to dig an interment chamber approximately 150 cm deep regardless of the passage of time. Therefore, any time differences over the probable lifespan of the 500-year history of the monastery and its cemetery can only be determined via other means than layers at specific depths, such as cultural finds or eventual radiocarbon (C-14) analysis. Thus, the reader should keep this in mind when noting level designations as recorded by theodolite levels.

The elements of Area B are best described based on the categories of arbitrary soil levels which extended across the entire Area; the soil anomalies—first thought to be possible grave pits; disarticulated human remains found in the topsoil of U-3B; and elements designating features within the 3 graves discovered in Area B (Graves 18, 19, and 20). (See Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 1-4, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 4-7).

Soil Levels
Element 65
Level

This element designated the level that proceeded across the entirety of Area B including the humus and soil of the top layer (8-10 cm in depth) and an arbitrary depth of approximately 20-30 cm below the surface (cmbs) that was cleared across all three sub-units. The hill slopes approximately 1.16 m in height over the 4 m to the south giving a slope gradient of 16.17 degrees. Initial levels were taken of the designated units, prior to the first pass: B-1: (3.6 E/W x 4 m N/S) SW: 1155.045; NW: 1153.885; NE: 1153.892; SE: 1155.155. B-2: (3.8 E/W x 4 N/S m SW: 1155.108; NW: 1153.739; NE: 1153.952; SE: 1155.356; B-3: (2.65 E/W x 4 N/S m) SW: 1155.338; NW: 1153.750; NE: 1153.925; SE: 1155.616 m. asl.
During the initial pass of lowering the soil, a small pottery fragment (common ware) was discovered in the topsoil layer of Unit B-2. [description?] No other features or cultural material was discovered across all three sub-units. Once this arbitrary level was reached, photographs and levels were taken, and the element was closed. B-1: SW: 1154.915; NW: 1153.825; NE: 1153.792; SE: 1154.955; B-2: SW: 1154.958; NW: 1153.709; NE: 1153.842; SE: 1155.056; B-3: SW: 1155.116; NW: 1153.735; NE: 1153.925; SE: 1155.217; C: 1154.327 m. asl.

Element 66
Level

This element designated an arbitrary level across the entirety of Area B resting immediately below E-65, the initial humus and topsoil layer. As excavations proceeded to the south, the depth increased as the excavation unit cut into the mountain slope. Thus, the initial level for E-66 began from the north side at approximately 6 cmbs to 33 cmbs on the south side, or in the direction of the mountain cliff. On the southwest side of B-1, the soil was became very dense, and hard. Eventually, it was determined that this soil was natural due to an increased amount of clay, as opposed to the softer loam characteristic in the rest of Area B. This hard soil began between the 20-30 cm below the surface level.

As excavations reached this 20-30 cmbs level, in both the southeast corners of both the B-1 and B-2 sub-units, what was initially thought to be features in the soil was seen in the corner of these baulks. These soil anomalies appeared to have an oval shape with an apparent boundary line (1-2 cm in width) which extended into the east baulk on the south side of B-1 and, in a similar fashion, the east baulk of B-2 on the south side. It was surmised at the time that these anomalies could be indication of entrance chambers (known in Russian terminology as a dromos) as discovered during the previous season’s excavations. Both sub-units, B-1 and B-2 were cleared of soil utilizing a mechanical blower to better discern these possible grave pits.

The decision was then made to close E-66 as an arbitrary level. B-1 and B-2 were swept and mechanically blown to better discern grave pits within the respective sub-units. Each of the sub-units (B-1 through B3) were then divided north and south creating small terraces since it was known that the lower side of the slope (i.e. north side) would possibly reveal graves at lower levels than those on the upward side of the slope. The levels below the surface that designated this element extended from 20 cm (on the north side) to 80 cm (on the south side) of the unit. Final photographs and total station levels were taken and this element was closed. B-1: SW: 1154.052; NW: 1153.749; NE: 1153.740; SE: 1154.073; C: 1153.869 m. asl. B-2: SW: 1153.911; NW: 1153.683; NE: 1153.709; SE: 1153.930; C: 1153.805 m. asl. B-3: SW: 1153.927; NW: 1153.657; NE: 1153.738; SE: 1153.956; C: 1153.734 m. asl.

Element 67
Level

This element designated the soil level across the entirety of Area B (units 1-3) in which the opening levels mark the start of the 3 graves that became discernable in the matrix. Opening levels, as recorded by the closing levels for E-66, reflect the slope in the soil with the southern side of the area lowered approximately 1.66 to 1.9 m in depth, whereas the northern side of the area ranged between 14 to 19 cm in depth below the daylight surface.
By the time excavations were initially cleared to this level, one grave (eventually designated Grave-19, see description below) was fully discernable. Grave-19 was seen with the cut of the entrance pit (E-75) together with the mudbricks (E-76) blocking the entrance chamber along with a small section of the burial chamber (E-77) also partially visible within the south baulk of U-B3.  It was determined to leave this section undisturbed until further possible graves could be discerned throughout Area B while lowering the soil and additional 20-30 to fully expose Grave-19 to the floor of the burial chamber providing unhindered access for a profile excavation of the grave. This similar excavation technique had been conducted the 2022 season with the skeletal remains in Grave-16 (E-63) which provides a complete visual understanding of the grave construction and interment process in profile.

At this stage of the excavation, several features were noted in the soil, particularly in the corners of the baulks for U-B1 and U-B2. These features seemed characteristic of grave entrance chambers (see descriptions of E-69 through E-74). However, because these features lacked clarity as to their boundaries and were not fully exposed to incorporate all the elements of known grave construction, it was determined to lower the soil matrix in 10 to 20 cm passes. All three units (B-1, B-2, B-3) were lowered and terraced from north to south into thirds over the course of excavations created small plateaus or steps of approximately 1.5 m in the hopes of identifying graves, in particular entrance pits or mudbrick.

While leaving U-B3 untouched due to identifying Grave 19 within the southern baulk, the decision was made to expand U-B1 and U-B2 by 1 meter to the south, again, with the purpose of locating possible graves that might have been in conjunction with the soil anomalies seen in these units, labeled as E-70 through E-73. Once these units and their extensions were lowered to the same level as U-B3 with no discernable graves, these elements were photographed and closed (see descriptions below).

At this point in the excavations, during the process of terracing across all three units by approximately 50 cm, very soft soil was detected at the edge of the northern baulk of UB-1 which clearly extended further north into the baulk (see E-82 description). Thus, the decision was made to expand U-B1 to the south to fully expose this grave which was given the designation Grave-18. At this point, all three elements of the grave—the entrance pit (E-68), mudbricks (E-80), and burial chamber (E-82) were clearly visible from the exposed surface. It should be noted that the entrance pit had been previously identified prior to the unit extension, as it appeared like the other soil anomalies discovered previously, thus so designated. However, E-68 was the only such anomaly or feature that proved to be in association with a grave, whereas E-69 through E-74, despite their grave-like characteristics yielded no graves, as the element descriptions below indicate.

As each of the various anomalies were investigated, the soil continued to be lowered over the course of excavations throughout Area B to the same level as Grave-18 which was logically assumed to be at the deepest possible levels for any graves on this north side of the unit. In addition, it was decided to extend U-B3 an additional 3 meters to the east as means of providing easier access to Grave-19. Thus, the previous levels of the topsoil and initial cultural layer (E-65) in this section was exposed. It was in this extension of U-B3 in the topsoil layer that a disarticulated human femur was discovered, and eventually, together with several other human bones scattered throughout this sector, yet with no obvious grave pit or cohesion. It was then surmised that these remains were disturbed remains as a result of agricultural activity from just a few decades prior (see E-78 and E-79 descriptions below).
Once the U-B3 extension was lowered to the same level as the rest of the unit, only south side of U-B-3 had an ~100 x 50 x 50 cm wide ledge extending to its east baulk. It was then determined to lower this ledge fully to the south. During this process, a human skull was inadvertently struck by a shovel. This find eventually revealed a grave (Grave-20) whose description is provided below. At no time prior to the discovery of this skull was the grave detected in the soil matrix less than 40 cm from the east baulk. Eventually, part of the remaining excavation pit and mudbricks were seen to the west of the skull with the grave’s burial chamber extending into the east baulk of the U-3B extension. It was then determined to excavate the burial chamber by burrowing into the baulk without further extension of the unit.
With the discovery of Graves-18,-19, and -20, it was surmised that more graves were to be found within Area B. As mentioned above, the soil anomalies found close to the baulks separating the various units (B1, B2, and B3) were likely graves. For that reason, further investigations, particularly that of E-72 underwent extensive investigation with the assumption that another grave was to be found. This did not prove the case. As soil was lowered throughout Units 1B and 2B, the previous anomalies dissipated or were determined to be from agricultural work. Therefore, it can be noted that the concentration of these burials further south of Unit A (2022) appeared to lessen.
Once it was determined that no further graves were noted in the excavation unit, final levels and closing photographs were taken. (See Photo Appendix, Fig. 29-30).

Soil Anomalies
Element 69
Soil anomaly

This feature was discerned in the northeast corner of U-B1 that appeared to extend into the east baulk separating B-1 and B-2, initially thought to be a grave entrance pit in association with E-68, which was an entrance pit for Grave 18. This later proved only to be an anomaly in the soil, perhaps from agriculture, or might have been soil disturbance at the upper levels for Grave 18 itself. Opening levels for this feature as initially observed were 1153.526 m. asl. Once it was noted that this element was no longer present, this feature was closed.

Element 70
            Soil anomaly

This feature was discerned in the southwest corner of U-B1, initially thought to be a possible grave whose features first manifested at a level of 1154.028 m. asl. As excavations continued and the soil, which was very hard in this section of U-B1, was filled with a large amount of whitish-gray clay. It later proved following lowering the soil only to be an anomaly with no connection to any grave or other cultural material, possibly because of agricultural activity. As the soil was lowered in this area a total of 1.41 m below the daylight surface, the feature was closed following final measurements and photographs.

Element 71
Soil anomaly

This feature was discerned in the southeast corner of U-B1, initially thought to be a possible grave, yet later proved only to be an anomaly in the soil whose features first manifested at a level of 1154.564 m. asl. Curiously, this feature even appeared to have a rectangular shape (~1 x 2 m with an E/W orientation) with a certain discoloration of the soil much like grave pits seen within the cemetery. As a result, excavations lowered the soil an additional 60 cm, however, at that point, no grave chamber proved evident. This element was closed following final photographs at a level of 1154.564 m. asl.

Element 72
Soil Anomaly

This feature was discerned in southeast sector of U-B2 that proceeded into the E baulk between UB-2 and UB-3. Initially thought to be a grave and excavated to a depth of more than 1 m below the exposed surface, but no grave was discovered.
Photos were taken of the assigned element prior to beginning excavations. Initially, the feature was suspected to be the entrance pit and excavations were begun by defining the borders of the feature. Soil was composed of the typical loam with small shale inclusions. The soil was uniformly hard with no major change in the soil. It was then decided to lower 2 m below the known medieval surface which seemed to extend to the known depth for burials throughout the cemetery. Once the level exceeded the possible levels for the entrance chamber in which the soil became softer and slightly darker in color with roots in the soil. It was then determined that whatever this anomaly is/was, no grave or other cultural material was discerned. Closing measurement and photographs were taken and the element was closed.

Element 73
Soil Anomaly

This feature was discerned in the corner of the southeast sector of U-B2 that proceeded into the E baulk between UB-2 and UB-3 and opened at a level of 1153.952 m. asl. Initially thought to be a possible grave chamber, yet after lowering the soil by approximately 80 additional centimeters, this proved only to be an anomaly in the soil, possibility from agricultural work. Closing measurements and photographs were taken and the element was closed.

Element 74
Soil Anomaly

This feature was first noted in the north-central sector of U-B2 with the element opened at a level of 1153.347 m. asl. Initially, thought to be a grave, yet after lowering the soil further, this proved only to be an anomaly in the soil, possibly from agricultural work. After continued lowering of the soil by a total of more than 65 cm no further features or cultural material was discerned. Closing measurements and photographs were taken and the element was closed.

Disarticulated Human Remains
Element 78
Disarticulated Human Remains

While clearing soil in the upper level (E-65) at the southern side of the U-B3 extension, still in the topsoil, a disarticulated adult-sized humerus was discovered in the fill. The soil was carefully examined and the findspot was noted and measured at the 1154.324 m. asl level. As more topsoil was removed, additional disarticulated and highly fractured bones (post-mortem fractures) were discovered slightly south of the original find, predominately from two locations. Element 78 marked the location of this first humerus bone and the surrounding location. The second location, which still had some bones left in the matrix yet not discovered in any anatomical fashion or order, were found more up the slope in the SE corner of U-B3 extension (see E-79 description).

Once these remains were discovered, hand troweling revealed additional disarticulated human remains which were gathered, labeled, and bagged. Following removal from the field, the bones were cleaned of excess dirt and examined. All the bones appear to come from the same individual with no “repeated” bones (this includes the bones discovered in E-79). The bones were highly fractured with significant taphonomic and postmortem damage, none of the appendicular bones had full distal or epiphysial ends intact. The inventory was as follows: 1 right radius, (16.7 cm), 1 right ulna, (13.5 cm), and 1 left humerus (12.5 cm), yet, as noted, with both distal and epiphysial ends missing. 3 phalange bones were found, specifically 2 proximal (4.2 cm; 3.4 cm) and 1 intermediate (2.6 cm) but side (right or left) could not be determined. Half of a femoral head (right?) was also found in the soil along with 6 small rib fragments and 10 sacrum fragments with much taphonomic damage. 4 skull fragments including parts of the orbits were also removed along with 10 very small unidentified fragments which were discovered in the fill after a careful examination of the loose soil.

Element 79
Disarticulated Human Remains

This element was discovered shortly after the initial exposure of the disarticulated adult-sized human remains found in E-78. These remains were to the north of E-78 by ___ cm. As with the remains in E-78, these bones had no specific anatomical order and had been severely fractured postmortem. The remains were carefully exposed via troweling and a total station level was taken along with photographs. The remains measured within the topsoil at 1154.977 m. asl. The variation in measurement between the level of E-78 and E-79 has to do with the rise in slope more than in the actual depth in relation to the topsoil. Also, the fact that none of the bones were anatomically identical as to type of bone, it can be surmised that all these bones in both E-78 and E-79 came from the same individual. The inventory of disarticulated bones were as follows: 1 left distal femur fragment (22.5 cm long as measured from the epiphysial condyle). 1 left femoral head (9 cm long), scarred by shovel strikes, but the shovel strikes did not fracture the bone. 1 right humerus with postmortem fractures, 24 cm long with what remains as both the epiphysial and distal ends are missing.  2 small rib fragments which were a single rib bifurcated in half with one 9.1 cm long and the other 6.2 cm long.

These bones are in the modern topsoil level likely because they had previously been disturbed at a location further up the mountain. In fact, approximately 3.5 m to the south of Area B is a terraced plateau that extends for 10 meters north to south around the slope of the mountain forming a type of road, probably created for agricultural purposes and to provide access for modern vehicles and equipment. Encircling the plateau on its north edge is a row of 10-15 fruit trees that appear to be approximately 10-15 years old (perhaps older). During the agricultural excavation of this plateau with modern equipment and while planting the trees, it is possible that human remains were discovered during this process. These bones were then either reinterred or just a part of the soil fill that was removed from this plateau area, whose cut extends approximately 10 meters into the mountainside. Additionally, what appeared to be a human bone was also found on the southwest corner in the baulk of U-B3 in the modern topsoil area. While this bone was left in place and not closely inspected, it appears human, specifically an adult-sized human tibia. This provides further evidence of disturbed graves and, most importantly, that the cemetery extended even further south from Area B, possibly by as much as 15 meters.

Also of note, within the topsoil of the U-B3 extension at almost the same level as these remains, a modern green glass bottle fragment was discovered quite close to E-79. This seems to confirm the disarticulated bone hypothesis concerning the grave disturbance to the south due to the agricultural work of previous years. Finally, the topsoil layer in this southern section across U-B is thicker, approximately 30-35 cm thick as opposed to the 8-10 cm layer of the soil to the north, or almost 4 times thicker than what has been recorded below, or north, of this section, demonstrating that soil was placed in this area during modern times.

Graves with Accompanying Human Remains
Each of the 3 graves revealed in Unit B of ST-1 contained 4 discernable elements: the entrance pit (on the easternmost side of the grave), a barrier of mudbricks (serving as a separator between the entrance and the burial chamber), the burial chamber (location of human remains), and the body itself. The graves are numbered according to the sequence of excavation beginning from the 2022 season, thus, U-B’s graves were labeled Grave-18, Grave-19, and Grave-20. The following element descriptions are grouped according to the graves in which they were identified and described based on their east-to-west layout: entrance pit, mudbricks, burial chamber, skeletal remains.

Grave-18
Element 68
Entrance Pit

This element was first identified on the far north side of excavation Unit B1 during a third pass while clearing of the soil as revealed in the level of E-67. A line in the soil was identified that extended for more than a meter almost parallel with the north baulk. The soil to the north of the line was extremely soft in comparison to the surrounding soil matrix. In addition, the cut of this chamber with the soil differentiation was also visible in the baulk itself. Once the soil was carefully cleared by a mechanical blower, this pit was easily discerned along with mudbrick due east of this pit, thus is was assumed that the newly discovered feature was the entrance pit for a grave. A level was taken with the total station (1153.486 m. asl) along with accompanying photographs.

Because the pit extended into the north baulk, the entirety of the north baulk for U-B1 was expanded north by 100 cm. This resulted in the full exposure of all elements of Grave-18. Additional photos, levels and measurements were taken once the whole grave complex was revealed. This element’s entrance pit measured 124 (E/W) x 75 (N/S) m, and as seen at this level were W: 1153.116; C: 1153.119; E: 1153.121 m. asl. However, this entrance pit extended slightly into the west baulk, probably by 10 cm, as seen within the west baulk, though the soil was never removed, making the original N/S boundaries 85-90 cm long. The boundaries of this entrance pit were originally dug quite exact in its rectangular shape and the bricked-up passage (E-80) was clearly revealed. The floor of the entrance pit as dug, however, was not meticulously flattened, with what appear to be gash marks from the digging tool, leaving small undulations in the pit’s base left behind by the grave diggers.
Once the entire grave was excavated, final levels were taken of the exposed entrance pit: W: 1152.815; C: 1152.764; E: 1152: 834 m. asl. This means that the depth of the interment pit extended a minimum of 72 cm and was likely 80 to 100 cm from the medieval surface in depth and 1.16 m from the modern surface. (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 8-14, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 4-7, 8).

Element 80
Mudbricks

This element designates the mudbricks demarcating the burial chamber (E-82) from the entrance pit (E-68) of Grave-18. The top bricks were first discovered in the soil following the expansion of U-B1 by 100 cm to the north and in association with the entrance pit. The top brick measured at 1153.132 m. asl. As excavations continued, 3 courses and 2 rows of bricks for a total of 6 were noted. The bricks had an average size of 23 x 21 x 8 cm.

However, once the burial chamber was excavated, 2 additional bricks were discovered that had collapsed onto the shoulder of the interred body, covering the entirety of the left clavicle and epiphysial side of the left humerus. It is even possible that these bricks collapsed at time of burial since the hole separating the entrance pit and burial chamber appeared fully closed; this, however, cannot be determined with absolute certainty. (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 8-14, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 4-7, 8).

Element 82
Burial Chamber

This element was first identified on the far north side of excavation Unit B1 during third pass while clearing of the soil as revealed in the level of E-67. A curved line soil was identified on the east side of U-B1 and due east of E-68 that extended for approximately 50 cm almost parallel with the north baulk. Initially, it was thought that this feature was what had previously been identified as E-69, that appeared at a slightly higher level and seemed to extend into the east baulk of U-B1. However, once the association between E-80 (entrance pit) and this element was noted, it was assigned a new element designation. The entire north baulk of U-B1 was extended by 100 cm, which fully exposed an oval shape in the soil along with the mudbrick feature (E-80) and the entrance pit. While this dome-shaped chamber (as throughout the cemetery) would have never been observable from the medieval surface, as revealed during the excavation, it measured 97 (E/W) x 70 (N/S) cm. As first revealed from the excavation unit’s surface by the total station the levels were as follows: W: 1153.134; C: 1153.145; E: 1153.151 m. asl.

 The soil was much softer than the surrounding matrix, thus, confirming as in the other graves in the cemetery, that the soil had been refilled into the chamber following the body’s interment. Following this initial exposure, excavations commenced using hand trowels to determine the burial chamber’s boundaries and reveal the skeletal remains. Excavations began on the east side so as we reveal the feet first since the chamber (as in all the other graves in the ST-1) had a chamber that narrowed to a point to include space for the legs. The soil was carefully examined for any cultural material, yet nothing was found. Once all the soil was removed and the skeletal remains exposed, measurements of the chamber as excavated were taken: Entire length: 167 cm; height from grave chamber floor to the exposed surface E: 13 cm; C: 89 cm; W: 44 cm. It should be noted, however, that the central height of the chamber was probably originally between 95-100 cm. Also of note were the visible digging tool marks along the sides of the burial chamber used when the grave was originally dug. While not as distinct as some of the chambers excavated in Unit A in 2020 due to the increasing hardness of the soil with its higher clay content, they were particularly noticeable on the upper levels of the chamber walls. (See Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 13-14, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 4-7).

Element 86
Human Remains

As the soil was removed from the burial chamber (E-82), eventually on the far east side of the chamber, an adult-sized skull was revealed. It was then determined to excavate the remains from the feet, or west side, since that end of the burial chamber was too difficult to access once the axial skeleton was exposed and, from just below the pelvic girdle extending to along the lower appendicular bones, the soil ceiling remained in place with the burial chamber narrowing to just 13 cm above the chamber floor.

The skeletal remains were large and robust with the body placed supine in the standard west-to-east orientation. As the remains were revealed utilizing small dental and wooden clay sculpting tools, it was noted that the left foot had been slightly twisted laterally which may indicate that body’s height exceeded the length of burial chamber. The skull was askance with the crown of the head facing south and the gaze toward the feet (east). It is possible that the head was displaced when the mudbricks (E-80) covering the burial chamber (E-82) collapsed, dislodging the original positioning of the head at burial. 

Taphonomic damage was noted on the axial skeleton, particularly the lower pelvic region and specifically the ischiopubic ramus along with the lumbar vertebrae and sacrum. The arms had been folded across the thoracic cavity, with left arm at sternum approximately 120-degree ancle above the right arm placed at 110-degree angle as measured in relation to the humerus. Cranial features strongly favor male. The left thoracic region also had severe taphonomic damage with 6 lower ribs detached from the posterior ribs. Mudbricks, used to close the burial chamber from the entrance pit appeared to have collapsed on the left clavicle and scapula. The skull may have been displaced due to the body’s length (155 cm in situ) since the burial chamber was slightly too small for the length of the remains. The remains appeared completely intact but for the displacement of some hand phalanges. (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 13-14, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 4-7, 8).

Careful examination of the remain in the skull and pelvic regions confirmed that the remains were male. Teeth ware suggests possible categorization of age at time of death as Middle Adult (35-50 yrs). No pathology or premortem injury were detected from the field examination. Teeth samples were taken from the upper and lower left premolars for possible future C-14 and/or aDNA analysis. Total station levels of the skeleton were as follows: Head: 1152.840; Pelvis: 1152.692 m. asl; the feet were inaccessible for measurement. Following final photographs, the bones were removed, cleared of excess soil, and packed according to procedure. The appendicular bones were measured and recorded. During this removal process, a possible piece of fabric was discovered on the posterior of the left ischium (pelvis). However, it was difficult to determine if this material is a very small root cluster or fabric. The sample was bagged for future laboratory investigation.

Grave-19
Element 75
Entrance Pit

During excavation of the arbitrary level E-67 as the south baulk of U-B3 was revealed, an entire grave complex (entrance pit, mudbricks, and burial chamber) became visible in the baulk. The initial excavation was prior to the U-B3 extension to the east, in part to reveal the entire grave more fully (see above). Element 75 identified the entrance pit, whose cut was clearly seen in the western side of the U-B3 baulk’s profile. The entrance pit lay 40 cm below the topsoil and eventually, the southeast section of the baulk was extended by an additional 2 (E/W) x 1 N/S m to completely reveal the entrance pit and discern its boundaries. The soil fill was removed to the base of the entrance pit’s floor which also revealed all of the mudbrick barrier (E-76) separating the entrance pit from the burial chamber (E-77). At the base of the bricks, but still above the entrance pit’s floor, a small pottery fragment of common ware was discovered (E-88). The entrance pit’s measurements were 140 (E/W) x 135 (N/S) and extended 185.5 cm below the modern surface and 145.5 cm below the probable medieval surface. Closing total station measurements: W: 1153.828; C: 1153.742;                 E: 1153.761 m. asl.

Element 76
Mudbricks

This element designates the mudbricks demarcating the burial chamber (E-77) from the entrance pit (E-75) of Grave-19. These bricks were first observed as a part of the entire grave complex (entrance pit, mudbricks, and burial chamber in the south baulk of U-B3. Once the soil fill to entrance pit E-75 and the burial chamber E-77 was removed, the entire cluster of bricks was discerned. While the brick cluster was somewhat amorphous in shape, it appeared to be in a triangular, pyramid shape 3 rows high, with three or four courses at the base. The bricks, due to detrital melt were difficult to tell if they had been variously sized when constructed, but appeared on average to measure 23 x 21 x 8 cm. The brick cluster’s maximum width measure 50 cm and was 40 cm high, to fill the hole originally dug to the east as the entrance to the burial chamber. On the burial chamber side, only 4 bricks were visible protruding from the chamber wall (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 1-4, 17, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 4-7, 9). The top brick measured at a level of 1154.092 m. asl. the base of the brick column was 1153.530 m. asl.

Element 77
Burial Chamber

This element designated the burial chamber for Grave 19. During excavation of the arbitrary level E-67 as the south baulk of U-B3 was revealed, an entire grave complex (entrance pit, mudbricks, and burial chamber) became visible in the baulk. The burial chamber’s looser soil was the most prominent as seen in the south baulk and appeared as a semi-circular shape in the southeast corner of the original unit, clearly revealed above the initial total station measurement of 1153.932 m. asl., however, the domed excavation of the burial chamber extended higher than that by approximately 30 cm. As measured from the modern surface, the top of the burial chamber was 168 cm deep, and from the cleared floor of the burial chamber, 209 cm deep (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 1-4, 17, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 4-7, 9). When considering the 40 cm between the modern topsoil and the probable medieval surface, the burial chamber’s floor was approximately 170 cm below the medieval surface.
Following initial exposure of the grave complex in the U-B3 south baulk profile, the soil was lowered further throughout the excavation unit, leaving a 40-50 cm ledge in front of the revealed grave and, as previously mentioned, U-B3 was extended to the east by 1 m. Once the excavation pit (E-75) was excavated, the 50 cm ledge was kept in place only in the area around the grave complex to act a stabilizer for the soil. The burial chamber was then excavated from its northern side to view the burial within the chamber via its profile.
As excavations commenced, the soil fill was seen to be a slightly darker brown with looser loam, but the color differentiation was probably due to the soil’s moisture. Small root systems were also noticeable throughout the chamber and the soil also had the usual pieces of shale pebbles throughout. An attempt was made to determine the chamber’s boundaries which were discovered on the floor’s northern edge; however, the ceiling was much more difficult to determine, and excavators struggled to tell the difference between the chamber’s ceiling and the natural soil. Eventually, it was discovered that the chamber’s ceiling at its peak was about 80 cm from the floor, thus, the ceiling was slightly overcut by the excavators by 20 cm on the north side of the chamber. It was noted that the chamber tapered down toward the east where the skeleton’s legs were placed. Care was taken while lowering the soil in the chamber so as not to dislodge any skeletal remains. Naturally disarticulated remains (foot and finger phalanges) were found at higher levels than the rest of the skeleton on the east side of the burial chamber. Also, while clearing the soil fill from E-77, a disarticulated part of the left condylar process for an adult-sized mandible was found along the south wall of the burial chamber, which was later found to be in association with the skeleton. Also, in the soil fill at the south/southeast side of the chamber a small potsherd with similar fabric and color to the fragment (E-88) found in the entrance pit (E-75) was found. These items were bagged and labeled.
Eventually, the entire skeleton was revealed (see E-87 description) once all the soil fill was removed. The burial chamber was measured, 200 (E/W) x 130 (N/S) cm. The east side foot extension’s ceiling measured 29 cm high. The body itself was placed along with south side of the tomb, with the chamber extending to the north as a semi-circle. The inference here is that the tomb was intentionally dug with room to the north for the grave digger to fit within the chamber as he continued to complete the domed chamber. This also enabled a person to guide the body into place through the entrance pit and the hole separating the pit from the burial chamber and arranged the deceased according to accepted burial practice. Final total station levels measured as follows: W: 1153.531; C: 1153.524; E: 1153.530 m. asl. (The east coordinates were not at the exact position of the feet as this area was inaccessible.)

Element 87
Human Remains

This element designated the adult human remains discovered within Grave-19 and specifically, burial chamber E-77. Initial excavations of the soil within the chamber revealed disarticulated extremities, specifically feet and finger phalanges. Along with south wall of the chamber part of the left condylar process for an adult-sized mandible was also found and later verified to be a mandibular fragment from the remains. Thus, natural processes (i.e. rodents/roots) displaced some of these bone fragments, yet it also suggests that the head position—which revealed the deceased facing north, with the mandible slightly askance to the south over the cervical vertebrae—is not the original position of the head at time of burial.
Excavation of the fully intact remains began with the discovery of the skull. The soil was lowered to just above rest of the remains. At this point, the epiphyseal side of the humerus bones were revealed. It was then decided, for ease of access and minimizing disruption, to excavate the remains from the feet to the head.
The interred was placed supine in the usual west-to-east orientation. The arms were placed across upper abdomen at 45-degree angles with the left arm just above right. While the bone structure was somewhat slight, the pelvic indicators suggest male, with no sharp medial aspect to the ischiopubic ramus. The skull features were less pronounced, but the rectangular-shaped orbits and blunt orbital rims also affirm the interred as a male. On the right thoracic side, rib numbers 3 and 4 appear to have had a pre-mortem break that were fully healed at time of death.
While further examination is needed, the remains suggest, based on dentition, that this person was either a Middle Adult (35-50 yrs) or Old Adult (50+) upon time of death. Since most of his adult teeth are intact, with molar ridges less worn, it is more likely this person died prior to 50 years of age. The lower right premolars 1 and 2 were extracted for potential C-14 and aDNA analysis. Final total station measurements could only access the skull and thoracic levels since the feet were inaccessible by the equipment. Skull: 1153.761; Thoracic: 1153.624 m. asl. Besides the pottery fragment found within the soil on the south side of the grave chamber, no other cultural material or grave good was discovered on or around the remains.

Element 88
Pottery Fragment

This element designated a pottery fragment discovered near the floor of the entrance pit (E-75) of Grave-19. This pottery fragment was designated its own element number due to its discovery in situ at the base of the mudbricks (E-76) to Grave-19. The find spot was measured with a total station: 1153.860 m. asl. The sherd is from a common ware pot or bowl made of a grayish-red clay. Field examination dates the fragment between the 9th-11th centuries (AD). This date would further affirm the radiocarbon dating of skeletal remains discovered in Area A of ST-1 in 2022, which were attributed to the 9th-10th centuries (see 2022 Field Report, pp. 88-90.) Another pottery fragment was also discovered in the soil fill on the south side of burial chamber E-77, this fragment was similar in both fabric and thickness and may have come from the same vessel, though this is still to be determined. In total, 4 potsherds were discovered throughout U-B, with two in the topsoil layer, thus classified as non-diagnostic surface finds.

These remains were left in place to be viewed by attendees of the 7th Salzburg Conference on East Syriac Christianity in Central Asia and China. The remains were subsequently removed from the grave and handled according to procedure.

Grave-20
Element 81
Human Remains

Once the U-B3 extension by 100 cm to the east was completed, the floor of the unit was lowered in successive increments. In the southeast sector of the extension, due east/ northeast of Grave-19, the soil was lowered to the same level as the original unit. During this process, a human skull was struck by a shovel, creating significant damage in what was eventually determined to be the right occipital and temporal bone. Excavations were immediately halted, and the soil was cleared with the skull fragments gathered, labeled and bagged.

The exact placement of the skull proved initially confusing, since the skull was obviously not in a supine position. In addition, no other remains were immediately discovered in the vicinity. Additionally, the previous interment chamber or entrance pit had not been seen in the soil. The element was immediately assigned a number (E-81) and a total station level and coordinate were taken: 1153.657 m. asl. The discovery was measured at approximately 120 cm from the probable medieval surface and 150 cm from the modern daylight surface. (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 1-4, 21-26, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 4-7, 10). 

The grave appeared to extend into the east baulk and the only way the bones could be fully accessed was to cut into the baulk. For investigative purposes, it was determined to burrow into the burial chamber. Initially it was thought the skull’s size might be that of a sub-adult, but this was only due to the abnormal positioning of the skull. At this point in the excavation, the U-B3 extension was leveled to match the entire unit, except for 70 cm to the south where the known graves (19 and now, 20) were identified.

Once the area was fully prepared and initial photographs were taken, excavations on the remains commenced, first in and around the skull. At this point, a parallel line of mudbricks (2 row and 2 courses) were found (see E-84 description). It was also determined that most of the entrance pit (E-83), which was eventually revealed to the east of the mudbricks, had been destroyed during the initial excavations.

The skull at this point in the excavation was confirmed to be in a prone position, with the skull’s coronal suture, or superior side, facing south with the eyes facing downward, or inferiorly, with the parietal lobe in a dorsal position. Once the skull, bricks, and entrance pit were partially exposed through this investigation, it was determined to remove all the soil fill for the remainder of the burial chamber (E-85) as seen in the east baulk. This was for the purpose of accessing the lower extremities on the east side of the tomb first during the excavation process so as not to disturb or damage the rest of the skeletal remains.
This excavation required significant effort as the soil was removed, having to excavate while the excavator lay on his side during the entire process. Once the upper sections of the burial chamber’s soil were removed, the first part of the skeleton to be revealed was the left posterior femur and pelvis. This was then left untouched as efforts continued to discover the end of the tomb and expose the extremities and lower appendicular skeleton.
Gradually, the entire skeleton was exposed, with the body confirmed as being in a prone position, or on its anterior side. The right pelvis appeared strangely displaced with the superior side flipped inferiorly. Such displacement seems to have occurred postmortem since it was anatomically impossible pre-mortem unless this related to cause of death. If there was grave disturbance, however, the rest of the body, other than the skull, did not appear to have been affected. Additionally, nothing in or around the burial chamber suggested forced entrance into the tomb. Also, displacement due to natural forces, such as roots or rodents, seems unlikely given the size of the bone displaced (entire right pelvis) and the uniform way it lay on the remains. Other features on the remains were also curious but require closer forensic analysis. For example, the lumbar vertebrae seem somewhat unusual (additional facets or unfused?). The vertebral column seems curved (possible scoliosis?) with the curve in spine extended to the left side of the body.

Final soil clearance in and around the skull revealed a disarticulated C-3 vertebra to the southwest of the skull by 35 cm. The mandible was laying laterally just to the west of the left scapula and south of the C-4 vertebra, thus the C-4 and the mandible were on top of the posterior side of the body with its inferior side up and in a location that suggests that it had been placed separately on the anterior side of the left scapula.

While viewing hand positioning in situ was not possible with the remains in their prone position, it did appear that the hands had been possibly directed to be folded at the waist, or lower abdomen (at a 25 to 30-degree angle). If so, then this suggests a previous handling of the body, or possible placement in a shroud, in which the hands had been intentionally placed in such a manner. If this hypothesis is correct, then at time of burial, the body was then flipped into its prone position and the skull was placed separate from the body, either haphazardly or intentionally as revealed. 

The body’s overall orientation was west-to-east except for the aforementioned skull. It was not placed in an exact west-to-east orientation, but more east/southeast, or 60-degrees E which is 30 degrees off an exact west-to-east positioning. However, it should be noted that other graves in the cemetery have not had exact W/E placement, so this detail may have no significance. This body was also placed on the south side of the burial chamber, identical with Grave-19, which is also characteristic of other burials in ST-1, again, possibly providing access for the grave digger to be in the chamber to guide the body through the entrance pit and the hole between the entrance pit and burial chamber.

Due to the unusual situation with these remains, age estimation at time of death could only be speculated through a cursory examination of the teeth of the mandible. All the teeth were intact with only moderate wear on the dentition. Since the 3rd molars were present, the individual was older than 18-years at time of death. Based on dentition alone, it is probable that this person did not exceed 35 years. (Young Adult 20-35). Teeth samples of the lower right premolars (PM-1, PM-2) were taken for later analysis. Skeletal levels of any part of the remains other than the skull could not be taken due to their inaccessibility by the equipment.
These remains were left in place to be viewed by attendees of the 7th Salzburg Conference on East Syriac Christianity in Central Asia and China. The remains were subsequently removed from the grave and handled according to procedure. Further osteological examination will be necessary to understand this burial and potential cause of death (see pgs. 51).

Element 83
Entrance pit

This element designated the entrance pit for Grave-20 and was revealed after the inadvertent discovery of the human skull from the skeletal remains of E-81 in the southeast corner of U-B3. Excavations of the 100 cm eastern extension of U-B3 failed to reveal this entrance pit, but the floor of the pit was discovered to the east of a small line of mudbricks (E-84) which marked the boundary between the entrance pit and the burial chamber (E-85) to Grave-20. (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 1-4, 21-22, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 4-7, 10).
Once Grave-20 was discovered, excavators left an earthen ledge—approximately 180 (E/W) x 50 (N/S) x 70 cm high—along the south baulk of the U-B3 extension. It was then that the south side of the grave’s entrance pit was seen. The north side of the pit was not discerned at all during excavations and thus destroyed. The surviving part of the pit measured 87 (N/S) x 20 (E/W) x 70 cm. Levels following discovery measured as follows:
W. 1154.209; C: 1154.033; E: 1154.056 m. asl. Once the floor of the pit was completely discerned, photos were taken in context with Grave-20. Final total station levels were as follows: W: 1153.787; C: 1153.779; E: 1153.741 m. asl.

Element 84
Mudbricks

This element designated mudbricks discovered in conjunction with Grave-20 in the southeast corner of U-B3. These bricks were not noticed in the unit’s soil fill until after the discovery of a human skull in association with the remains of Grave-20. Following the discovery of the entrance pit (E-83), part of the mudbricks was seen in the soil. This was a line of mudbricks with 4 courses wide and 2 rows high placed in a north/south line demarcating the entrance pit (E-83) from the burial chamber (E-85) of the grave. The bricks measured approximately 30 x 10 x 8 cm, making this cluster of bricks 60 cm in height. However, the surviving bricks may have only extended halfway across entrance of the burial chamber, thus additional, bricks may have been unintentionally removed during excavations. The level of the top brick measured 1153.940 m. asl.

Element 85
Burial Chamber

This element designated the burial chamber for Grave-20. It was revealed following the extension by 100 cm to the east of U-B3 after the inadvertent discovery of a human skull from the skeletal remains of E-81 in the southeast corner of U-B3. Once the skull was discovered, it was then realized that this burial chamber in association with the remains was visible in the east baulk. Once the area was cleared of loose soil and the entrance pit (E-83) and mudbricks (E-84) were also clearly revealed, excavations of the fill began. The soil was typical of the loamy soil throughout the cemetery, however, a significant amount of clay also made easily finding the chamber’s north wall difficult. Since it was desirous to see the construction of the chamber, excavations involved burrowing into the chamber while also taking care not to disturb the skeletal remains (E-81). The northeast part of the chamber was destroyed by excavations, yet, 75-80% of the chamber remained intact. The chamber was constructed as most of the grave in ST-1 with the chamber’s ceiling peaking at the east central section and then tapering to make room for the body’s legs. Soft soil in the southeast corner of the chamber was noted, creating indentations, which may have been caused by root damage.
Following removal of all soil, measurements of the chamber were as follows: 180 cm (E/W) x 85 (N/S). Highest point in chamber: 85 cm from floor. West section of the chamber where the skull (which was disarticulated from the rest of the body) was unmeasurable. The foot extension on the east end of the burial chamber was 20 cm tall. (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 1-4, 21-22, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 4-7, 10). Closing levels of the chamber were as follows: W: 1153.591; C: 1153.542 m. asl. E: unable to measure.

 

Excavation site №2. Suleimantepa 1 Burial ground.

List of Element.
Element 1. Turf and loamy lumpy upper layers.
Element 2. Burial 1.
Element 3. Burial 2.
Element 4. Burial 3.
Element 5. Dense light-brown natural loam.
Element 6. Burial 4.
Element 7. The skeleton of the burial chamber, of the burial 2 (3).
Element 8. Mud brick stone barrier of the entrance to the burial chamber 9 of the burial 4 (6).
Element 9. The burial chamber of burial 4 (6).
Element 10. The skeleton of the burial chamber (9), of the burial 4 (6).
Element 11. The burial chamber of burial 3 (4).
Element 12. The skeleton of the burial chamber (11), of the burial 3 (4).
Element 13. Entrance space of the mine (entrance) to the burial chamber (9) of the burial 4 (6).
Element 14. The burial chamber of burial 5.
Element 15. The skeleton of the burial chamber (14), of the burial 5.
Element 16. A silver cross from the burial chamber (10), of the burial 3 (4).

During the construction of a house in the private sector on a hillside, when removing light loamy soil mixed with fine rock crushed stone, human bones were discovered protruding from the soil at a height of 2 m from the top surface. At the same time, in the cross-section of the pit one can see the boundaries of the grave and protruding human bones. At the site where human skeletal remains were discovered, it was decided to establish the next excavation site, located 100 meters northeast of the previously excavated burials in 2022 (excavation area 1). (See Photo Appendix, Fig. 31-33).

Excavation site No. 2 is located on the north-eastern side, on the slope of a mountain hill, overgrown with herbaceous vegetation - camel thorn, burdock, etc., as well as low-growing bushes. Along with the low-growing reduced shrub, there grow trees of the variety Laeagnus commutata (silver oleaster) and wild apricots belonging to the common apricot Prunus armeniaca Lin., Armeniaca vulgaris Lam, bushes and trees of hawthorn (lat. Crataégus), belonging to the genus of the rose family (Rosaceae) , walnut trees (lat. Júglans régia) - a species of trees of the genus walnut of the walnut family (Juglandaceae), poplar (lat. Pópulus) - a genus of dioecious (rarely monoecious) deciduous fast-growing trees of the willow family (Salicaceae), pyramidal poplar (lat. Pópulus nígra var. itálica, or Populus nigra f. pyramidális) is a dioecious tree, a cultivated variety of black poplar (Populus nigra), elm, also known as elm, or elm (lat. Úlmus) is a genus of trees in the elm family (Ulmaceae).

The area around the excavation is grazing for cattle and small animals, and is covered with their excrement. Excavation site 2 measuring 3x9 m was laid out on the north-eastern steep slope of the hill, and is divided along its length in the north-east-north-west direction.
Upper southeastern excavation point: coordinates 1149.101; upper southwestern excavation point: coordinates 1149.123; lower northeastern excavation point: coordinates 1148.182. 50 meters north of the broken excavation there are plantings of fruit and berry trees and shrubs, behind which residential and economic buildings of local residents are built. After the completion of excavation and research work, the burial chambers and the excavation site were filled up.

Element 1.
Soddy and loamy lumpy top layers.

When removing the turf layer, the thickness of which is 0.5-0.7 cm, the root system of grasses and nearby growing trees is visible. In the soil excavated with a bayonet (30 cm), along the entire removed layer from top to bottom, as the level decreases – at the southeastern point of the excavation: coordinates 1148.404; southwestern excavation point: coordinates 1148.370; lower northeastern excavation point: coordinates 1148.050; northwestern excavation point: coordinates 1148.050, a lumpy-loose gray loam with the inclusion of white carbonates and small rocks can be traced (See Photo Appendix, Fig. 39-58).
At a depth of 40 cm from the northern point of the excavation, the layer of loose gray lumpy loam becomes moist, acquiring a brownish tint with whitish veins.
Due to the height period, the removed layer is not uniform everywhere. In the area of the northern baulk, as well as in the eastern and northern corners, the layer was removed to a depth of 25 cm. The southern wall is the highest. Here, due to the uneven height difference, the layer was removed to a depth of 30 cm to 1 m.
When removing the second layer with a shovel bayonet - 30 cm, in the north-eastern, eastern part of the excavation site by the northern baulk in a loose, lumpy layer, which can be traced in this area, an oval-shaped spot measuring 1 m, stretching from west to east, and 55 cm from south to north was identified.
On the southern side, when the loose layer is removed, a dense light brown loess finely dispersed natural soil can be traced, which was covered by looser lumpy loam.

Element 2.
Burial 1.

The described burial was discovered during the clearing of loose, lumpy loam (Element 1). The described Element is located in the southwestern, western part of the excavation area at a depth of 35 cm from the upper western point of the excavation, located at level 1149. 123. After clearing the layer of loess loam natural soil at level 1148.224, a gray spot of an elongated rectangular shape appeared, rounded at the end in the northeastern part. The spot is elongated in the west-east direction, and contrasts with a dark background on the light gray cleared surface of a dense fine loess light brown natural soil (See Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 59-68, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 12-13).
The burial consists of an inlet grave corridor located on the eastern side, and presumably a crypt located on the western side.
The length of the inlet grave corridor is 1.35 m from east to west, and 90 cm from south to north.

After thorough clearing, fragments of two light gray mud bricks are located on the surface between the corridor and the crypt.
The burial chamber in the form of a square spot, measuring 74x55-56 cm, is located outside the excavation area. The true dimensions of the crypt and the internal contents remain to be clarified during excavations.

Element 3.
Burial 2.

This burial is located in the northwestern part of the excavation. The described burial was discovered as a result of excavations of the hillside for the purpose of making a site for the construction of a house. Human bone remains appeared here - tibia and fibula, phalanges and metatarsal bones of the feet. Later, when clearing the northern wall of the excavation, the silhouettes of a burial chamber appeared, at the bottom of which the bones of human legs were visible in the filling layer. On the eastern side, 1.70 m from 2 (3), the burial ground 4 (6) is located, that was also discovered during the clearing of the north-eastern part of the hill. During the removal of soil from the hillside, the inlet burial corridor – the dromos, was completely destroyed.
The burial was dug in the natural loess fine loam. This burial represents a suboval spot in the section, located 1 m below the modern level. At the first preliminary measurements, the height of the spot is 75 cm, width 75 cm (see Appendix “Photo Appendix”, Fig. 69-78, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 12, 14).
The bottom of the supposed burial is slightly rounded in cross-section, the walls are arched, gradually expanding upward, ending in a rounded vault.
Below, a rectangular loamy brick was revealed, apparently from the masonry that covered the crypt from the side of the feet. The brick size was 30x10x16 cm.
The fill in the described burial spot consists of loose, lumpy gray loam, with the inclusion of small rocky stones. The root system of plants can be traced in the fill.

Element 4.
Burial 3.

This burial is located in the northeastern part of the excavation. The described burial was discovered as a result of excavations of the hillside for a house building site. Later, when clearing the northern wall of the excavation area, silhouettes of a burial chamber appeared, at the bottom of which, in the filling layer, the bones of human legs were visible - phalanges and metatarsal bones of the foot. On the western side, at 1.30 m of the burial, the burial 4 (6) is located, also discovered during the clearing of the northeastern part of the hill. During the removal of soil from the hillside, the inlet burial corridor - dromos - was not discovered. When collecting soil, the dromos was completely destroyed by machinery.
The burial was dug in continental loessal fine loam, and in cross-section it looks like an uneven basement spot with uneven walls. The upper part of the vault of the burial chamber can be traced to a depth of 1.20 m below the modern level. At a depth of 1.85 m, the bottom of the chamber can be traced. On the eastern side of the burial chamber, the walls slope from top to bottom. The western wall seems to be slanted, judging by the stratigraphic section, and has a sharp slant inward.
At the first preliminary measurements, the height of the chamber is 60-65 cm, the width of the chamber is 90-95 cm. The section shows the filling of the burial chamber, consisting of lumpy loose loam, with the inclusion of small rocky stones. The plant root system can be traced in the fill. In the section above, in the area of the vault, traces of peeling and falling of the natural loam into the burial chamber are visible.
Digging up the natural loam in the north-eastern part of the excavation, at a depth of 1.10 m a spot was discovered measuring 1 m in length and 55 cm in width, oriented in the west-east direction, a light gray spot distinguishable against the background of light brown natural loam.

Element 5.
Hard light brown natural loam.

Digging and then clearing the surface, after opening the loose lumpy layer on the southern side, a dense light brown loessal fine natural soil can be traced, which was covered by looser lumpy loam.
Natural fine loess loam can be traced at a depth of 50 cm, from the upper surface. When the top layer of loose, lumpy loam is removed after cleaning the surface, a dense, moist, brown loam can be seen, which, when dried, acquires a light brown tone, with white veins. (see Photo Application, Fig. 91-109)
With a further deepening of 30 cm in the northern and northeastern parts, the soil is dense, gradually becoming denser as you move in the southern direction.
When removing the second layer with a shovel bayonet - 30 cm, in the north-eastern, eastern part of the excavation area at the northern baulk, in a loose, lumpy layer that can be traced in this area, an oval-shaped spot was identified stretching 1 m from west to east, and 55 cm from south to north.

Element 6.
Burial 4.

The described burial was discovered during the cleaning of the northern wall of the excavation site. This burial is located between burials 2 (3) and 3 (4), and was discovered during the clearing of the northeastern part of the hill.
This burial is a sub-rectangular spot in cross-section, located 70 cm below the modern level. At the first measurements, the height of the spot is 95 cm - 1 m, width 75 cm in the lower part, 83 cm in the middle part (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 110-121, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 12, 16).
The bottom of the supposed burial is round in section, the walls gradually expand upward, ending in a rounded vault.
Below, a rectangular loamy brick was revealed, apparently from the masonry that covered the crypt from the side of the feet. The brick size was 30x10x16 cm.
The filling in the described burial spot consists of loose, lumpy gray loam, with the inclusion of small rocky stones. The plant root system can be traced in the filling.
Later, during excavations of the burial, the described loamy spot in the section turned out to be a partially destroyed inlet corridor - the dromos, which will be described below.
Element 7.
The skeleton of the burial chamber, of the burial 2 (3).

When clearing a pit for building a house on the hillside on the east side While clearing burial chamber 2 (3) from the internal filling of loose, lumpy loam, a human skeleton was found on the floor of the chamber. The person was buried according to the rite of inhumation. The skeleton lay in an anatomical order in an elongated position, in a southwest-northeast direction, on a dense adobe loess natural floor. The length of the skeleton is 1.20 m. The head lay on the southwestern side, in a narrow part at the end of the burial chamber, on a slightly elevated sloping ledge. The skeleton's face is facing east. When clearing the skeleton, the right arm lay straight along the body, the left arm, bent at the elbow, lay in the abdominal area. The skeleton's legs were slightly apart (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 122-128, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 12, 14).
As a result of the destruction of the burial during the digging of a pit and the removal of loam, the tibia and fibula and feet of the skeleton were lost.
During cleaning, no accompanying material was found in the burial chamber.

Element 8.
Mud brick (stone) barrier of the entrance to the burial chamber 9 of the burial 4 (6).

While clearing the remains of the destroyed burial corridor on the eastern side, we discovered a hole into the burial chamber (9), blocked by a masonry of mud bricks. The mortgage consisted of seven mud bricks, three of which were rectangular in shape, and arrived intact. The remaining four survived in fragments. The bricks of the (stone) barrier lay on the flat floor of the threshold of the entrance hole, and were fastened with clay mortar. The three lower bricks are rectangular in shape, 40x20x8 cm in size. The three upper rows of smaller bricks have traces of breakage due to the narrowness of the opening in the upper part. The fourth brick from the bottom measures 33x20x10 cm. Part of the brick crumbled during cleaning. The second brick has a size of 30x20x10 cm. The size of the two upper bricks cannot be determined with accuracy due to their severe destruction. At the moment, their size has been preserved: 1) 30x8x8 cm; 2) 24x10x6 cm (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 129-134, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 12, 15).
Outside the brick (stone) barrier, 37 cm from the brick deposit, on the floor of the corridor passage lay a fragment of brick measuring 26x16x10 cm.

Element 9.
The burial chamber of burial 4 (6).

The burial chamber is elongated, 1.60 m long from the threshold to the head, dug into dense loess natural loam on the hillside. The chamber is oriented in the southwest-northeast direction. On the north-eastern side of the burial chamber there is an entrance opening blocked with mud bricks. The entrance opening to the burial chamber is wide and flat, 50 cm long at the bottom, 42 cm at the top, 20 cm wide. The walls of the grave are inclined, on their surface there are visible incisions left by tools. The edges of the walls close together at the top and form the vault of the burial chamber, the height of which at the head is 65 cm, width 70-72 cm, and 80 cm in the central part. In the area of the head, the wall is relatively flat, with marks from tools visible on the surface. The height in the central part is 65 cm. The walls of the entrance, like the walls of the burial chamber in the area of the head, are slightly curved. Here the wall turns slightly to the south. The width in this corner reaches 1.05 m. In the central and north-eastern side it is 95 cm wide. The floor of the chamber at the head (level 1146.351), in the center (level 1146.323) and at the feet (level 1146.378), is uneven, with a slight bend at center, dense, slightly smoothed (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 135-137, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 12, 15).
On the north-eastern side of the burial chamber there is a mine (entrance) entrance space with a threshold of 18 cm in height. It is wide at the bottom - 50 cm, the mine space narrows in the upper part in the area of the vault - 30 cm. The width of the mine is 20 cm.
The entrance opening was filled with rectangular mud bricks (8) from bottom to top, six bricks in one row, fastened with clay mortar.
In front of the entrance opening on the eastern side, a corridor opening - a dromos - has been partially preserved.

Element 10.
The skeleton of the burial chamber (9), of the burial 4 (6).

During clearing, no accompanying material was found in the burial chamber.
While cleaning the burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6), a human skeleton was found on the floor of the chamber. The person was buried according to the rite of inhumation. The skeleton lay in an anatomical order in an elongated position, in a southwest-northeast direction, on a dense adobe loess continental floor. The length of the skeleton is 1.50 m. The head lay on the southwestern side, in a narrow part at the end of the burial chamber, on a slightly elevated place at level 1146. 512. The face of the skeleton is facing east. The right hand rested on the chest, the left on the stomach. The pelvis lay at the level of 1146.334. The skeleton's legs were slightly spread apart and lay at level 1146.393(see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 138-147, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 12, 15).
After completing the clearing of the skeleton, teeth were extracted from the upper jaw of the skull for analysis.
During cleaning, no accompanying material was found in the burial chamber.

Element 11.
The burial chamber of burial 3 (4).

The burial chamber is elongated, 1.90 m long, dug into dense loess natural loam on the hillside. The chamber is oriented in the southwest-northeast direction. The walls of the grave are rounded, with visible incisions left by tools on the surface. The walls are slightly rounded, closing at the top, forming the vault of the burial chamber, the height of which is 74-76 cm.
The entrance opening to the burial chamber is 90-95 cm wide and flat at the bottom. The walls of the entrance, like the walls of the burial chamber in the area of the head, are slightly curved. Here the wall turns slightly to the south. The width in this corner reaches 1.05 m. In the central and north-eastern side, it is 95 cm wide. The floor of the chamber is relatively flat, dense, slightly smoothed.
In the central and northeastern parts, the vaults of the burial chamber peel off and collapse. When clearing the entrance of the burial at different levels, along with the filling, clay pieces of different sizes from the collapsed vault of the chamber were traced (see Appendix “Photo Application”, Fig. 148-157, Appendix “Drawings”, Fig. 12, 16).
During the study of the burial, the inlet corridor - dromos - was not identified due to its destruction during the digging of a foundation pit for the house, and the collection of loam for construction needs.

Element 12.
The skeleton of the burial chamber (11), of the burial 3 (4).

While clearing the burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6), a human skeleton was found on the floor of the chamber. The person was buried according to the rite of inhumation. The skeleton lay in an anatomical order in an elongated position, in a southwest-northeast direction, on a dense adobe loess natural floor. The length of the skeleton is 1.70 m. The head lay on the southwestern side, in a narrow part at the end of the burial chamber, on a slightly elevated place. The skeleton's face is facing east. The right hand rested on the chest, the left on the stomach. The skeleton's legs are slightly apart.
After the clearing was completed, the skeleton bones were removed for analysis (see Appendix Photo Appendix, Figures 158-166, Appendix Drawings, Figures 12, 16).
During clearing, silver flat plates were discovered between the soles of the feet, apparently from a cross (16).

Element 13.
Entrance space of the mine (entrance) to the burial chamber (9) of the burial 4 (6).

The entrance space of the mine (entrance) of the burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6) is located on the northeast side. Wide in the lower part - 50 cm, the space of the mine narrows in the upper part in the area of the vault - 30 cm. The width of the mine is 20 cm. The lower part of the entrance ends with a kind of threshold, the height of which is 18 cm, behind which the burial chamber begins.
On both sides on the outer and inner sides there are arched projections - portals, ending at the top of the vault with a rectangular arm measuring 18-20x20 cm.
The height of the right portal is 60 cm, width – 18 cm, length – 20 cm. The height of the left portal is 60 cm, width – 20 cm, length – 20 cm.
The entrance opening was filled with rectangular mud bricks (8) from bottom to top, six bricks in one row, fastened with clay mortar.
In front of the entrance opening on the eastern side, a corridor opening - dromos - has been partially preserved (see Photo Appendix, Fig. 167-168).

Element 14.
The burial chamber of burial 5.

The elongated burial chamber, 1.80 m long, was dug into dense loess natural loam at the base of the hillside. The burial was destroyed during the digging of a pit for the foundation of the house and the collection of loam for construction needs. The burial chamber was discovered during a clearing of the hillside to identify previously unknown burials. The chamber, 1.80 m long and 95 cm wide, is ornamented in the southwest-northeast direction. The walls of the grave were slightly rounded, with traces of incisions left by tools during digging of the burial chamber. The walls are slightly rounded, closing at the top, forming the vault of the burial chamber, the height of which is 70 cm.
Due to destruction, the entrance opening to the burial chamber has not been preserved. At the entrance site, fragments of mud bricks were discovered, which apparently formed the barrier at the entrance to the burial chamber. It is not possible to determine the true dimensions of the bricks due to their severe deformation (see Appendix Photo Appendix, Figures 169-172, Appendix Drawings, Figures 12, 16, 17).

Element 15.
The skeleton of the burial chamber (14), of the burial 5.

While cleaning the burial chamber (14), a human skeleton was found on the floor of the chamber. The person was buried according to the rite of inhumation. The skeleton lay in an anatomical order in an elongated position, in a southwest-northeast direction, on a dense, leveled adobe loess natural floor. The length of the skeleton is 1.70 m. When the burial was cleared, the skull was missing. The lower part of the skull was preserved, lying on the left side, near the shoulder in the destroyed burial part at the end of its narrow part, on a slightly elevated place. The left arm of the skeleton, bent at the elbow, rested on the chest, the right arm lay in the abdomen. The skeleton's legs are slightly apart (see Photo Appendix, Figure 173).
During cleaning, no accompanying material was found in the burial chamber.

Element 16.
A silver cross from the burial chamber (10), of the burial 3 (4).

While cleaning the burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6), a human skeleton was found on the floor of the chamber. During cleaning, two silver flat strips were discovered between the soles of the feet, apparently from a cross, fastened with small bronze nails, on a partially preserved decayed wooden plank, of which small fragments have survived.
Flat strips, partially curved, made of silver, elongated in shape with a flare at the ends. The largest strip is 6.3 cm long, 8 mm wide in the flare area, 6 mm in the middle, and 2 mm thick. The second strip is 3.4 cm long, 8 mm wide in the flare area, 4 mm in the middle, 2 mm thick. The strips are fastened with two bronze nails: the first nail is 8 mm long and 2 mm thick; the second nail is 5 mm long, 2 mm thick (see Appendix Photo Appendix, Figures 174-180, Appendix Drawings, Figures 12, 16).

Cultural Material Finds

Very few cultural material finds are present in the soil of the monastic cemetery at Suleyman Tepa including within the graves themselves. This, of course, is not an unusual feature for Christian burials in comparison to their Bronze and Iron Age counterparts both within Central Asia and around the world (fn). However, even in comparison with other Central Asian medieval Christian cemeteries, the finds at Urgut are particularly stark. (fn) Across two seasons of digging involving the excavation of 24 graves and 172,8 m2 at Suleyman Tepa, several fragments of pottery were found have been discovered and until the discovery of the possible metal cross in Grave № 4 of ST-2 that will be described below, no grave goods have ever been found. As mentioned in last year’s report, this lack of grave goods—however small most Christian finds may be in these settings usually limited to personal items such as jewelry (earrings, rings, pectoral crosses, etc.) (fn)—speaks to the monastic setting and serves as evidence that these graves are those of the monks connected to the monastery at the site. Men who have sworn to a vow of poverty would not be expected to have worldly possessions on their person, and the monastic graves at Suleyman Tepe seem to confirm this expectation.
While the sample of pottery finds are quite limited, the finds are congruent with the chronological interpretation of the remains and the previous radiocarbon dating (9th-13th centuries). This section provides description details of the cultural material finds found during the 2023 excavations.

Pottery Finds

Metal Find: Silver Processional Cross
Supplemental report by Steven T. Gilbert and Charles Anthony Stewart
During the 2023 field season at Urgut archaeologists discovered a silver cross (Fig. 1). This artifact was uncovered in burial chamber E-11, located on the southern sector of the newly revealed ST-2, Unit A.  It was within the grave among the human remains (E-12, Grave 23). During excavations in the lower appendicular area (legs) of the skeleton, a very thin metal fragment with a green patina was discovered exactly at the midpoint between the tibias—15 cm from each bone which were 30 cm apart—and 20 cm below the knees and 15 cm above the feet.

These two strips of very thin metal had small rivets or nails attached to wood fragments. The soil surrounding the artifact was a slightly darker gray than the rest of the soil fill, indicating it once contained organic material, such as wood. This soil was carefully sifted and investigated as well as the areas all around the appendicular bones. Photos and videos were taken of the metal artifact during the excavation process. In the field, the metal strips were parallel to one another laying vertically on their sides (rather than flat). The soil matrix that these metal strips were positioned approximately 5 cm above the burial chamber floor.
Initial investigation in the field lab indicated that these metal strips were made of silver or silver alloys. One strip measured 63 mm long and was 4 mm wide at its narrowest point and gradually expanded (or flared outwards from the center) on each side. The ends measured 8 mm. The second strip measured 34 mm long, but only one end was flared. Both pieces have a concave curvature towards the ends.  If this concave shape reflects the original design of the artifact, then it could have been affixed to a wood orb, perhaps, for a type of regalia—for example, an orbis mundi or globus cruciger.  Since such regalia is unknown in Central Asia, the curvature is likely a result of the tarnishing and desiccation process; as the wood, which was attached to it, decayed the silver became warped.  The longer strip (63 mm) had two nails or rivets, one about 2 mm from the end in the center of flare that was 8 mm long, the other in the center of the strip was 3 mm long. Each rivet had a square-shaped head 2 mm in diameter. Based on the oxidation, the rivets were probably copper or iron, however, this has not been fully tested in the lab.
The shorter strip (34 mm) had a square-shaped hole on the narrow end and a rivet with wood still adhering to it; this wood stretched about 15 mm along the curvature of the strip on the concaved (i.e. inner) side. Wood fragments were also found within the soil around the metal strips during excavations and another wood fragment was attached to the end rivet on the longer strip, but had detached during investigations in the lab. Further analysis should allow for the identification of the type of wood upon which that this artifact was affixed.
The strips were laying parallel and close to each other (separated by 1 cm) in the grave with the longer strip to the north of the shorter strip.  Examination in the lab indicated that the nail in the center of the long strip served as a rivet to connect with the shorter strip. The second, shorter strip was likely attached to a similar (mirrored) piece of the same dimensions, but this part was not uncovered from the grave. If so, the longer piece would have been attached to the second shorter strip (which originally was twice as long). Because the nail in the center measured 3 mm long and the end nail is 8 mm, we can reasonable reconstruct this as a typical flare-armed cross (croix pattée), which is common in Central Asia at sites affiliated with the Church of the East. In other words, the long strip served as the upper and lower arms of the cross, while the short strip was the right arm, while the left arm was broken off and is now missing. We can assume that the shorter strip was already broken and incomplete when it was deposited in the burial—perhaps that is the reason why it was buried and not retained by the living.
If our proposed reconstruction is correct, the cross (assuming it had four arms), had a probable dimension of 68 by 63 mm, with one long crossbar piece forming the vertical beam and one smaller strips forming the horizontal beam. The lower arm of the cross was slightly longer than the other three, forming a so-called “Latin cross”. It is certain that these silver strips were attached to a wooden artifact that had deteriorated over the centuries. Given the monastic context of the burials, the artifact would have been utilized by the local ecclesiastical community. Enough evidence survives from textual and art historical sources to suggest two possible functions of this cross—a processional cross (used during the Syriac liturgy) (known today as ṣlībā d-zūyāḥē, ܨܠܝܒ̣ܐ ܕܙܘܝܚ̈ܐ ) or a hand cross (ṣlībā d-īdā,  ܨܠܝܒ̣ܐ ܕܐܝܕܐ ).
When the Church of the East was established in the 5th century it already developed liturgical practices and regalia that was common to the other Christian communities. One aspect that was shared by the Latin-, Greek-, Armenian-, Coptic-speaking Christians (among others) is the processional entrances and exits; these are ritual or ceremonial parades in which participants move from one designated (or demarcated) space, like a monument or landmark, to another. The Turfan Service Book dated to the ninth century describes how the Syriac liturgy and funerary services in Central Asia included processions of the clergy together with the congregation, both within the church, during the liturgy, and from different stations within the city, during funerals (Hunter and Coakley 2017). Within these parades, crowds were guided by a processional cross that was lifted up for all to see; that is, quite literally, the congregation would follow the cross to their particular destination—fulfilling Christ’s command for his followers to “lift up [their] cross daily and follow me” (Luke 9:23).
These processional crosses were usually made of metal (gold, silver or bronze) and they could be plain or decorated; the metal cross was usually affixed to a wood pole—either a tang at the bottom of the cross penetrated the pole or the cross had a socket into which the pole was inserted. The pole served to lift the cross high into the air, as well as a stand to place the cross (into a base) when it was not being used. As such, the Urgut silver cross probably adorned a wood processional cross, as reconstructed in figure 2. Ideally, the entire cross would be made of precious metals that would have been highly reflective and conspicuous for crowds to see during processionals. So, we surmise that the Urgut processional cross manifested a balance between the use of expensive silver, in a limited scale, nailed to an inexpensive wood armature; as such, it was a suitable item that symbolized Syriac monasticism’s adherence to the virtue of poverty, while utilizing the best available materials for worship.

Many medieval processional crosses are preserved from Syria and the Byzantine Empire, and so their use is well-documented in western Asia (Dodd 1987; Cotsonis 1994). Fewer examples have been found in Central Asia—that is why the discovery at Urgut is so significant. A few Church of the East processional crosses have been found in Arabia; these have designs and styles closely corresponding to Byzantine examples—which is not surprising given the proximity and shared heritage—these date to the Sassanid Empire (5th to 6th centuries) (Potts 1994).  Likewise, there is a Sassanid-period seal-stamp that depicts a leader (bishop or priest) carrying a processional cross, wearing clothing common to Parthians, Persians, and Sogdians; because the individual seems to be wearing a turban, he may be Turkic (fig. 3) (Lerner 1977: no.16). Further east, a painting on silk has been preserved of a Christian figure (Christ, saint, or bishop?) holding a small processional cross, which would have a similar scale to the hypothetical Urgut processional cross (fig. 4). This painting was found in the Mogao Caves (Cave no. 17) in Dunhuang, China; note also that this image includes a pectoral cross (necklace) and a crown surmounted by a cross (Tang 2020). Perhaps the most remarkable processional cross—certainly belonging to the Church of the East—was found in Herat, Afghanistan (fig. 5). When it was found it was missing its upper arm (like the Urgut cross was missing its left arm). By the 14th century, processional crosses seem to have been a commonplace object in Christian communities; evidence for this can be found gravestones of the Chu and Ili Valleys (Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan) which often depict processional crosses (with tangs) (Stewart 2022: 145-182).
These processional crosses had four main purposes. First, they guided liturgical parades that took place during regular liturgical worship as well special occasions, such as feast days, festivals, and funerals. Second, they signify theological concepts such prefiguration; for instance, how the cross of Christ (representing the new covenant) replaced the bronze serpent of Moses (the old covenant) (Numbers 21:6-9; John 3:14). Third, processional crosses served as public expressions of faith; especially, when crowds of Christians would parade through cities as the “Body of Christ”. Fourth, they were mnemonic devices to bring to mind the historical cross being erected on the hill of Golgotha; during the Eucharistic celebration (Holy Qurbana) this fulfills Christ’s command to “Do this in remembrance of me” (Mark 14:22-25, Luke 22:18-20,1 Corinthians 11:23-25). It was crucial that the bread and wine symbolized the broken body and blood spilt at Golgotha—and that was not forgotten. In other words, the cross near (or on) the altar was intended to remind participants of the historical crucifixion.
 Alternatively, the Urgut silver cross could have adorned a smaller type of regalia called a “hand cross.”  These are common in Coptic and Ethiopian liturgical traditions, as well as current Syriac-speaking communities across Asia (figs. 6 and 7). Unlike processional crosses that belong to the church (as a whole), hand crosses are more personal and owned by individuals. They can be considered as symbols of authority and the pastoral office for clergy, such as bishops and abbots (and abbesses)—as such, they are similar to shepherd’s crook or crosier in the Latin- and Greek-speaking churches. For the patriarch-catholicos and archbishops, the hand cross is often accompanied by the ḥuṭrā (ܚܘܛܪܐ ) which is the scepter representing the highest office—in turn, this signifies temporal authority (as that of a monarch), while the hand cross signifies spiritual authority (as that of a pastor) (figs. 6 and 7).
 

Figure 2. Silver fixture (cross pattée) for a processional cross. Faded area reconstructed by C. A. Stewart. From burial chamber E-11 (Element ST-2, Unit A), Urgut Expedition F2023, Archaeological Expertise, LLP.

Fig. 3. Hypothetical reconstruction of the processional cross. From burial chamber E-11 (Locus ST-2, Unit A), Urgut Expedition F2023, Archaeological Expertise, LLP (Charles A. Stewart)


Fig. 4. Saint or Bishop holding a Processional Cross. Perforated Stamp Seal for a necklace. Pahlavi Inscription: BYŠP (Bishapur?). Agate. 6th century AD (?). Early Sassanid Persian Empire. Measurements: 1.30 cm (L) by 1.90 cm (W) by 1.80 cm (thickness). British Museum (London) Inv. No. 103003; Regis. No. 1909,0508.3 (Courtesy: British Museum)

 

 

Fig.5. Christian Figure Holding a Processional Cross [Note also the pectoral cross (necklace) and a crown surmounted by a cross]. Ink and Paint on Silk. From the Mogao Caves (Cave no. 17) (Dunhuang, China). 9th century AD (?). Tang Empire. Measurements: 88 cm (H) by 55 cm (W). British Museum (London) Regis. No. 1919,0101,0.1 (48) (a) Photograph Courtesy of the British Museum; (b) Reconstruction by unknown Japanese artist, modified by C.A. Stewart

Fig.6. Processional Cross from Herat (Afghanistan) with Pahlavi Inscription. Bronze. Ghaznavid Empire, ca. 1139-49 AD. (a) Photograph from Gignoux 2001; (b) Reconstruction by C.A. Stewart.

 

Fig. 7. Giwargis (of Christ) as Bishop of Palur.  Wall Painting dated to around 1585 AD.  St. Mary's Jacobite Soonoro Cathedral, Angamaly (Kerala, India).

Fig. 8. Mar Awa III, the 122nd Catholicos-Patriarch of the
Holy Apostolic Catholic Assyrian Church of the East, of the Apostolic See of Seleucia-Ctesiphon (Photograph 2023).  

 

Urgut 2023 Field Forensics

Excavations during the 2023 season at the monastic cemetery on Suleman Tepa revealed 7 graves (3 in ST-1, 4 in ST-2). Additionally, disarticulated remains discovered by nearby residents and provided to the archaeological team indicated a minimum of 5 individuals. This means that over the past two seasons, 24 graves have been excavated and the remains of at least 8 other individuals [may need to add remains found in topsoil, get E number] have been discovered, for a total of 32 individuals. The following osteological data are summaries of grave excavations with a focus upon burial practice, osteological condition, preliminary investigation of sex and age range, and any obviously observable pathology. The excavations were conducted by trained archaeologists with experience in grave excavation as well as one trained anthropologist. The results taken in the field during the excavation process should not be considered the definitive results that later laboratory analysis can correct or clarify.

Care was taken to expose the graves utilizing small hand tools and brushes. The remains were kept in place for recordation purposes that included burial chamber measurements, photography, and 3D-photogrammatry. Once this process was completed, the remains were then carefully exhumed, cleared of excess soil, the appendicular bones and pelvis was measured, the remains were packed in aluminum foil, bagged, boxed, and labeled. In some instances, additional examination and photographs were taken of the skull and mandible of each skeleton in which the skull was intact to assist with examination of the sex and non-metric traits as well as dentition to assist with age estimation.

Sex and age estimation was based on Tim D. White and Pieter A. Folkens 2005, The Human Bone Manual. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press and J. E. Buikstra, J.E. and D. H. Ubelaker, (eds) 1994, Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains, Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series No. 44, Fayetteville. No attempt was made in the field to provide scale numbers regarding either cranial or pelvic data for sex identification, but instead only a basic observation within the various ranges. Age ranges were based on the broad categories of Fetus (before birth); Infant (0-3 yrs); Child (3-12 yrs); Adolescent (12-20 yrs); Young Adult (20-35 yrs); Middle Adult (35-50 yrs); Old Adult (50+ yrs). No sub-adult skeletons were discovered in the cemetery nor were any female remains identified. A concluding general summary of the findings is provided at the conclusion of this section.

 

E- 81 (ST-1, Unit-B-3, Grave 20)

Measurements:
No individual bone measurements taken in field.
Entire length: 150 cm (without skull)



Body Description:
            Body position: Extended, prone.
            Directional orientation of the body: Head
at west, yet detached from body, feet at east.
Position of hands: under body on anterior side,
appeared to be at about 25 to 30-degree angle.
            Head position: Detached from body, placed to
northwest of cervical vertebrae, with skull placed with gaze facing downward.

Grave Goods: None

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (95% or greater)
           
Age determination estimation features:
            Epiphyses fused:  Yes
            Deciduous teeth: No
            Signs of osteoarthritis:  No

Age Estimation: Young Adult (20-35) or Middle Adult (35-50)

Cranial Sex determination observations:

Orbital shape: N/A
            Orbital rim: blunt           
            Sub-orbital ridges: N/A
            Forehead: upright              
            Mandible breadth: wide
            Nuchal crest: smooth
            Mastoid process: large  
            Mental eminence: pronounced

Additional comments/observations: Skeleton placed in an unusual prone position, with the head possibly detached from the body (pre-mortem?). Additionally, the lumbar vertebrae seem somewhat unusual (additional facets or unfused?). Vertebral column seems curved (possible scoliosis?) Curve in spine was to the left side of the body. Skull was damaged by a shovel strike during excavation as the grave had gone undetected by excavators. Right pelvis is strangely displaced with the superior side flipped inferiorly. Such displacement seems to have occurred postmortem since it was anatomically impossible pre-mortem, unless this is connected with cause of death. After further examination, the C-1 vertebra was revealed 10 cm from the skull, C-4 also appeared detached from other vertebrae. The mandible was exposed and separate from the skull and laying laterally just to the west of the left scapula and south of the C-4 vertebra, thus the C-4 and the mandible were on top of the posterior side of the body. Head detached from body with gave downward. Head lying vertically at a 90-degree angle in relation to the body. This does not appear to be a result of natural activity (i.e. root or rodent) in the grave. Teeth samples taken.

Excavation year: 2023.

 

E-86 (ST-1, Unit B-1, Grave 18)



Measurements: (mm)
            Femur: L: 462 / R: 465
            Humerus: L: 323 / R: 324     
            Radius: L: damaged / R: 248
            Ulna:  L: 268 / R: damaged               
Tibia:  L: 380 / R: 370              
Fibula:  L: 358 / R: 344            
Cranium:   not taken        
Pelvis (width):  34 cm          
Entire length: 155 cm

Body Description:
            Body position: Extended, supine.
            Directional orientation of the body: Head
at west, feet at east.
Position of hands: L above R, across thoracic, R. 90-degees; L. ~65-degrees.
            Head position: Not raised, askance north.

Grave Goods: None.

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (95% or greater)
           
Age determination estimation features:
            Epiphyses fused:  Yes
            Deciduous teeth: No
            Signs of osteoarthritis:  Yes

Age Estimation:  Middle Adult (35-50 yrs).

Cranial Sex determination observations:
Orbital shape: square
            Orbital rim:      blunt      
            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced
            Forehead:   upright            
            Mandible breadth: wide
            Nuchal crest: rugged
            Mastoid process:   small
            Mental eminence

Possible Sex: Male

Additional comments/observations: Bones of a large male, and quite robust. Head position was askance to the south and eyes down toward the east, possibly displaced due to collapse of the bricks. Left foot slightly twisted laterally, may be indicative of body’s height exceeding the length of interment chamber. Taphonomic damage on axial skeleton, particularly the lower pelvic region and specifically the ischiopubic ramus along with the lumbar vertebrae and sacrum. Arms across thoracic cavity, with left arm at sternum at approximately 120-degree ancle, right arm at 110-degree angle. Cranial features strongly favor male. Left thoracic region shows severe taphonomic damage with 6 lower ribs detached from posterior ribs. Mudbricks used to close burial chamber collapsed on the left clavicle and scapula. Head may have been displaced due to the body’s height since the burial chamber was slightly too small for the length of the remains. Teeth samples taken. 

 

Excavation year: 2023.


E-87 (ST-1, Unit-B-3, Grave 19)

Measurements: (mm)
            Femur: L: 455 / R: not taken     Humerus:   L:318 / not taken      
            Radius: L: 248 / R: 252
            Ulna:    R: 272 / R: 272             
Tibia:   R: 358 / R: 360             
Fibula: not taken           
Cranium: not taken       
Pelvis (width):  34 cm             
Entire length: 168 cm

Body Description:
            Body position: Extended, supine.
            Directional orientation of the body: Head
at west, feet at east.
Position of hands: across upper abdomen at 45-degree angles, L just above R
            Head position: Not raised, gaze to N.

Grave Goods: None.

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 3 (95% or greater)
           
Age determination estimation features:
            Epiphyses fused:  Yes
            Deciduous teeth: No
            Signs of osteoarthritis: Indeterminate

Age Estimation: Middle Adult (35-50 yrs).

Cranial Sex determination observations:
Orbital shape: square
            Orbital rim:  blunt      
            Sub-orbital ridges: unpronounced
            Forehead: sloped              
            Mandible breadth: narrow
            Nuchal crest: Not taken
            Mastoid process:  small
            Mental eminence: pronounced

Possible Sex: Male

Additional comments/observations: During excavations, several phalange and extremity bones found scattered throughout the grave fill, probably due to root or rodent activity. Bone structure is slight, but pelvic indicators suggest male. Head is askance with gaze to N. On the right side, number 3 and 4 ribs appear to have had a pre-mortem break that were fully healed at time of death. Skeleton based on dentition appears to be either a Middle Adult (35-50 yrs) or Old Adult (50+ yrs) at time of death. Teeth samples taken.

 

Excavation year: 2023. 

E-7 (ST-2, Unit-A-1, Grave 21)

Measurements:
            No individual bone measurements
taken in field.
Entire length: 109 cm (lower legs
missing)

Body Description:
            Body position: Extended, supine.
Directional orientation of the body: Head at west, feet at east.
Position of hands: R prone with hand lateral of pelvis,
L 90-degree angle at upper abdomen.           

Head position: Raised, but head collapsed to the S. post interment

 

Excavation year: 2023.

E-10 (ST-2, Unit-1-A, Grave 22)

Measurements:
            No individual bone measurements
taken in field.
Entire length:  154 cm

Body Description:
            Body position: Extended, supine.
            Directional orientation of the body: Head
at west, feet at east.
Position of hands: R 90-degree angle across lower,
L ~80-degree angle at lower abdomen.
            Head position: Raised

Grave Goods: No

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 1 (95% or greater)
           

Age determination estimation features:
            Epiphyses fused:  Yes
            Deciduous teeth: No
            Signs of osteoarthritis:  No

Age Estimation: Young Adult (20-35 yrs)

Cranial Sex determination observations:
Orbital shape: round
            Orbital rim:  blunt          
            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced
            Forehead:  upright           
            Mandible breadth: wide
            Nuchal crest: inaccessible
            Mastoid process: inaccessible
            Mental eminence:  triangular

Possible Sex: Male

Additional comments/observations: This grave was identified in the baulk of the construction site, but remained undisturbed by the equipment. Mudbricks of the grave to the E, which demonstrated a difference in grave construction from ST-1 (6 courses, 1 row). Condition of the skeletal remains were excellent with no bones missing. Nasal bone large and extended. Age indicators: Moderate wear to teeth, fully fused sacrum, but the no. 1 may still have a visible fusion line. No indication of wear in the vertebral column or distal humerus/ulna, etc. Fusion of the femoral epiphysis still somewhat visible, thus age is possibly 20-35 years at time of death. Head was raised and body at a slight angle (SW to NE; E 60 degrees) as thought the burial chamber was not quite long enough for the remains. Length of the burial chamber, 165 cm (wall to bricks). Tooth sample taken of lower right PM-2. Only one sample taken to prevent possible cranial damage. Sacrum not at a sharp angle like many males, but other pelvic indicators show male. All teeth present, though some dislodged post-mortem.

 

Excavation year: 2023.

 

E-12 (ST-2, Unit-A-1, Grave 23)

Measurements:
             No individual bone measurements
taken in field.
Entire length: 170 cm

Body Description:
            Body position: Extended, supine.
            Directional orientation of the body: Head
at west, feet at east.
Position of hands: R arm above L arm.
L 90 degrees over lower thoracic;
Right 10 degrees over upper thoracic.
            Head position: Raised, but askance to the S.

Grave Goods: Yes, metal (possible silver). Two thin strips, 68 mm and 34 mm long, between the tibias, 15 cm to S of N tibia, exactly in the center between lower legs.

Overall State of Preservation: (Grade 3, 95% or greater)
           
Age determination estimation features:
            Epiphyses fused:  Yes
            Deciduous teeth: No
            Signs of osteoarthritis:  Yes

Age Estimation:  Old Adult (50+ yrs)

Cranial Sex determination observations:
Orbital shape: square
            Orbital rim: blunt         
            Sub-orbital ridges: pronounced
            Forehead:  sloped          
            Mandible breadth: wide
            Nuchal crest: rugged
            Mastoid process:    large
            Mental eminence:  pronounced.

Possible Sex: Male

Additional comments/observations: Bones were robust with male cranial and pelvic indicators including a thick ischiopubic ramus and narrow pelvic girdle and narrow sciatic notch. Teeth appear mostly present, but highly worn. Sacrum at an almost 90-degree angle. Feet lay laterally on each side which caused the knees to pivot laterally as well. On the back side of the occipital lobe, either small capillary roots or fabric was discovered, more likely the former, but the contents were bagged for analysis. This created a black stain on the occipital lobe. This probably indicates that the skull was raised by a soil pillow at time of interment. Several of the extremity bones (phalanges) were disarticulated during excavation, but most of the feet phalanges and metacarpals were missing due to construction work damage. Most significantly, between the tibias—20 cm to the E of the proximal side of the tibia, and 15 cm W of calcanei—two very thin metal strips (silver) with a green patina were discovered. One strip was slightly on its side, laying on its edge, with small rivets and some wood particles attached.

 

Excavation year: 2023.

E-15 (ST-2, Unit-A-1, Grave 24)

Measurements:
            Not taken in field

Body Description:
            Body position: Extended,
supine.
            Directional orientation of the
body: Head
at west, feet at east.
Position of hands: Left arm at 45-degree angle resting on thoracic;
R at 90-degree angle across abdomen.
            Head position: Skull missing.

Grave Goods: No

Overall State of Preservation: Grade 2 (60-30%)
           

Age determination estimation features:
            Epiphyses fused:  Yes
            Deciduous teeth: No
            Signs of osteoarthritis:  No

Age Estimation: Middle Adult (35-50 yrs)

Cranial Sex determination observations:
Skull not present

Possible Sex: Male

Additional comments/observations: These skeletal remains are at the lowest elevation down the mountainside of any remains discovered to date. They were revealed at the dirt road level due to construction excavation that cut into the grave inadvertently. Due to the disturbance, the skull to this body is missing. The mandible shifted to the N of the body as a result, but remained present. The rest of the body remained intact. The mudbricks enclosing the burial chamber were located to the E. The teeth of the surviving mandible are rather worn. Feet phalanges were intermixed into the thoracic cavity. Center of the left ulna shows signs of pre-mortem fracture, healed by time of death. Much damage to the overall remains due to the construction equipment. Right tibia was turned with the anterior side down. Left femoral head and anterior acetabulum shaved by equipment and the ischiopubic ramus was damaged and disarticulated, but retained. Mudbricks to east may have collapsed onto the feet. Pelvic indicators, despite damage indicate male. Blunt ridge of the ischiopubic ramus. No sub-pubic convavity. Bones robust. Teeth wear with 3 molar alveoli regrown in the mandible indicate probably post 35 years at time of death.

Excavation year: 2023

Conclusion to Field Forensic Analysis of 2023 Human Remains

The 7 graves excavated in ST-1-B and ST-2-A revealed 7 individuals, all adult males. Thus, all 24 sets of human remains discovered to date at the Sulayman Tepa site are adult males, continuing to confirm the hypothesis that this cemetery is the place of interment for the residents of the nearby monastery located down the mountainside to the north by 350 m. The field forensic analysis (which should be considered preliminary) estimated that 3 individuals (E-81-Grave-20; E-7-Grave 21; E-10-Grave 22) died as Young Adults (20-35 yrs); 3 individuals (E-86-Grave-18; E-87-Grave 19; E-15-Grave 24) died as Middle Adults (35-50 yrs); and 1 individual (E-12-Grave-23) died as an Old Adult (50+ yrs).
Burial practice also as uniform with almost identical body orientation (west-to-east) with just under half of the interred having their heads intentionally raised and arms placed across the torso in various positions, with the main difference between ST-1 and ST-2 being the placement of the entrance pit. It is still unknown if individuals were buried in shrouds. While in two or three instances over the past two seasons, possible fabric has been discovered on the bodies, both their small size and the possibility that such sample are naturally occurring organic material, such as roots, has made quick determination impossible. Samples of this possible material has been taken and analysis by a specialist is needed to make a final judgement. Even if such samples prove to be woven fabric, there may still be no way to determine if it was from clothing or a shroud.
In two instances, pre-mortem fractures were discovered on the remains. The individual, E-87-Grave-19 in ST-1 was found to have broken ribs 3 and 4 and E-15-Grave-24 had broken his left ulna. Such fractures suggest an active lifestyle and a current hypothesis—based on post-field osteological examinations from the 2022 excavations revealing some remains with pre-mortem clavicle fractures and elongated acetabulum joints—several of these monks may have regularly ridden horses.
Obviously, the most significant set of remains from the 2023 excavations were those discovered in ST-1, E-81-Grave-20. While still in a west-to-east orientation, the body was prone and the head appeared to have been detached, possibly even severed from the body and intentionally buried face down. Further investigation of the remains, particularly in the cervical and lower cranial areas, are warranted, but only three positions provide a logical explanation: First, perhaps the remains were disturbed. Unfortunately, the tomb was not discovered from the topsoil, but only after the skull was inadvertently struck with an excavator’s shovel. As a result, most of the entrance pit (E-83) was destroyed. However, the burial chamber itself was relatively intact. If the remains were disturbed at some period post interment, then the burial chamber (E-85) would have had to be compromised. Over 80% of the burial chamber in Grave 20 was intact upon discovery and carefully excavated. No evidence was seen of secondary entry or disturbance. The sub-cranial skeleton was clearly placed in its prone position at the time of interment and all the bones were in situ except possibly for the right pelvis and the skull. So, if the remains were disturbed, it could have only been these portions of the skeleton that were disturbed, but with no grave goods to loot from monks who took vows of poverty, no clear grave construction on the surface (as with all the graves in the cemetery); reasons for grave disturbance, such as tomb raiding, seem quite unlikely.
Second, the person incurred a terrible accident or trauma resulting in death. The mystery of the superior side of the right pelvis being flipped inferiorly can only be explained as human disturbance, natural disturbance (quite unlikely), or as evidence of trauma resulting in a mortality. Closer laboratory analysis will hopefully speak to this.
Third, the person was buried in an abnormal way, or a deviant burial, resulting in a form of post-mortem punishment. While still speculative, initial investigation of the remains suggest possible curvature of the spine (scoliosis) or abnormalities with the vertebrae. If so, the contextual mentality of the time may have seen this person as facing some form of divine punishment. The placement of the skull in a face-down position with the crown of the head facing north and clearly displaced from the sub-cranial skeleton, also suggests that the head was severed from the body at time of interment. Was this due to capital punishment due to beheading?
While an affirmative answer is still not definitive, Recent excavations of the medieval Christian cemetery at Usharal-Ilibalyk in Kazakhstan have found 2 burials that suggest possible alterations in burial practice as a means of post-mortem punishment. The first was the burial of a young or middle-aged adult male (Element-299, Unit 16) who was buried in with his head to the east and feet to the west, an opposite orientation to all the other burials in that cemetery (which has excavated more than 110 burials to date). In addition, his grave appeared to have been placed outside the boundary of the cemetery by 3-5 m, suggesting a separation from the community, although other interpretations may exist, such as a burial occurring at a different period following abandonment by the Christians at Ilibalyk. Another burial at Ilibalyk is a young pre-pubescent sub-adult (Element 063, Unit7D) who, just as this individual, E-81, was buried in the prone position with the skull separate from the body with the head facing downward. In the Ilibalyk case, the head’s crown was facing east, but was 10-15 cm above the rest of the body.
Post-mortem punishment can serve as a valid interpretation and there are other instances in medieval Christendom in the West in which the deceased was denied proper treatment ranging from exposure with no burial to burial in special cemeteries of the condemned. Certain Anglo-Saxon period graves as early as the 7th century have decapitated corpses interred with various aberrant body orientation and positions (see Weiss-Krejci, 286).

Fig. 9. Burial L-063 at Usharal-Ilibalyk (Kazakhstan) with body placed in prone position with head detached from body and facing downward.

 

Bibliography

Ashurov, B. (2013) Tarsakya: An Analysis of Sogdian Christianity Based on Archaeological,
Numismatic, Epigraphic and Textual Sources, PhD Diss. (London: Department of Religious Studies, SOAS, University of London).

Ashurov, B. (2018) “’Sogdian Christianity’: Evidence from Architecture and Material
Culture,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Series 3:1-42.

Baumer, C. (2014) History of Central Asia, Vol 2: The Age of the Silk Roads. London:
I.B. Tauris.

Baumer, C. (2015) “Archäologie schreibt Geschichte“, in Neue Zürcher Zeitung (11
April) 83: 59-60.

Baumer, C. (2016) The Church of the East: An Illustrated History of Assyrian
Christianity (New Ed. London: I.B. Tauris).

Baumer, C. (2016) History of Central Asia, Vol. 3: The Age of Islam and the Mongols
(London: I.B. Tauris).

Berthon, W., B. Tihanyi., L. Kis, et al. (2019) “Horse Riding and the Shape of the
Acetabulum: Insights from the Bioarchaeological Analysis of Early Hungarian Mounted Archers (10th century).” International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 29: 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.2723.

Buikstra, J. E., & Ubelaker, D. (1994). Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal
Remains. Research series no. 44. Fayetteville, Arkansas: Arkansas archeological survey research series no 44.

Cotsonis, J. A. (1994). Byzantine Figural Processional Crosses. Washington DC: Dumbarton
Oaks.

Dickens, M. (2009) “Syriac Gravestones in the Tashkent History Museum,” Hidden
Treasures and Intercultural Encounters, eds. D. Winkler and L. Tang. Münster, Lit Verlag.

Dickens, M. (2010) “Patriarch Timothy I and the Metropolitan of the Turks,” Journal of the
Royal Asiatic Society, 3rd Ser.,20, 2: 117-139.

Dickens, M. (2017) “Syriac Inscriptions Near Urgut, Ubekistan” Studia Iranica 46:205-260.

Dickens, M. (2020) Echoes of a Forgotten Presence: Reconstructing the History of the
Church of the East in Central Asia. Orientalia-Patristica-Oecumenica, Vol. 15, ed. D. Winkler. Zurich, Lit Verlag.

Dodd, E. C. (1987). “Three Early Byzantine Silver Crosses,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 41:
165-179.

Field Report on the Archaeological Excavations at Urgut-Suleiman-Tepa, Uzbekistan in
2022. International Institute for Central Asian Studies, Ya. Gulyamov Samarkand Archaeological Institute, Society for the Exploration of Eurasia. IICAS: Samarkand. https://www.exploration-eurasia.com/inhalt_english/frameset_projekt_2022.html

Fox, Sherry C. and Paraskevi Tritsaroli, (2019) “Burials and Human Remains of the Eastern
Mediterranean in Early Christian Context” in David K. Pettegrew, et. al., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Archaeology (New York: Oxford University Press): 105-126.

Gignoux, P. (2001). “Une Croix de procession de Herat inscrite en pehlevi,” Le Museon
114.3: 291-304.

Gilbert, S. (2022) “The Church of the East Cemetery at Ilibalyk,” Silk Road Traces: Studies
on Syriac Christianity in China and Central Asia. Eds. Li Tang and D. Winkler (Berlin: Lit Verlag).

Haas, Christopher (2014) “The Caucasus“ in William Tabbernee, ed., Early Christianity in
Contexts: An Exploration across Cultures and Continents: 111-141.

Hunter, E. and J. F. Coakley. (2017). A Syriac Service-Book from Turfan. MS. MIK.III.45.
Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.

Jullien, F. (2018). “Forms of the Religious Life and Syriac Monasticism,” The Syriac
World. Ed. D. King. London: Routledge.

Kolchenko, Valery (2002) “Заметки о Христианстве в Чуйской долине в средние
века,” (Notes about Christianity in the Chui Valley in the Middle Ages)”, Коомдук илимдер журналга (Bishkek: Kyrgyz-Turkish University "Manas”): 163-182.

Kolchenko, V. (2003) “Периодизация распространения христианства в Средней
Азии по данным археологии” (The periods when Christianity Spread into Central Asia according to Archeology), Буддизм и христианство в культурном наследии Центральной Азии (Buddhism and Christianity in the cultural heritage of Central Asia) (Bishkek): 53-73.

Kolchenko, V. (2013) “Кара-Джигачское (При-Пишпекское) средневековое
кладбище (археологический аспект)” [Kara-Dzhigachskoe (Pre-Pishpek) medieval cemetery (the archaeological aspect)], An International Paschal Reader: Collection of Materials (Bishkek): 81-83.

Kolchenko, V. (2018) “Кыргызстан, (Kyrgyzstan) ” in D. A. Voyakin, ed., Религии
Центральной Азии и Азербайджана. Том IV. Христианство, (Religions in Central Asia and Azerbaijan. Vol. 4, Christianity) Samarkand: International Institute for Central Asian Studies, 2018: 48-103.

Lerner, J. A. (1977). Christian Seals of the Sasanian Period [PIHANS 41]. Louvain: Peeters.

Potts, D. T. (1994). “Nestorian Crosses from Jabal Berri,” Arabian Archaeology and
Epigraphy 5.1: 61-65.

Savchenko, A. (1996) “Urgut Revisited”, ARAM.The Journal of the Society for Syro-
MesopotamianStudies 8. 1-2: 333-54.

Savchenko, A. (2005) “По поводу кхристианского селения Ургут” (On the Christian
settlement of Urgut), Zapiski Vostochnogo otdeleniya Rossiĭskogo arkheologicheskogo obshchestva 2. 27 (St. Petersburg). [Version also in English]

Savchenko, A. (2010) “Östliche Urkirche in Usbekistan,“ Antike Welt 2.10: 73-82.

Savchenko, A. and M. Dickens (2009), “Prester John’s Realm: New Light on
Christianity between Merv and Turfan,” The Christian Heritage of Iraq (Gorgias Eastern Christian Studies 13), ed. Erica C.D. Hunter (Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias): 121-135.

Spiers, J., T. Potts, and S. Cole. (2022.) Persia: Ancient Iran and the Classical World. Los
Angeles: Getty Museum.

Stewart, Charles A. (2018) “Churches,” in The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian
Archaeology, eds. T. Davis, W. Caraher and D. Pettegrew (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press): 127-146.

Stewart, Charles. A. (2020) “The Four-Petal Almond Rosette in Central Asia” Bulletin of the
International Institute of Central Asian Studies 30. IICAS: Samarkand. 69-84. [English & Russian].

Stewart, Charles A. (2022). “Iconography of Syriac Gravestones in Kyrgyzstan and
Kazakhstan,” Silk Road Traces: Studies on Syriac Christianity in China and Central Asia, eds. Li Tang and D. Winkler [orientalia-patristica-oecumenica 21] Vienna: Lit Verlag and the University of Salzburg: 145-182.

Savchenko, A. (2023) Roads and Kingdoms: Two Encounters with the Nazarenes beyond the
River. Eastern Christian Studies, Vol. 32. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

Sweetman, Rebecca (2019) “Community, Church, and Conversion in the Prefecture of
Illyricum and the Cyclades” in David K. Pettegrew, et. al., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Archaeology (New York: Oxford University Press): 515-536.

Tang, Li. (2020). “Christian or Buddhist? An Exposition of a Silk Painting from Dunhuang,
China, Now Kept in the British Museum,” Artifact, Text, Context: Studies on Syriac Christianity in China and Central Asia. Vienna: Lit Verlag: 233-243.

Trautmann, Martin, et al., (2023) “First Bioanthropological Evidence for Yamnaya
Horsemanship.” Science Advances. 9, eade2451DOI:10.1126/sciadv.ade2451.

Weiss-Krejci, E. (2013) “The Unburied Dead.” The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of
Death and Burial (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 281-301.

White, T. and P. Folkens (2005) The Human Bone Manual. (Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic
Press).

 

Appendix. Grave Comparison

AREA ST-1


  

AREA ST-2




Appendix. Photos

Figure 1 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. General view. View to the north-east

Figure 2 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. General view. View to the south-west

Figure 3 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Workflow of topsoil removal. View to the west

Figure 4 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Workflow of topsoil removal. View to the east

Figure 5 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B1 - General View. View to the south-west

Figure 6 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B1 - General view. View to the north-west

Figure 7 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B1 - General View. View to the south-west

Figure 8 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B1 element №18. View to the north-west

Figure 9 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B1 element №18,86 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 10 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B1 element № 18,82,86 after cleaning. View east

Figure 11 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element №18 Workflow of 3D model removal.

Figure 12 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element №86 The workflow of clearing a human skull.

Figure 13 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B1 element № 68,80,82,86 of the final photograph. View to the south

Figure 14 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B1 element № 68,80,82,86 of the final photograph. View to the south of the skeleton. B1.

Figure 15 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B3 - General view. View north-east

Figure 16 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B3 element №19,20 - General view. View to the north-east

Figure 17 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B3 Element №75,76,77 - grave pit №19. View to the east

Figure 18 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B3 element №87, skeleton after clearing. View to the south-south-east

Figure 19 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B3 element №87, skeleton after clearing. View to the south-east

Figure 20 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Square B3 element №87, DNA sampling process. View to the southeast

Figure 21 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element №83,84,85,81 - grave pit №20. View to the west

Figure 22 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element №83,84,85,81 - grave pit №20. View to the west

Figure 23 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element №81,85 after cleaning. Top view

Figure 24 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element №81,85 after cleaning. View west

Figure 25 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element №81 grave pit №20 - clearing process. View to the west

Figure 26 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Grave pit № 19,20 clearing process. View to the south-west

Figure 27 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The process of documenting to an electronic total station. View to the north

Figure 28 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The process of documenting to an electronic total station. View to the north

Figure 29 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. General view. Final photograph. View to the west

Figure 30 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. General view. Final photograph. View to the east

Figure 31 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The surface of the excavation site prior to excavations. North-East view.

Figure 32 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The surface of the excavation site prior to excavations. East view.

Figure 33 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The surface of the excavation site prior to excavations. North-West view.

Figure 34 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The gridding of the excavation site prior to excavation. East view.

Figure 35 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. View of the site after gridding and prior to excavation. North-West view.

Figure 36 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. View of the site after gridding and prior to excavation. North-East view.

Figure 37 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. View of the site after gridding and prior to excavation. East view.

Figure 38 - Area ST_1 - cemetery.  Removal of the turf layer. Working moment. North-East view.

Figure 39 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Digging the loose lumpy clay loam. Working moment. North-East view.

Figure 40 - Area ST_1 - cemetery.  View of the site after gridding and prior to excavation. North view.

Figure 41 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Loose lumpy clay loam. Working moment. North-East view.

Figure 42 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Digging the loose lumpy clay loam. Working moment. East view.

Figure 43 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Cleaning the surface after removing the layer of loose lumpy clay loam. Working moment. North view.

Figure 44 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Cleaning the surface after removing the layer of loose lumpy clay loam. Working moment. North-East view.

Figure 45 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Cleaning the surface after removing the layer of loose lumpy clay loam. Working moment. East view.

Figure 46 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Surfaces of the excavation area after stripping the layer of loose lumpy clay loam. West view.

Figure 47 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Surfaces of the excavation area after stripping the layer of loose lumpy clay loam. South-East view.

Figure 48 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Surfaces of the excavation area after stripping the layer of loose lumpy clay loam. East view.

Figure 49 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Surfaces of the excavation area after stripping the layer of loose lumpy clay loam. South view.

Figure 50 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Элемент 1. Element 1. Surfaces of the excavation area after stripping the layer of loose lumpy clay loam. North view.

Figure 51 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Surfaces of the excavation area after stripping the layer of loose lumpy clay loam. West view.

Figure 52 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Further removal of the layer of lumpy loose clay loam on the eastern part of the excavation area. North-East view.

Figure 53 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Further removal of the layer of lumpy loose clay loam on the eastern part of the excavation area. North-East view.

Figure 54 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Further removal of the layer of lumpy loose clay loam on the eastern part of the excavation area. North-East view.

Figure 55 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. A layer of lumpy loose clay loam (1) and the upper layer of the natural loamy soil (5) in the western part of the excavation area. North-West view.

Figure 56 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. A gray spot in the layer of lumpy loose clay loam (1) in the northeastern part of the excavation area. North-East view.

Figure 57 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. A gray spot in the layer of lumpy loose clay loam (1) in the northwestern part of the excavation area. North view.

Figure 58 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 1. Excavation of the layer of lumpy loose clay loam (1) in the northwestern part of the excavation area. North-East view.

Figure 59 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 2. A gray spot of the entrance chamber after the removal of the surface layer of lumpy loose clay loam. West view.

Figure 60 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 2. A gray spot of the entrance chamber after the removal of the surface layer of lumpy loose clay loam. North-East view.

Figure 61 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 2. Cleaning of the entrance chamber spot after the removal of the surface layer of lumpy loose clay loam. South view.

Figure 62 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 2. Cleaning of the entrance chamber spot after the removal of the surface layer of lumpy loose clay loam. East view.

Figure 63 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 2. Cleaning of the entrance chamber spot after the removal of the surface layer of lumpy loose clay loam. East view.

Figure 64 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 2. The entrance chamber after cleaning the infill. South view.

Figure 65 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 2. The entrance chamber and part of the burial chamber after cleaning the infill. South-west view.

Figure 66 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 2. The entrance chamber and part of the burial chamber after cleaning the infill. West view.

Figure 67 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 2. Entrance corridor and part of the burial chamber after clearing the internal fill. View to the west.

Figure 68 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 2. Entrance corridor and part of the burial chamber after clearing the internal fill. View to the north.

Figure 69 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 3, 4, 6. Northern wall of the excavation area with the outlines of burial chambers 3 (4), 2 (3) 4 (6) prior to the cleaning of the surface. South view.

Figure 70 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 3, 4, 6. Cleaning the surface of the northern wall with the outlines of burial chambers 3 (4), 4 (6), 2 (3). South view.

Figure 71 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 3. The outline of burial chamber 2 (3) in the northern wall of the excavation area after the surface cleaning. South view.

Figure 72 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 3. Bone fragments of human feet inside the burial chamber 2 (3) in the northern wall of the excavation area after the surface cleaning. South view.

Figure 73 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 3. The top of the vault of burial chamber 2 (3) in the north-western corner of the excavation area after the start of burial excavation. West view from above.

Figure 74 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 3. Excavation of the top of burial chamber 2 (3) in the north-western corner of the excavation area. A human skull is visible. East view from above.

Figure 75 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 3. Excavation of the top of burial chamber 2 (3) in the north-western corner of the excavation area. A human skull is visible.  North-west view from above.

Figure 76 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 3. Excavation of the top of burial chamber 2 (3) in the north-western corner of the excavation area. A human skull is visible. West view.

Figure 77 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 3. Excavation of the entrance to the burial chamber 2 (3) in the north-western corner of the excavation area. Human bones are visible. South view.

Figure 78 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 3. The cleaning of the entrance to the burial chamber 2 (3) in the north-western corner of the excavation area. Human bones are visible. South-west view.

Figure 79 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 4. The outline of burial chamber 3 (4) in the northern wall of the excavation area after the surface cleaning. South view.

Figure 80 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 4. Bone fragments of human feet inside burial chamber 3 (4) in the northern wall of the excavation area after the surface cleaning. South view.

Figure 81 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 4. A spot from the top of burial chamber 3 (4) by the northern wall of the excavation area after the surface cleaning. South-east view.

Figure 82 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 4. A spot from the top of burial chamber 3 (4) by the northern wall of the excavation area after the surface cleaning. North-east view.

Figure 83 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 4. Beginning of the excavation of the top of burial chamber 3 (4) by the northern wall of the excavation area after cleaning the surface of natural loamy soil (5). East view.

Figure 84 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 4. Beginning of the excavation of the top of burial chamber 3 (4) by the northern wall of the excavation area after cleaning the surface of natural loamy soil (5). North-east view.

Figure 85 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 4. Beginning of the excavation of the top of burial chamber 3 (4) by the northern wall of the excavation area after cleaning the surface of natural loamy soil (5). North view.

Figure 86 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 4. Beginning of the excavation of the top of burial chamber 3 (4) by the northern wall of the excavation area after cleaning the surface of natural loamy soil (5). East view.

Figure 87 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 4. Further excavation of the burial chamber 3 (4) by the northern wall of the excavation area. The signs of the collapse of the burial chamber vault are visible. North-east view.

Figure 88 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 4. The burial chamber 3 (4) with the signs of the vault collapse is in the far-distance view by the northern wall of the excavation area. East view.

Figure 89 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 4. In the process of excavation of the burial chamber 3 (4) from the top by the northern wall of the excavation area the signs of the vault collapse are visible. West view.

Figure 90 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 4. Burial chamber 3 (4) by the northern wall of the excavation area with the signs of vault collapse. North-east view.

Figure 91 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Excavation of the layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Western part of the site. North-east view.

Figure 92 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Excavation of the layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Western part of the site. North view.

Figure 93 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. 63. Element 5. Excavation of the layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Western part of the site. North-west view.

Figure 94 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Excavation of the layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Western part of the site. East view.

Figure 95 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Excavation of the layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Western part of the site. West view.

Figure 96 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Excavation of the layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Western part of the site. East view.

Figure 97 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Excavation area after the removal of the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. North-west view.

Figure 98 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Excavation area after the removal of the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. West view.

Figure 99 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Excavation area after the removal of the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. West view.

Figure 100 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Excavation area after the removal of the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. North-east view.

Figure 101 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Cleaning of the surface after stripping the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. West view

Figure 102 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Cleaning of the surface after stripping the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. North-west view.

Figure 103 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Cleaning of the surface after stripping the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. North-east view.

Figure 104 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. The surface after the removal of the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. North-east view from above.

Figure 105 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Cleaning of the surface after stripping the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. North viewо-восток.

Figure 106 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. Cleaning of the surface after stripping the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. North-east view from above.

Figure 107 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. The surface after the removal of the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. North-east view.

Figure 108 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. The surface after the removal of the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. West view from above.

Figure 109 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 5. The surface after the removal of the second layer of hard brownish loessial loamy soil in the North-Eastern and central parts of the site. East view.

Figure 110 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 6. The spot of the top of burial chamber 4 (6) by the northern wall of the site after cleaning the surface of the natural loamy soil (5). North-east view.

Figure 111 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 6. The spot of the top of burial chamber 4 (6) by the northern wall of the site after cleaning the surface of the natural loamy soil (5). West view.

Figure 112 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 6. The spot of the vault top of burial chamber 4 (6) by the northern wall of the site after cleaning the surface of the natural loamy soil (5). East view from above.

Figure 113 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 6. The top of the vault of burial chamber 4 (6) by the northern wall of the site after the start of burial excavation. North view from above.

Figure 114 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 6. The top of the vault of burial chamber 4 (6) by the northern wall of the site after the start of burial excavation. East view from above.

Figure 115 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 6. The top of the vault of burial chamber 4 (6) by the northern wall of the site after the start of burial excavation. West view from above.

Figure 116 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 6. Top of the vault of burial chamber 4 (6) at the northern wall of the excavation after the start of excavation of the burial. View from above to the south.

Figure 117 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 6. Top of the vault of burial chamber 4 (6) at the northern wall of the excavation after the start of excavation of the burial. View from above to the south.

Figure 118 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 6. At the far-distance view is the further excavation of the vault of burial chamber 4 (6) from the top center. At the entrance to the chamber on the northern side a stone barrier of mud bricks (8) of the mine (entrance) (13) to the burial chamber is visible. North view from above.

Figure 119 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 6. Top of the vault of burial chamber 4 (6) at the northern wall of the excavation after the start of excavation of the burial. View from above to the south.

Figure 120 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 6. Continued clearing of the vault of burial chamber 4 (6) from above. At the entrance to the chamber on the north side we can see the laying of raw bricks (8) of the manhole (13) into the burial chamber. View from above to the north.

Figure 121 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 6. Burial chamber 4 (6) after excavation. At the entrance to the chamber on the north side, one can see the laying of raw bricks (8) of the manhole (13) into the burial chamber. View from above to the north.

Figure 122 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 7. Process of clearing the human skeleton in the burial chamber, burial 2 (3). View to the west.

Figure 123 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 7. The process of clearing the human skeleton in the burial chamber, burial 2 (3). View to the south.

Figure 124 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 7. The process of clearing the human skeleton in the burial chamber, burial 2 (3). View to the south.

Figure 125 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 7. Skull and upper part of human skeleton in burial chamber, burial 2 (3) after clearing. View to the west.

Figure 126 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 7. Human skeleton in burial chamber, burial 2 (3) after clearing. View to the south.

Figure 127 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 7. Clearing of skeleton at the entrance to burial chamber of burial 2 (3) and packaging of remains for analyses. View to the south.

Figure 128 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 7. Clearing of skeleton at the entrance to burial chamber of burial 2 (3) and packaging of remains for analyses. View to the south.

Figure 129 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 8. Laying of raw bricks of the manhole in burial chamber 4 (6) after clearing of the entrance corridor. View to the south.

Figure 130 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 8. Laying of raw bricks of the manhole in burial chamber 4 (6) after clearing of the entrance corridor. View to the south.

Figure 131 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 8. Investigation of the laying of the raw brick and the manhole in burial chamber of burial 4 (6) after clearing of the inlet corridor. View to the north.

Figure 132 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 8. Laying of raw bricks of the entrance space of the manhole (13) on the inside of the burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6). View to the north.

Figure 133 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 8. Laying of the raw bricks of the entrance space of the manhole (13) on the inside of the burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6). View to the nor

Figure 134 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 8. Laying of raw bricks of the entrance space of the manhole (13) on the outside of the burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6). View to the south.

Figure 135 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 9. The process of clearing a fragment of the entrance corridor into the burial chamber of burial 4 (6). View to the south.

Figure 136 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 9. Part of the entrance corridor to the burial chamber of burial 4 (6) with the laying of the raw bricks of the manhole after clearing. View to the south.

Figure 137 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 9. Headboard of burial chamber of burial 4 (6) with traces of digging tools on the walls of the burial chamber. View to the south

Figure 138 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 10. Process of clearing the human skeleton in the burial chamber, burial 4 (6). View to the west.

Figure 139 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 10 The process of clearing the skeleton (10) and burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6). View to the west.

Figure 140 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 10 The process of clearing the skeleton (10) and burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6). View to the west.

Figure 141 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 10 The process of clearing the skeleton (10) and burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6). View to the west.

Figure 142 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 10 Sampling of skeletal skull teeth (10) from burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6) for genetic analysis. View to the west.

Figure 143 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 10 Sampling of skeletal skull teeth (10) from burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6) for genetic analysis. View to the west.

Figure 144 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 10 Collection of skull teeth from the skeleton of burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6) for genetic analysis. View to the west.

Figure 145 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 10. Clearing of skeleton at the entrance of burial chamber burial 4 (6) and packing of remains for analyses. View to the south.

Figure 146 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 10. Clearing of skeleton at the entrance of burial chamber burial 4 (6) and packing of remains for analyses. View to the south.

Figure 147 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 10. Clearing of skeleton at the entrance of burial chamber burial 4 (6) and packing of remains for analyses. View to the south.

Figure 148 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 11: Burial chamber of burial 3 (4) at the northern wall of the excavation with traces of vault collapse. View to the south.

Figure 149 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 11: Burial chamber of burial 3 (4) at the northern wall of the excavation with traces of vault collapse. View to the east.

Figure 150 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 11: Burial chamber of burial 3 (4) at the northern wall of the excavation with traces of vault collapse. View to the north.

Figure 151 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 11: Burial chamber of burial 3 (4) at the northern wall of the excavation with traces of vault collapse. View to the west.

Figure 152 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 11: Clearing of the entrance to burial chamber of burial 3 (4) with traces of vault collapse. View to the north.

Figure 153 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 11: Cheese bricks in partially excavated entrance to burial chamber (11) of burial 3 (4) with traces of vault collapse. View to the south

Figure 154 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 11: Partially excavated entrance to burial chamber (11) of burial 3 (4) with traces of vault collapse. View to the south.

Figure 155 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 11: Partially excavated entrance to burial chamber (11) of burial 3 (4) with traces of vault collapse. View to the south.

Figure 156 - Area ST_1 - cemetery.  Element 11: Partially excavated entrance to burial chamber (11) of burial 3 (4) with traces of vault collapse. View to the south

Figure 157 - Area ST_1 - cemetery.  Element 11: Excavation of the entrance to burial chamber (11) of burial 3 (4) with traces of vault collapse. View to the south.

Figure 158 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 12: Process of clearing the skeleton of burial chamber (11) and burial chamber of burial 3 (4) with traces of vault collapse. View to the west.

Figure 159 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 12: Process of clearing skeleton (11) and burial chamber of burial 3 (4) with traces of vault collapse. View to the west.

Figure 160 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 12: Process of clearing skeleton (11) and burial chamber of burial 3 (4) with traces of vault collapse. View to the west.

Figure 161 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 12: Process of clearing the skeleton (11) and burial chamber of burial 3 (4) with traces of vault collapse. View to the north.

Figure 162 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 12: Process of clearing the skeleton (11) and burial chamber of burial 3 (4) with traces of vault collapse. View to the north.

Figure 163 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 12: Human skeleton in burial chamber (11) of burial 3 (4) after clearing. View to the south.

Figure 164 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 12: Upper part of the skeleton in burial chamber (11) of burial 3 (4) after clearing. View to the south.

Figure 165 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 12: Clearing of a skeleton at the entrance to burial chamber (11) of burial chamber 3 (4) with traces of vault collapse. View to the south.

Figure 166 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 12: Clearing of the skeleton at the entrance to burial chamber (11) of burial 3 (4) and packaging of the remains for analyses. View to the south.

Figure 167 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 13: Clearing of the entrance space of the manhole (entrance) to the burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6). View to the south.

Figure 168 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 13: Interior of the entrance space of the manhole (entrance) to the burial chamber (9) of burial 4 (6) with the laying of raw bricks (8). View to the north

Figure 169 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 14: Destroyed burial chamber of burial 5 at the northern wall of the excavation with traces of vault collapse. View to the east.

Figure 170 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 14: Destroyed burial chamber of the burial chamber at the bottom of the hillside. View to the north.

Figure 171 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 14: Clearing of the interior of the ruined burial chamber of burial 5 at the bottom of the hillside. View to the north.

Figure 172 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 14: Clearing of the interior of the destroyed burial chamber of burial 5 at the bottom of the hillside. View to the east.

Figure 173 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 15: The process of clearing the burial chamber and skeleton of burial 5 at the bottom of the hillside. View to the east.

Figure 174 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 16: A silver cross between the legs of bone (12) from burial chamber (11), burial 3 (4).

Figure 175 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 16: A silver cross between the legs of bone (12) from burial chamber (11), burial 3 (4).

Figure 176 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 16: A silver cross between the legs of bone (12) from burial chamber (11), burial 3 (4).

Figure 177 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 16: Silver cross between the legs of a bone (12) from burial chamber (11), burial 3 (4). View to the south

Figure 178 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 16: Clearing of a silver cross between the legs of bone (12) from burial chamber (11), burial 3 (4). View to the east

Figure 179 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 16: Clearing of a silver cross between the legs of bone (12) from burial chamber (11), burial 3 (4). View to the east.

нок 180 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. Element 16: Clearing of a silver cross between the legs of bone (12) from burial chamber (11), burial 3 (4). View to the east.

Figure 181 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The process of backfilling and conservation of burials of Suleimantepa 1 burial ground after the end of research works. View to the east.

Figure 182 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The process of backfilling and conservation of burials of Suleimantepa 1 burial ground after the end of research works. View to the east

Figure 183 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The process of backfilling and conservation of burials of Suleimantepa 1 burial ground after the end of research works. View to the east.

Figure 184 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The process of backfilling and conservation of burials of Suleimantepa 1 burial ground after the end of research works. View to the south.

Figure 185 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The process of backfilling and conservation of burials of Suleimantepa 1 burial ground after the end of research works. View to the south.

Figure 186 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The process of backfilling and conservation of burials of Suleimantepa 1 burial ground after the end of research works. View to the south.

Figure 187 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The process of backfilling and conservation of burials of Suleimantepa 1 burial ground after the end of research works. View to the west.

Figure 188 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The process of backfilling and conservation of burials of Suleimantepa 1 burial ground after the end of research works. View to the west.

Figure 189 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The process of backfilling and conservation of burials of Suleimantepa 1 burial ground after the end of research works. View to the north.

Figure 190 - Area ST_1 - cemetery. The process of backfilling and conservation of burials of Suleimantepa 1 burial ground after the end of research works. View to the south.

 

Appendix. Drawings


Figure 1 - Location of the site. General layout. Satellite backing


Figure 2 - Location of the site. General layout. Topographic substrate


Figure 3 - Location of the site. General layout. Cartographic backing


Figure 4 - Excavation ST_1. General Plan. Topographic plan


Figure 5 - Excavation ST_1. General plan - numbers of graves. Orthophoto substrate


Figure 6 - Excavation ST_1. General plan - grave numbers


Figure 7 - Excavation ST_1. General plan - grave numbers. Element.


Figure 8 - Excavation ST_1. General plan - grave numbers. Heights.


Figure 9 - Excavation ST_1. Grave №18


Figure 10 - Excavation ST_1. М Grave №19


Figure 10 - Excavation 9 - Раскоп ST_1. Grave №20


Figure 11 – ST-1 excavation. Graves cross sections. Grave #18,19,20


Figure 12 - Excavation ST_1_2. General plan - grave numbers


Figure 13 - Excavation ST_1_2. General plan - grave numbers. Elevations


Figure 14 - Excavation ST-1-2. Stratigraphy – south profile.

Figure 15 - Excavation ST_1_2. Grave №1


Figure 16 - Excavation ST_1_2. Grave №2


Figure 17 - Excavation ST_1_2. Grave №3


Figure 18 - Excavation ST_1_2. Grave №4


Figure 19 - Excavation ST_1_2. Grave №5


Figure 28 – ST-1 excavation. Graves cross sections. Grave #18,19,20,2

 

Appendix. Artefacts

Fragments of unglazed ceramic vessels.


The sides are unornamented.
A fragment of a vessel sidewall was found, made of well-mixed dense dough of red colour, orange-beige shade, no significant impurities were found. On the outer side of the fragment there is a coating of dense light-coloured engobe. The thickness of the fragment is approximately equal to 0.4 cm, dimensions 1.8x3.1 cm.
 


 

Figure 1. ST-1_23_01_01

A small fragment of a vessel sidewall was found, made of well-mixed dense red dough of orange-beige colour, with insignificant admixtures of small particles of white colour visible in the fractures. The surface of the fragment without a visible engobe coating, the wall thickness is approximately equal to 0.4-0.5 cm, the size of the fragment is 1.6x2.1 cm.

 

Figure 2. ST-1_23_01_01

 

The sides are ornamented.


A fragment of a vessel sidewall was found, presumably part of a jug shoulder, made of well-mixed dense dough of red colour, orange-beige shade, no significant impurities were found. On the outer side of the fragment there is dashed ornamentation in the form of a concentric belt, consisting of straight lines along the edges, and inside alternating incisions sloping to the left, forming small stripes. The fragment is also covered with light engobe on the outside, the thickness of the wall is approximately 0.5 cm, the fragment measures 3.1x3.8 cm.


Figure  3. ST-1_23_01_01

 

Fragments of glazed ceramic vessels.


Corolla.
A fragment of a corolla from a vessel, presumably from a bowl, made of well-mixed dense dough of red colour, orange-beige shade, no significant impurities were found. From the inside and partially from the outside the fragment is covered with transparent colourless glaze on a light engobe background, also on the edge of the corolla the coating of the vessel has a dark green glaze in the form of spots or a wide belt. Just below on the fragment there is a one-colour underglaze ornamentation in black, the pattern is impossible to determine. The corolla is straight, the edges are flattened-oval in cross-section, the thickness of the walls of the vessel is 0,4-0,5 cm, the size of the fragment is 4x3,2 cm.

 

Figure 4. ST-1_23_02_01
Sides.
A fragment of a vessel sidewall was found, presumably the bottom part of a bowl, made of well-mixed dense dough of red colour, orange-beige shade, without visible impurities. The surface of the fragment on the inner side has a partially preserved layer of blue glaze and presumably part of the underglaze ornamentation of dark almost black colour. The thickness of the vessel wall is about 0.5 cm, the fragment measures 2.5x4.2 cm.

 

 

Изображение выглядит как зарисовка, рисунок, Штриховая графика, искусство  Автоматически созданное описание
Figure. 5 – ST_1_23_02_3_16

Metal finds.
A cross-shaped joint, in the form of two strips of very thin metal, presumably of silver, were attached to wooden fragments partially preserved, with small rivets or nails. The artefact was found in burial chamber E-11, located in the southern sector of the newly discovered site ST-2, Block A. It was located in a grave among human remains (E-12, grave 23). During excavation, a very thin metal fragment with green patina was found in the lower appendicular region (leg) of the skeleton exactly midway between the tibiae, 15 cm from each bone, which were 30 cm apart, 20 cm below the knees and 15 cm above the feet. Initial examination in the field laboratory revealed that these metal strips were made of silver or silver alloys. One strip was 63 mm long, 4 mm wide at its narrowest point and gradually widened (or bulged from the centre) on each side, the ends measuring 8 mm. The second strip was 34mm long, but only one end was flared. Both pieces have a concave curvature towards the ends. The longer strip (63 mm) has two nails or rivets, one about 2 mm from the end in the centre of the 8 mm long flared strip, the other in the centre of the 3 mm long strip. Each rivet had a square shaped head with a diameter of 2mm. The shorter strip (34 mm) has a square shaped hole at the narrow end and a rivet to which the wood was still stuck; this wood stretched about 15 mm along the curvature of the strip on the concave (i.e. inner) side.

 

| copyright by The Society for the Exploration of EurAsia| E-mail | Home |